Phenotypes of COVID-19-associated dysautonomia in patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- Authors: Savkov G.E.1, Petrikov S.S.1, Rybalko N.V.1, Khamidova L.T.1, Markatuk O.Y.1, Kiselev K.V.2, Lebedev D.A.1, Vrabiy Y.N.1, Altschuler N.E.3, Popugaev K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
- Moscow Information and Analytical Center in Healthcare
- Russian State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center
- Issue: Vol 18, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 13-23
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2075-5473/article/view/262414
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ACEN.1017
- ID: 262414
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Patients with novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) are typically prone to hemodynamic disorders of various severity. Tachycardia, increased cardiac output, or arterial hypotension affect the effectiveness of VV-ECMO. One of the possible causes of hemodynamic disorders leading to ineffective VV-ECMO may be dysautonomia (DA), which refers to an imbalance of sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The development of DA in various critical conditions was described previously. Dysautonomia also develops in COVID-19 (COVID-19-associated DA), but it was studied only in stable non-ICU patients. The presented study focuses on COVID-19-associated DA in critical COVID-19 patients requiring VV-ECMO support.
The study was aimed at determining COVID-19-associated DA phenotypes, their impact on VV-ECMO effectiveness and disease outcomes.
Materials and methods. The study included 20 patients: 12 (60%) females, 8 (40%) males. The patients had an average age of 55 years. All the patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring with spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) assessing low-frequency component of the spectrum (LF), the high-frequency component of the spectrum (HF), the LF/HF ratio on days 1, 3, and 5 of VV-ECMO. Diagnostic criteria for COVID-19-associated DA was a decrease in LF/HF < 2.28 or an increase in LF/HF > 6.94. The diagnostic criteria of predominant tone of sympathetic nervous system (sympathetic tone) was an increase in LF/HF > 6.94, while a decrease in LF/HF < 2.28 indicated predominant parasympathetic tone. Low sympathetic tone was determined by a decrease in LF < 15%, and an increase in LF > 40%. Low parasympathetic tone was determined by a decrease in HF < 15%, and an increase in HF > 25%. The criteria used were based on the results of previous studies.
The following parameters were registered in the study population: VV-ECMO weaning, duration of respiratory and VV-ECMO support, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital, and disease outcomes.
Results. COVID-19-associated DA was diagnosed in all the patients. LF/HF median value was 0.1. HRV spectrum parameters changed significantly over time: on day 5 of VV-ECMO support LF and HF values significantly decreased. The patients were divided into three groups according to the DA phenotype: group 1 (n = 4 [20%]) with normal sympathetic tone and high parasympathetic tone (nShP phenotype); group 2 (n = 14 [70%]) with low sympathetic tone and high parasympathetic tone (lShP phenotype); group 3 (n = 2 [10%]) with low sympathetic tone and normal parasympathetic tone (lSnP phenotype). The latter group was excluded from further statistical analysis due to the small sample size. In group 2, the mean HR was significantly higher compared with group 1. In group 1, VV-ECMO weaning was successful in 50% of cases, whereas in group 2 it was successful in 7.2% (p = 0.04).
Conclusions. To determine a dysautonomia phenotype, it is necessary to continuously monitor DA status in COVID-19 patients during VV-ECMO. Tachycardia in COVID-19 patients during VV-ECMO does not exclude the ANS imbalance with a significant predominance of parasympathetic tone over the sympathetic tone. It is this COVID-19-associated DA phenotype that is significantly associated with the unfavorable outcomes.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
German E. Savkov
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Author for correspondence.
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3703-4955
anesthesiologist and intensivist, Intensive care unit, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey S. Petrikov
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: yazeva@neurology.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3292-8789
D. Sci. (Med.), RAS Corresponding Member, Head, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowNatalia V. Rybalko
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6973-4430
D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Department of functional diagnostics, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowLayla T. Khamidova
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6299-4077
D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Scientific department of radiation diagnostics, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowOlga Y. Markatuk
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1711-7611
Cand. Sci. (Med.), functional diagnostics doctor, Department of functional diagnostics, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowKirill V. Kiselev
Moscow Information and Analytical Center in Healthcare
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2667-6477
senior business analyst, Moscow Information and Analytical Center of Healthcare
Russian Federation, MoscowDmitriy A. Lebedev
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6498-7658
anesthesiologist and intensivist, Intensive care unit, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowYulia N. Vrabiy
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3860-5120
anesthesiologist and intensivist, Intensive care unit, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowNatavan E. Altschuler
Russian State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center
Email: german.doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5646-0055
Cand. Sci. (Med.), endocrinologist, anesthesiologist and intensivist, assistant, Department of anesthesiology, resuscitation and intensive care, Medical and Biological University of Innovation and Continuing Education, Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center
Russian Federation, MoscowKonstantin A. Popugaev
Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Email: psolovyeva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6240-820X
D. Sci. (Med.), professor, Deputy chief, Head, Regional Vascular Center, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Ñamendys-Silva S.A. ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19. Heart Lung. 2020;49(4):348–349. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.03.012
- Tonna J.E., Abrams D., Brodie D. et al. Management of Adult Patients Supported with Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO): guideline from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ASAIO J. 2021;67(6):601–610. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001432
- Lynch J.P., Mhyre J.G., Dantzker D.R. Influence of cardiac output on intrapulmonary shunt. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ Exerc. Physiol. 1979;46(2):315–321. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.2.315
- Dantzker D.R., Lynch J.P., Weg J.G. Depression of cardiac output is a mechanism of shunt reduction in the therapy of acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1980;77(5):636–642. doi: 10.1378/chest.77.5.636
- Hovaguimian A. Dysautonomia: diagnosis and management. Neurol. Clin. 2023;41(1):193–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2022.08.002
- Dani M., Dirksen A., Taraborrelli P. et al. Autonomic dysfunction in ‘long COVID’: rationale, physiology and management strategies. Clin. Med. (Lond). 2021;21(1):e63–e67. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0896
- Romero-Sánchez C.M., Díaz-Maroto I., Fernández-Díaz E. et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry. Neurology. 2020;95(8):e1060–e1070. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937
- Koh J.S., De Silva D.A., Quek A.M.L. et al. Neurology of COVID-19 in Singapore. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020;418:117118. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117118
- Профилактика, диагностика и лечение новой коронавирусной инфекции (COVID-19): временные методические рекомендации. Версия 16 (18.08.2022). М.; 2022.
- Shekar K., Badulak J., Peek G. et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers. ASAIO J. 2020;66(7):707–721. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001193
- Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society of pacing and electrophysiology. Eur. Heart J. 1996;17(3):354–381.
- Goldberger J.J., Challapalli S., Tung R., et al. Relationship of heart rate variability to parasympathetic effect. Circulation. 2001;103(15):1977–1983. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.15.1977
- Баевский Р.М., Иванов Г.Г., Чирейкин Л.В. и др. Анализ вариабельности сердечного ритма при использовании различных электрокардиографических систем. Вестник аритмологии. 2002;(24):65–86.
- Bigger J.T. Jr, Fleiss J.L., Steinman R.C. et al. RR Variability in healthy, middle-aged persons compared with patients with chronic coronary heart disease or recent acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995;91(7):1936–1943. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1936
- Conder R.L., Conder A.A. Heart rate variability interventions for concussion and rehabilitation. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00890
- Megjhani M., Kaffashi F., Terilli K. et al. Heart rate variability as a biomarker of neurocardiogenic injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit. Care. 2020;32(1):162–171. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00734-3
- Gujjar A.R., Sathyaprabha T.N., Nagaraja D. et al. Heart rate variability and outcome in acute severe stroke: role of power spectral analysis. Neurocrit. Care. 2004;1(3):347–353. doi: 10.1385/NCC:1:3:347
- Luo X., Gao H., Yu X. et al. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability for trauma outcome prediction: an analysis of 210 ICU multiple trauma patients. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2021;47(1):153–160. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01175-5
- de Castilho F.M., Ribeiro A.L.P., da Silva J.L.P. et al. Heart rate variability as predictor of mortality in sepsis: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0180060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180060
- Rudiger A., Singer M. Decatecholaminisation during sepsis. Crit. Care. 2016;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1488-x
- Hernandez G., Tapia P., Alegria L. et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on systemic hemodynamics and exogenous lactate clearance in early experimental septic shock. Crit. Care. 2016;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1419-x
- Morelli A., Ertmer C., Westphal M. et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683–1691. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278477
- Chen W.L., Chen J.H., Huang C.C. et al. Heart rate variability measures as predictors of in-hospital mortality in ED patients with sepsis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008;26(4):395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.06.016
- Kaliyaperumal D., Rk K., Alagesan M., Ramalingam S. Characterization of cardiac autonomic function in COVID-19 using heart rate variability: a hospital based preliminary observational study. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021;32(3):247–253. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0378
- Alam S.B., Willows S., Kulka M., Sandhu J.K. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may be an underappreciated pathogen of the central nervous system. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27(11):2348–2360. doi: 10.1111/ene.14442
- Bertini P., Guarracino F., Falcone M. et al. ECMO in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2022;36 (8 Pt A):2700–2706. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.11.006
- Polderman K.H. Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypothermia. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37(7 Suppl):S186–S202. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181aa5241
- Hayano J., Sakakibara Y., Yamada A. et al. Accuracy of assessment of cardiac vagal tone by heart rate variability in normal subjects. Am. J. Cardiol. 1991;67(2):199–204. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90445-q
- Pagani M., Montano N., Porta A. et al. Relationship between spectral components of cardiovascular variabilities and direct measures of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Circulation. 1997;95(6):1441–1448. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1441
- Eckberg D.L. Sympathovagal balance: a critical appraisal. Circulation. 1997;96(9):3224–3232. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.9.3224
- Shaffer F., McCraty R., Zerr C.L. A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart's anatomy and heart rate variability. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:1040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040