Combined spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation in severe neuropathic pain syndrome

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Introduction. Chronic severe neuropathic pain syndrome (NPS) refractory to conservative and surgical treatments remains a significant clinical challenge. Chronic electrical stimulation of a single neural structure often proves insufficiently effective, highlighting the need for innovative approaches such as combined neuromodulation. This article aims to present a clinical case of combined spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation. A case report. A 32-year-old female with iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve following surgical intervention presented with refractory NPS (8 points on VAS). Failed conservative therapy (gabapentin, duloxetine) and surgical management (neuroma excision) led to chronic spinal cord stimulation, achieving 30% pain reduction. Subsequent ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve electrode implantation combined with chronic electrical stimulation resulted in complete pain area coverage and pain intensity reduction to 1–2 points on VAS.

Conclusion. Technical challenges associated with combined neuromodulation should not preclude its clinical application. Electrode proximity does not significantly affect system performance. Combined neuromodulation demonstrated synergistic effects in pain management by enhancing analgesia through simultaneous modulation of central and peripheral pain mechanisms. Large-scale studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this combined approach are required for routine clinical implementation.

About the authors

Viktor P. Kondratyev

N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: vstenv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3272-8699
SPIN-code: 9705-3018

postgraduate student, 6th Neurosurgical department (craniofacial neurosurgery) with the group “Functional neurosurgery”

Russian Federation, Moscow

Emil D. Isagulyan

N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery

Email: emisagulyan@gmail.com

Cand. Sci. (Med.), senior researcher, 6th Neurosurgical department (craniofacial neurosurgery) with the group “Functional neurosurgery”

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexey A. Tomskiy

N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery

Email: alexey_tomskiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2120-0146

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Department of neurosurgery with courses in neuroscience, senior researcher, 6th Clinical department, neurosurgeon, Head, Functional neurosurgery group

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Kretschmer T, Heinen CW, Antoniadis G, et al. Iatrogenic nerve injuries. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2009;20(1):73–90. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2008.07.025
  2. Яхно Н.Н., Кукушкин М.Л., Данилов А.Б. и др. Результаты Российского эпидемиологического исследования распространенности невропатической боли, ее причин и характеристик в популяции амбулаторных больных, обратившихся к врачу-неврологу. Российский журнал боли. 2008;(3):24–32.
  3. Yakhno NN, Kukushkin MV, Danylov AB, et al. Results of Russian epidemiological study of neuropathic pain (nep) prevalence among patients applying for neurological care (epic). Russian Journal of Pain. 2008;(3):24–32. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(09)60555-3
  4. Давыдов О.С., Яхно Н.Н., Кукушкин М.Л. и др. Невропатическая боль: клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению Российского общества изучения боли. Российский журнал боли. 2018;(4):5–41.
  5. Davydov OS, Yakhno NN, Kukushkin MV, et al. Neuropathic pain: clinical guidelines on the diagnostics and treatment from the Russian Association for the Studying of Pain. Russian Journal of Pain.2018;(4):5–41. doi: 10.25731/RASP.2018.04.025
  6. Blanton N, Bui P, Rizzo D. Neurologists, neuroctomy, and grafting for chronic lower extremity pain following major rearfoot reconstruction. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal. 2019;12(4):2.doi: 10.3827/faoj.2019.1204.0002
  7. Gosk J, Rutowski R, Rabczyński J. The lower extremity nerve injuries — own experience in surgical treatment. Folia Neuropathol. 2005;43(3):148–152.
  8. Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(6):571–598. doi: 10.1111/ner.12206
  9. Xu J, Sun Z, Wu J, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation in pain management: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2021;24(2):E131–E152.
  10. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007;132(1–2):179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028
  11. Baxter AL, Thrasher A, Etnoyer-Slaski JL, et al. Multimodal mechanical stimulation reduces acute and chronic low back pain: pilot data from a HEAL phase 1 study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023;4:1114633. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1114633
  12. Lipov E.G. Hybrid neurostimulator: simultaneous use of spinal cord and peripheral nerve field stimulation to treat low back and leg pain. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:147–155. doi: 10.1159/000323047
  13. Bernstein CA, Paicius RM, Barkow SH, et al. Spinal cord stimulation in conjunction with peripheral nerve field stimulation for the treatment of low back and leg pain: a case series. Neuromodulation. 2008;11(2):116–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00152.x
  14. Choi JH, Choi SC, Kim DK, et al. Combined spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation for brachial plexopathy: a case report. Pain Physician. 2016;19(3):E459–E463.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Radiographic image of the implanted electrode in the posterior epidural space at the T10–T12 vertebral levels.

Download (141KB)
3. Fig. 2. Intraoperative photograph. Ultrasound-guided electrode implantation on the sural nerve (n. suralis).

Download (242KB)
4. Fig. 3. Ultrasound image of the implanted electrode. Left: transverse scan. The electrode runs along the trunk of the sural nerve (n. suralis) at a distance of less than 1 mm from it. Right: longitudinal scan. Aligning the electrode and n. suralis in the same plane is extremely challenging due to their spatial relationship, but the electrode shadow and epineurium of n. suralis can be visualized.

Download (146KB)
5. Fig. 4. Photograph of postoperative wounds on day 3 after surgery. Several hematomas were observed in the loop pocket bed, but they had no clinically significant effect and resolved spontaneously within several weeks.

Download (315KB)
6. Fig. 5. Changes of pain intensity (VAS scores) over time depending on the treatment method.

Download (100KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Kondratyev V.P., Isagulyan E.D., Tomskiy A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).