Comparison of antiarrhythmic medications propafenone and amiodarone injection forms effectiveness in medicamentous cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. According to present 2016-2017 recommendations, propafenone and amiodarone are the main antiarrhythmic medications (AAM) for medicamentous sinus rhythm (SR) restoration. Direct effectiveness and safety comparison of these medications injectable forms for atrial fibrillation (AF) paroxysm treatment on pre-hospital stage is one of the pressing issues. Aim. To compare effectiveness and safety of propafenone and amiodarone use in urgent SR restoration in patients with paroxysmal AF on pre-hospital stage. Materials and methods. An open randomized multicenter prospective study PROMETEI-INSK was conducted. The study included 388 patients with AF paroxysm with mean lasting time of 195 minutes. For the purpose of AF paroxysm treatment amiodarone intravenous bolus was used, in group 2 (268 patients) - propafenone intravenous bolus. The compared groups were matched by sex, age, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, and anamnesis of arrhythmic events, comorbid pathology, and therapy. The following investigations were performed: physical examination, medical history taking, ECG before and after rhythm restoration, as well as basic vital factors evaluation (such as heartbeat rate, blood pressure). Study results were processed with the use of statistical data analysis software package Statistica 10 for Windows (StatSoft Inc., USA). Results. AAM effectiveness was evaluated for 24 hours until SR restoration. In the group 1 (amiodarone use) the effectiveness was 61.7% (n=74), in group 2 (propafenone) - 77.6% (n=208); p<0.05. The mean time of rhythm restoration in group 1 was 110 minutes, in group 2 - 22 minutes (p<0.05). Relief of AF paroxysm happened in less than 60 minutes in 25.83% (n=31) of patients in group 1, and in 64.5% (n=173) in group 2; p<0.05. There were no significant differences observed in proarrhythmic and other adverse effects. Conclusion. Propafenone in injectable form is an effective and safe AAM in AF paroxysmal form treatment in comparison with amiodarone on pre-hospital stage. In patients with AF who have no changes in cardiac structure amiodarone is not a first line drug for emergency management of recently emerged AF.

About the authors

Aleksei V. Tarasov

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: a730tv@yandex.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Surgery of Complex Cardiac Rhythm Disturbances and Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation 10, 3, Petroverigskii ln., Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation

Sergei A. Kosykh

Moscow Regional Ambulance Station

Head of Puskin station of North-East district State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Chief external expert on EMC at medical district №1 of Moscow region Ministry of Health, emergency physician, first category intensivist 3, Znamenskaia st., Krasnogorsk, Moscow region, 143405, Russian Federation

Elena V. Bushueva

L.A.Vorokhobov City Clinical Hospital №67

Head of the 3rd Cardiological Department 2/44, Saliama Adilia st., Moscow, 123423, Russian Federation

Karapet V. Davtyan

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

D. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Arrythmias and Impairment of Heart Conduction 10, 3, Petroverigskii ln., Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation

Olga N. Miller

Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: miller.olga@list.ru
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof. at Department of Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology and Industrial Pathology 52, Krasnyi dr., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al. 2016 Esc Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the ESC. Developed with the special contribution of the EHRA of the ESC. Endorsed by the ESO. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (38). doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210
  2. Диагностика и лечение фибрилляции предсердий. Рекомендации РКО и ВНОА, 2017.
  3. Goette А, Honeycutt С, Langberg J.J. Electrical remodelling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94 (7): 2968-74.
  4. Sra J, Zaidi S.T, Krum D et al. Correlation of spontaneous and induced premature atrial complexes initiating atrial fibrillation in humans: electrophysiologic parameters for guiding therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12 (12): 1347-52.
  5. Khan I.A. Single oral loading dose of propafenonefor pharmacological cardioversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 542-7.
  6. Boriani G, Martignani C, Biffi M et al. Oral loading with propafenone for oral conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A review of in-hospital treatment. Drugs 2002; 62: 415-23.
  7. Naccarelli G.V, Walbrette D.L, Khan M et al. Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation. Comparative efficacy and results of trials. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (Suppl.):15D-26D.
  8. Conti A, Del Taglia B, Mariannini Y et al. Management of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 903-10.
  9. Sestito A, Molina E. Atrial fibrillation and the pharmacological treatment: the role of propafenone. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012; 16 (2): 242-53.
  10. Миллер О.Н., Тарасов А.В., Дик И.С., Беляева И.Е. Купирование фибрилляции предсердий на догоспитальном и стационарном этапах с позиций доказательной медицины. Consilium Medicum 2016; 18 (10): 8-18.
  11. Тарасов А.В. Вопросы безопасности антиаритмической терапии. Consilium Medicum. 2014;16 (10): 44-9.

Copyright (c) 2019 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies