Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. An updated approach to lifestyle modification and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The issue of optimal antihyperglycemic therapy choice presents essential, taking into consideration the increase of number of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and excessive mortality of these patients from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The updated recommendations presented in consensus report of American Diabetes Association (ADA) in cooperation with European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) in 2018 reflect complex approach to treatment of adult patients with DM type 2 that aims not only to improve glycemic control, but also to decrease CVD incidence and mortality. Materials and methods. In order to write this review we analyzed ADA/EASD consensus report of 2018 as well as Russian algorithms and recommendations on DM treatment and several foreign sources including 2008 documents from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the documents from American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) published over the past year. Results. A complex control of risk factors that includes patient’s lifestyle change and use of safe and effective medications that will contribute to lipid metabolism, arterial blood pressure and thrombocyte function normalization is required in order to reduce CVD risk and mortality in patients with DM type 2. Lifestyle modification is placed special focus on. It comprises patients’ encouragement and competence increase as well as development and implementation of an individualized program of nutrition intervention and patients’ physical activity increase. In patients with DM type 2 glycemia self-control is considered to be of great importance because it allows the trained patients to control the disease course much better. A favorable prognosis is possible only when complex individual approach is used. Conclusion. Despite development of new effective and safe medications, more than ½ of the patients do not reach glycemia target levels. Therapeutic inactivity, that is multifactorial, is of great significance. In order to cope with it efforts are required both from the whole health care system and from medical practitioners and patients themselves. Modern combined antihyperglycemic therapy that has effect on various pathogenic mechanisms and allows to level down glycemia variability and increase treatment compliance is quite actual. During all stages of DM type 2 treatment it is essential to bear in mind that multifactor and individualized approach is required in order to achieve long-term results.

About the authors

Elena A. Volkova

I.I.Mechnikov North-West State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: doctorelena555@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Pofessor, V.G. Baranov Department of Endocrinology 41, Kirochnaia st., Saint Petersburg, 191015, Russian Federation

Olga F. Malygina

I.I.Mechnikov North-West State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, V.G. Baranov Department of Endocrinology 41, Kirochnaia st., Saint Petersburg, 191015, Russian Federation

References

  1. Аметов А.С., Курочкин И.О., Зубков А.А. Сахарный диабет и сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. РМЖ. 2014; 13: 954. https://www.rmj.ru/articles/mnenie_eksperta/sakharnyy-diabet-i-serdechno-sosudistye-zabolevaniya/#ix..
  2. Викулова О.К. Государственный регистр сахарного диабета РФ: статус 2015 и данные исследований с активным скринингом модуля «Диабет-центр», 3 марта 2016. gos.registr@endocrincentr.ru
  3. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; Di Angelantonio E, Gao P et al. Glycated hemoglobin measurement and prediction of cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2014; 311 (12): 1225-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1873
  4. Шестакова Е.А. Выбор второй линии терапии у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа: активация метаболической памяти. Сахарный диабет. 2017; 20 (5): 356-62. doi: 10.14341/DM8793
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: diabetes mellitus - evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic therapies to treat type 2 diabetes [Internet]. Available from www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm071627.pdf.
  6. Консенсусный отчет ADA/EASD по лечению гипергликемии при сахарном диабете типа 2 по состоянию на 2018 год. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0033
  7. Lean M.E, Leslie W.S, Barnes A.C et al. Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 541-51.
  8. Boule N.G, Haddad E, Kenny G.P et al. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001; 286: 1218-27.
  9. Chudyk A, Petrella R.J. Effects of exercise on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1228-37.
  10. Franz M.J, Boucher J.L, Rutten-Ramos S, VanWormer J.J. Lifestyle weight-loss intervention outcomes in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015; 115: 1447-63.
  11. Волкова Е.А., Ворохобина Н.В., Малыгина О.Ф. Модификация образа жизни, обучение и самоконтроль - важные компоненты лечения сахарного диабета и улучшения качества жизни пациентов. Consilium Medicum. 2015 ; 17 (1): 54-62.
  12. Волкова Е.А., Малыгина О.Ф. Самоконтроль и изменение образа жизни пациентов как важнейшая часть комплексной терапии сахарного диабета типа 2. Справочник поликлинического врача. 2018; 2: 47-52.
  13. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю. и др. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Сахарный диабет. 2017; 20 (1S): 1-121.
  14. American Diabetes Association. 4. Lifestyle management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41 (Suppl. 1): S38-S50.
  15. Powers M.A, Bardsley J, Cypress M et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 1372-82.
  16. Pillay J, Armstrong M.J, Butalia S et al. Behavioral programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 848-60.
  17. He X, Li J, Wang B et al. Diabetes selfmanagement education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 2017; 55: 712-31.
  18. Chatterjee S, Davies M.J, Heller S et al. Diabetes structured selfmanagement education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 130-42.
  19. Anjana R.M, Kesavadev J, Neeta D et al. A multicenter real-life study on the effect of flash glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017; 19: 533-40.
  20. Riddle M.C, Gerstein H.C, Holman R.R et al. A1C targets should be personalized to maximize benefits while limiting risks. Diabetes Care 2018; 41: 1121-4.
  21. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41 (Suppl. 1): S55-S64.
  22. AACE/ACE T2D Management, Endocr Pract 2018; 24 (1): S91-S120.
  23. Polonsky W.H, Henry R.R. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10: 1299-307.
  24. McGovern A, Tippu Z, Hinton W et al. Comparison of medication adherence and persistence in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20: 1040-3.
  25. American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment. Diabetes Care 2017; 40 (Suppl. 1): 64-74. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S011
  26. Marso S.P, McGuire D.K, Zinman B et al.; DEVOTE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 723-32.
  27. Rosenstock J, Hollander P, Bhargava A et al. Similar efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine and insulin glargine (Lantus®) in patients with type 2 diabetes who were insulin-naive or previously treated with insulin glargine: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial (the ELEMENT 2 study). Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 734-41.
  28. Schauer P.R, Bhatt D.L, Kirwan J.P et al.; STAMPEDE Investigators. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 641-51.
  29. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 964-73.
  30. Mechanick J.I, Kushner R.F, Sugerman H.J et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and non-surgical support of the bariatric surgery patient. Obesity (SilverSpring) 2009; 17 (Suppl. 1): S1-S70.

Copyright (c) 2019 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies