100 years of Mari fine art: national neo-romanticism (1960–1980s)
- Authors: Kolcheva E.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan State Institute of Culture
- Issue: Vol 15, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 210-224
- Section: Cultural Studies
- Submitted: 10.12.2025
- Accepted: 10.12.2025
- Published: 19.07.2023
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2076-2577/article/view/357007
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.015.2023.02.210-224
- ID: 357007
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. This article continues a series of publications dedicated to the 100th year of the Mari fine arts. National neoromanticism appeared at the late Soviet stage. It is important to clearly identify it and to determine itы place in the process under study.
Materials and Methods. The research methods are based on the author's cultural and archetypal approach. The items of art, archival documents, media publications, catalogs were provided by the museums of the Republic of Mari El.
Results and Discussion. Culture of the late Soviet period, as a background of national neo-romanticism, is characterized by an anthropological change, a demand for sincerity and expression of individuality. Within its framework, unofficial art, various forms of artistic escapism arose. The ethnical theme brought the main artistic innovations into the ‘severe style’ of the Mari Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic’s art. Visiting Russian artists, A. S. and B. S. Pushkovs, S. F. Podmarev, A. I. Butov, introduced the concept of “Mari El” into the artistic vocabulary of the Republic, created the iconographic type based on the traditional Birch and Woman archetypes, thereby contributed to the development of the new cultural archetype. National neo-romanticism emerged from the ‘severe style’ and simultaneously formed. Its essence is the poetization of the native culture. Z. F. Lavrentyev implemented it, first, through book graphics to be one of the determinants of ethnocultural reflection. A special role in the development of national neo-romanticism was played by young Mari artists N. V. Toktaulov, I. V. Efimov, I. M. Yamberdov.
Conclusion. National neo-romanticism (1970–1980s) is a stage in the development of the Mari national fine arts originated within socialist realism (1940–1980s). But it goes beyond it due to the representations of the essential issues and approaching the archetypal principles of ethnoculture.
Full Text
-
About the authors
Elvira M. Kolcheva
Kazan State Institute of Culture
Author for correspondence.
Email: еlviramk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3058-5308
Candidate Sc. {Arts}, Associate Professor, Department of the Museology, Cultural Studies and Art History
Russian Federation, KazanReferences
- Glukhov AV, Glukhova NN. Systematic reconstruction of the Mari ethnic identity.Yoshkar-Ola; 2007. (In Russ.)
- Glukhova NN. Gender aspect of floral symbolism in Mari songs. Problemy mariiskoi i sravnitel'noi filologii: sb. st. = Problems of Mari and comparative philology. Collection of articles. Yoshkar-Ola, 2015:256–261. (In Russ.)
- Zenkin AA, ed. Fine arts of the Mari ASSR.Yoshkar-Ola; 1992. (In Russ.)
- Kolcheva EM. 100 years of Mari fine art:socialist realism (late 1930s – 1980s).Finno-ugorskii mir = Finno-Ugric World.2022;14;1:100–115. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15507/2076-2577.014.2022.01.100-115.
- Kolcheva EM. 100 years of the Mari fine arts: ethnographic realism (1920–1930).Finno-ugorskii mir = Finno-Ugric World.2021;13;3:293–307. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15507/2076-2577.013.2021.03.293-307.
- Kuvshinskaia LA. Mari fine arts of the 80s (based on the materials of the anniversary exhibition “Mari Land” in 1987). Fol'klor i iskusstvo v sovremennoi khudozhestvennoi kul'ture Mariiskoi ASSR: sb. st. = Folklore and art in the modern artistic culture of the Mari ASSR. Collection of articles. Yoshkar-Ola; 1991;9:81–92. (In Russ.)
- Kudriavtsev VG. Mari graphics. Yoshkar-Ola; 2001. (In Russ.)
- Kudriavtsev VG. Folklore of the Finno-Ugric peoples of the Volga and Ural regions in the graphics of the XX century. Monograph.Yoshkar-Ola; 2010. (In Russ.)
- Otdelnova VA. Discussions on realism at the end of 1960s in the shorthand reports of the artists’ Union Moscow Branch of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic.Observatoriia kul'tury = Observatory of Culture. 2016;13;6:746–754. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-6-746-754.
- Prokushev GI. On the poetics of paintings by Mari artists at the present stage. Fol'klor i iskusstvo v sovremennoi khudozhestvennoi kul'ture Mariiskoi ASSR: sb. st. = Folklore and art in the modern artistic culture of the Mari ASSR. Collection of articles. Yoshkar-Ola; 1991;9:64–80. (In Russ.)
- Prokushev GI. Etudes about the artists of Mari El. Yoshkar-Ola; 2003. (In Russ.)
- Solov'eva GI. On the characteristics of the national and international in the painting of the Mari ASSR. Mezhnatsional'nye sviazi mariiskogo fol'klora, literatury i iskusstva:sb. st. = Interethnic ties of Mari folklore,literature and art. Collection of articles. Yoshkar-Ola; 1984;4:79–126. (In Russ.)
- Solov'eva GI. On the specifi cs and objectives of the development of the historical genre in the work of painters of the republic. Problemy tvorchestva khudozhnikov Mariiskoi ASSR na sovremennom etape: sb. st. = Problems of creativity of artists of the Mari ASSR at the present stage. Collection of articles. Yoshkar-Ola; 1989;8:5–27. (In Russ.)
- Stepanian NS. Art of Russia of the XX century:View from the 90s. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)
- Tovarov-Koshkin BF, Chervonnaia SM. Artists of the Mari ASSR. Yoshkar-Ola; 1978.(In Russ.)
- Chervonnaia SM. All our gods are with us and for us: (Ethnic identity and ethnic mobilization in contemporary art of the peoples of Russia). Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)
- Chervonnaia SM. Expression of the ethnic identity of the Mari people in contemporary fi ne arts. Finno-ugrovedenie = Finno-Ugric studies. 1996;1:72–81. (In Russ.)
- Chuzaev RI. The legitimization of the endoethnonym “Mari” in the fi rst quarter of the XX century. Finno-ugorskii mir = Finno-Ugric World. 2020;12;1:73–80. (In Russ.).doi: 10.15507/2076-2577.012.2020.01.073-080.
- Iakimovich AK. Flying over the abyss. Art,culture, picture of the world. 1930–1990.Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.)
- Kreuger A. The Gely Korzhev retrospective in Moscow: Why him? Why now? Afterall.2016;42. URL: https://afterall.org/article/thegely-korzhev-retrospective-in-moscow-whyhim-why-now- (accessed 07.07.2022).
Supplementary files


