Forming a children's monologue discourse: use of anaphoric means in spontaneous children's speech
- Authors: Aisanova A.A.1, Morozova A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Irkutsk State University
- Issue: Vol 17, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 81-102
- Section: Language and Literature Studies
- Published: 30.06.2025
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2077-1770/article/view/305530
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2025-17-2-493
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UFIMMM
- ID: 305530
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The article examines the features of the use of anaphoric means in the spontaneous oral speech of preschool children. Traditionally, children's speech is studied from the point of view of occasional formations, and the construction of children's discourse is studied to a much lesser extent. At the same time, in modern linguistics, various features of the structuring of children's monological speech remain insufficiently studied, related, in particular, to the formation of a repertoire of anaphoric means and the specifics of their use. The study of this issue will help expand the understanding of both children's speech and its features, as well as the universal mechanisms of generating oral unprepared discourse.
The purpose of the article is to identify and describe the distinctive features of the use of anaphoric means by children aged 5-6 years.
Materials and methods. The research material was the transcription of monologues of preschool children. Eleven people aged 5-6 years old became informants. To obtain the necessary research material, an experiment was conducted: the informants watched the cartoon Zhiharka, and then they had to retell the plot of this cartoon. The research methods used are the quantitative method, the method of discursive analysis, and the comparative method.
Results. The results of the study showed that the most actively used anaphoric means in the speech of children aged 5-6 years are the forms of the pronoun "he" and the forms of the same word, while the zero anaphora and the forms of other pronouns are almost not used. Index groups and compound nominations turned out to be the lowest-frequency means, which is probably due to the difficulties that may arise when using them.
It has been established that from the point of view of the use of anaphoric means, the speech of children aged 5-6 years differs from that of adults, since the index group of the latter occurs much more often as an anaphor, while in the speech of children this anaphoric means is one of the least frequent.
Scope of application. The results of the research can be used in psychological and pedagogical practice when working with preschoolers, as well as for the development of training courses in such disciplines as ontolinguistics, discursive analysis, etc.
About the authors
Aleksandra A. Aisanova
Irkutsk State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: aleksandracheva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2409-7519
Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Philology
Russian Federation, 1, Karla Marksa Str., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation
Aleksandra S. Morozova
Irkutsk State University
Email: morozov.aleksandra2002@yandex.ru
student
Russian Federation, 1, Karla Marksa Str., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation
References
- Kibrik, A. A. (2003). Discourse analysis in a cognitive perspective (doctoral dissertation abstract). Moscow. 90 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QDXHIH
- Kibrik, A. A. (2025). Anaphora. Encyclopedia "Krugosvet". Retrieved from https://www.krugosvet.ru/enc/gumanitarnye_nauki/lingvistika/ANAFORA.html (Accessed: May 20, 2025)
- Kibrik, A. A., & Podlesskaya, V. I. (2009). Discourse markers in oral storytelling: a corpus-based study. In Computer linguistics and intelligent technologies: Proceedings of the annual international conference "Dialogue 2009" (pp. 390–395). Moscow: RGGU Publishing House.
- Krasavina, O. N. (2004). Usage of demonstrative phrases in Russian narrative discourse. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, (3), 51–68. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OTWTTL
- Krasnoschekova, S. V. (2016). Demonstrative deixis in Russian child speech (doctoral dissertation). Saint Petersburg. 273 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VLWMEF
- Krasnoschekova, S. V. (2012). "He" and "this": acquisition of pointing and anaphoric functions by children. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, 1(36), 72–75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PBYPRH
- Krongauz, M. A. (2005). Semantics. Moscow: Izdatel'skii tsentr "Akademiya". 352 p.
- Nikitina, S. E., & Vasilyeva, N. V. (1996). Experimental systematic dictionary of stylistic terms. Moscow: IYaR RAN. 171 p.
- Paducheva, E. V. (1985). Statement and its relation to reality: Referential aspects of pronoun semantics. Moscow: Nauka. 276 p.
- Problems of Ontolinguistics – 2007: Proceedings of the International Conference (May 21–22, 2007, Saint Petersburg). (2007). Saint Petersburg: Zlatoust. 224 p.
- Problems of Ontolinguistics – 2009: Proceedings of the International Conference (June 17–19, 2009, Saint Petersburg). (2009). Saint Petersburg: Zlatoust. 388 p.
- Problems of Ontolinguistics – 2013: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (June 26–29, 2013, Saint Petersburg). (2013). Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University. 528 p.
- Stories About Dreams: Corpus Study of Oral Russian Discourse. (2009). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur. 736 p.
- Rozental', D. É., & Tel'enkova, M. A. (1976). Dictionary-guide of linguistic terms. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. 543 p.
- Tzeitlin, S. N. (2000). Language and child: Linguistics of child speech. Moscow: Humanitarian Publishing Center VLADOS. 240 p. ISBN: 5-691-00527-8 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RTRLGJ
- Kibrik, A. A. (2020). Language, cognitive systems, and the methodology of observation. Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics, 1358, 3–16.
- Kibrik, A. A., Khudyakova, M. V., Dobrov, G. B., & Linnik, A. S. (2013). Referential choice: Factors and modeling. LATEUM 2013. Conference Proceedings, 16–21.
- Kibrik, A. A. (2013). Peculiarities and origins of the Russian referential system. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska (pp. 239–274). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.227 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WNLJVX
- Kibrik, A. A., Dobrov, G. B., Khudyakova, M. V., Loukachevitch, N. V., & Pechenyj, A. (2013). A corpus-based study of referential choice: multiplicity of factors and machine learning techniques. Text Processing and Cognitive Technologies, (20), 118–126.
- Krasavina, O. N., & Chiarcos, Ch. (2007). PoCoS — Potsdam Coreference Scheme. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 156–163. https://doi.org/10.3115/1642059.1642084
Supplementary files
