EEG features in patients with Parkinson's disease during directional perception of olfactory stimuli

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Olfactory dysfunction is considered to be an early and relatively important marker of Parkinson's disease (PD). Olfactory studies using objective neurophysiological methods may become one of the diagnostic tests to identify individuals with a high risk of developing PD.

The aim of the study was to assess the spectral and topographic characteristics of bioelectrical brain activity in patients with PD during directional perception of olfactory stimuli.

Materials and methods. This study included 30 patients with PD (mean age was 66.5 ± 6.5 years). The control group consisted of 20 people without PD (mean age was 65.3 ± 8.5 years). Lavender oil, clove oil, camphor oil and β-mercaptoethanol solution (an aversive stimulus) were used for olfactory stimulation, while distilled water was used as a control test. The test subject sat with their eyes closed and inhaled the presented smell for 30 seconds, while an EEG recording was made during this time.

Study results. Olfactory stimulation in patients with PD showed increased synchronicity of the α3 rhythm in the right hemisphere, as well as the θ rhythm in the parieto-occipital regions of both hemispheres. These changes indicate significant activation of internal (endogenous) attention, increased overall, non-specific readiness potential, as well as the involvement of the limbic-reticular complex in olfactory perception. Olfactory perception in the control group was accompanied by reduction in the α1 rhythm amplitude in the parieto-occipital regions bilaterally, which may indicate moderate activation of external (exogenous) attention and the posterior attention system responsible for simple perception processes.

Conclusion. Increased α3 rhythm amplitude in the right hemisphere and increased θ rhythm amplitude, observed during directional olfactory perception, may indicate olfactory dysfunction and should be viewed as an additional indicator when establishing a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease.

About the authors

Sergey P. Kozhevnikov

Udmurt State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ksp55@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4753-0474

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor, Department of physiology, cell biology and biotechnology, Institute of Natural Sciences

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Irina L. Ivanova

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: ksp55@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6530-3497

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of neurology, neurosurgery and medical genetics

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Natalia V. Komissarova

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: ksp55@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1319-9616

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head, Department of neurology, neurosurgery and medical genetics

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Anastasia V. Shubina

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: ksp55@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7750-7235

clinical resident, Department of neurology, neurosurgery and medical genetics

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

Matvey A. Vlasov

Udmurt State University

Email: ksp55@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9623-6805

student, Institute of Natural Sciences

Russian Federation, Izhevsk

References

  1. Haehner A., Boesveldt S., Berendse H. et al. Prevalence of smell loss in Parkinson’s disease — a multicenter study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;5(7):490- 494. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.12.005. PMID: 19138875.
  2. Masago R., Matsuda T., Kikuchi Y. et al. Effects of inhalation of essential oils on EEG activity and sensory evaluation. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2000;19(1):35-42. doi: 10.2114/jpa.19.35. PMID: 10979248.
  3. Ishimaru T., Hatanaka S., Yata T. et al. Potential changes with gamma-band oscillations at the frontal scalp elicited by intravenous olfactory stimulation in humans. Chem Senses. 2002;27(8):711-717. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.8.711. PMID: 12379595.
  4. Carson N., Leach L., Murphy K. A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(2):379-388. doi: 10.1002/gps.4756. PMID: 28731508.
  5. Ponsen M., Stoffers D., Booij J. et al. Idiopathic hyposmia as a preclinical sign of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(2):173-181. DOI: 10.1002/ ana.20160. PMID: 15293269.
  6. Deems D., Doty R., Settle R. et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(5):519-528. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870170065015. PMID: 2021470.
  7. Sergin V.Ya. Perceptual binding of sensory events: hypothesis of enveloping characteristics. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti im. I.P. Pavlova. 2002;52(6):645-655. doi: 10.1023/A:1025137029332. (In Russ.)
  8. Yuvaraj R., Murugappan M., Kenneth Sundaraj. EEG dynamics in neurological disorders: Parkinson’s disease and stroke. In: 2012 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD). 2012:32-37. DOI: 10.1109/ SCOReD.2012.6518606.
  9. Melgari J., Curcio G., Mastrolilli F. et al. Alpha and beta EEG power reflects L-dopa acute administration in parkinsonian patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:302. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00302. PMID: 25452725.
  10. Klimesch W., Sauseng P., Hanslmayr E. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res. Rev. 2007;53(1):63-88. DOI: 10.1016/j. brainresrev.2006.06.003. PMID: 16887192.
  11. Shaw J. Intention as a component of the alpha-rhythm response to mental activity. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996;24(1-2):7-23. doi: 10.1016/s0167- 8760(96)00052-9. PMID: 8978432.
  12. Pardo J., Fox P., Raichle M. Localization of human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 1991;349(6304):61-64. doi: 10.1038/349061a0. PMID: 1985266.
  13. Posner M.I. Editor’s note: Attention in cognitive neurosistems. J Cogn Neu- rosci. 1991;3(4):303-303. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.303. PMID: 23967808.
  14. Rusalova M.N. Functional asymmetry of the brain and emotions. Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk. 2003;34(4):93-112. (In Russ.)
  15. Savostyanov A.N., Savostyanova D.A. Changes in the electrical activity of the brain during habituation to a verbal stimulus in people with high and low levels of individual anxiety. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti im. I.P. Pavlova. 2003;53(3):351-360. (In Russ.)
  16. Harmony T., Fernandez T., Silva J. et al. EEG delta activity: an indicator of attention to internal processing during performance of mental tasks. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1996;24(1-2):161-171. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00053-0. PMID: 8978441.
  17. Sharova E.V, Boldyreva G.N., Kulikov M.A. et al. EEG correlates of the states of visual and auditory attention in healthy subjects. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2009;35(1):5-14. doi: 10.1134/s0362119709010010. (In Russ.)
  18. Machinskaya R.I. Neurophysiological mechanisms of voluntary attention: analytic review. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti im. I.P. Pavlova. 2003;(53)2:133-152. (In Russ.)
  19. Basar E., Basar-Eroglu C., Karakas S., Schurmann M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001;39(2-3):241-248. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00145-8. PMID: 11163901.
  20. Lee E., Eslinger P., Du G. et al. Olfactory-related cortical atrophy is associated with olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Dis. 2014;29(9): 1205-1208. doi: 10.1002/mds.25829. PMID: 24482154.
  21. Westermann B., Wattendorf E., Schwerdtfeger U. et al. Functional imaging of the cerebral olfactory system in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neu- rosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(1):19-24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.113860. PMID: 17519323.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Subjective scores of the intensity of the presented odour in the study groups. *p<0,01 compared to the control group

Download (89KB)
3. Fig. 2. Comparison of the α3 rhythm amplitude in the study groups during olfactory stimulation (frontotemporal regions). *p<0.01 compared to the control group (group factor/hemisphere factor comparison).

Download (103KB)
4. Fig. 3. Comparison of the θ-rhythm amplitude in the study groups during olfactory stimulation. * p <0.01 compared to the control group (group factor/region factor/hemisphere factor comparison).

Download (124KB)
5. Fig. 4. Changes in the ∆-rhythm amplitude in the control group during olfactory stimulation (central regions). * p <0.01 compared with the control group (state factor/region factor/hemisphere factor comparison).

Download (107KB)
6. Fig. 5. Changes in the α1 rhythm amplitude in the control group during olfactory stimulation. *p<0.01 compared to the control group (state factor/region factor comparison).

Download (107KB)
7. Fig. 6. Changes in the β2 rhythm amplitude in the group with PD during olfactory stimulation. *p<0.01 compared to the control group (state factor/region factor comparison).

Download (100KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Kozhevnikov S.P., Ivanova I.L., Komissarova N.V., Shubina A.V., Vlasov M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies