Laparoscopic correction of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a current view of the problem

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse refers to a group of multidisciplinary disorders with various etiological components involved in its pathogenesis, destabilizing the ligamentous and musculofascial apparatus. In most cases, pelvic floor dysfunction requires surgical treatment, eliminating existing defects and clinical symptoms and improving patients' quality of life. Corrective surgery for genital prolapse by laparoscopic approach is highly effective and is associated with a low risk of adverse clinical outcomes. However, despite the significant progress and improvement of surgical treatment options, choosing the optimal treatment method based on a personalized approach remains an urgent issue. This literature review reviews traditional and alternative methods of laparoscopic correction of pelvic organ prolapse.

About the authors

Yulia E. Dobrohotova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: kapelovich@hpmp.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7830-2290

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vladislav V. Taranov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: vlastaranov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2338-2884

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Irina A. Lapina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: doclapina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2875-6307

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anatoly G. Tyan

GK "MEDSI"

Email: doctortyan@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1659-4256

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Tatiana G. Chirvon

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: tkoltinova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8302-7510

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nikita V. Glebov

GK "MEDSI"

Email: glebov.nv@medsigroup.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7072-6953

Doctor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Olesya V. Kaykova

GK "MEDSI"

Email: kajkova.ov@medsigroup.ru

Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anastasiya A. Malakhova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: anastasimed@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2140-8000

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Mbaye M, Autumn Edenfield L, Woll A, Swift SE. Factors affecting patient choice for continued observation versus intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;32(2):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04466-3
  2. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V. Lifetime Risk of Stress Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201-6.
  3. Weintraub AY, Glinter H, Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(1):5-14.
  4. Giri A, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, et al. Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):11-26.e3.
  5. Bhattacharyya O, Blumenthal D, Stoddard R, et al. Redesigning care: adapting new improvement methods to achieve personcentred care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):242-8.
  6. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Constantin F, et al. Uterus preservation is superior to hysterectomy when performing laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3678-3
  7. Гвоздев М.Ю., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Петлевые операции в лечении недержания мочи в РФ. Урология. Бионика Медиа. 2017;4:97-101 [Gvozdev MYu, Pushkar' DYu. Petlevyie operatsii v lechenii nederzhaniia mochi v RF. Urologiia. Bionika Media. 2017;4:97-101 (in Russian)].
  8. Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):355-60.
  9. Gluck O, Blaganje M, Veit-Rubin N, Phillips C. Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive Literature Review On Current Practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;245:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.029
  10. Moroni RM, Juliato C, Cosson M, Giraudet G. Does sacrocolpopexy present heterogeneity in its surgical technique? A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2335-45.
  11. Coolen A, van Oudheusden A. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexycompared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapsed repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1469-79.
  12. Dubuisson JB, Dubuisson J, Puigventos J. Laparoscopic Anatomy of the Pelvic Floor. Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-35498-5
  13. Cosma S, Menato G, Ceccaroni M, et al. Laparoscopic sacropexy and obstructed defecation syndrome: an anatomoclinical study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(10):1623-30.
  14. Giraudet G, Protat A, Cosson M. The anatomy of the sacral promontory: How to avoid complications of the sacrocolpopexy procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):457.
  15. Cosma S, Petruzzelli P. Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(2):239-45. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12632
  16. Dubuisson J, Veit-Rubin N. Laparoscopic lateral suspension: benefits of a cross-shaped mesh to treat difficult vaginal vault prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(5):672.
  17. Barber MD, Maher C. Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1815-30.
  18. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Gayet-Ageron A, et al. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1685-93.
  19. Orhan A, Ozerkan, K, Kasapoglu I. A meshless practical laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy modification and long-term outcomes, J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(7):1573-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.011
  20. Seracchioli R, Raimondo D, Arena A, Gava G. Laparoscopic Mesh-Less Cervicosacropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(6):399-403. doi: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000464
  21. Ozerkan K, Orhan A, Kasapoglu I, Ata B. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with polyester fiber suture: Ozerkan modification. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(8):1601-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04042-4
  22. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Lange S. Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;27(3):491-3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2859-6
  23. Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Costantini E. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2069-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04260-1
  24. Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Ismail KM. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: the Pilsner modification. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(6):1277-80. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04150-1
  25. Labanca L, Centini G, Lazzeri L, Afors K. Sacrohysteropexy: a way to spare the uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.006
  26. Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129-46.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018
  27. Лапина И.А., Доброхотова Ю.Э., Таранов В.В., и др. Комплексное ведение пациенток с пролапсом тазовых органов и метаболическим синдромом. Гинекология. 2021;23(3):260-6 [Lapina IA, Dobrokhotova YuE, Taranov VV, et al. Comprehensive management of patients with pelvis organ prolapse and metabolic syndrome. Gynecology. 2021;23(3):260-6 (in Russian)].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).