Tuberculous peritonitis. Identification difficulties

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To study forms of the course of the disease, variations of clinical and morphological manifestations and diagnostics of tuberculous peritonitis with determination of optimal examination and surgical tactics algorithm. Materials and methods. In the period from 2009 to 2018 in the Tuberculosis surgery department of the Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control 58 patients with tuberculous peritonitis were examined and operated. Among the hospitalized patients, males prevailed (males - 39; 67.2%, females - 19; 32.8%), while the patients' age ranged from 20 to 63 years (median - 37.2 years). The complex examination of patients included diagnostic radiology methods (MSCT and ultrasonography) of the abdominal cavity and chest, diagnostic video laparoscopy, laboratory and morphological methods. Results and discussion. According to the clinical and morphological picture of peritoneal tuberculosis, all patients were divided into three groups: patients with the predominant syndrome of fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity (37, 63.8%), patients with the prevailing enterocolitis syndrome and intestinal obstruction (19, 32.8%), patients with symptoms of peritonitis and abdominal sepsis (2, 3.4%). Anamnestic data on the timing of occurrence and course of the disease allowed to speak of the extreme variability in the course and duration of tuberculous peritonitis. Non-invasive diagnostic radiology methods showed a high level of informativeness in visualization of free fluid in the abdominal cavity (more than 90% positive results), but its detection with MSCT or ultrasonography can only serve as indirect evidence of tuberculous peritonitis, as it is observed in a wide range of diseases. Accumulations of fluid in the abdominal cavity in the presence of thickened and layered areas of the peritoneum, as well as signs of partial or complete small bowel obstruction detected with MSCT may be markers of peritoneal tuberculosis in 81% of cases, but laboratory confirmation of the process etiology is always required. The examination of exudates in only one third of cases allowed to identify the pathogen with PCR (29.3%), bacteriological examination showed bacterial growth of the MBT after 8-9 weeks in only 8.6% of patients. Only a peritoneal biopsy with bacterioscopic and histological examination of the biopsy specimen showed the highest confidence rates in the detection of Acid-Resistant Mycobacterium (74.1%) and specific granulomas (93.1%) or their equivalents in cases of HIV infection. Conclusion. With all the variety of clinical and morphological pictures of tuberculous peritonitis, the only highly informative diagnostic method is surgical involvement with a peritoneal biopsy followed by bacterioscopic and histological examination of biopsy specimen.

About the authors

Dmitrii V. Plotkin

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: kn13@list.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Mikhail N. Reshetnikov

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Irina A. Sokolina

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Iuliia R. Ziuzia

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Evgenii A. Stepanov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Olga V. Belentseva

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

surgeon Moscow, Russia

Umedzhon O. Gafarov

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

Cand. Sci. (Med.) Moscow, Russia

Mikhail V. Sinitsyn

Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control

канд. мед. наук, дир. Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Синицын М.В., Белиловский Е.М., Соколина И.А. и др. Внелегочные локализации туберкулеза у больных ВИЧ-инфекцией. Туберкулез и болезни легких. 2017; 95 (11): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2017-95-11-19-25 @@Sinitsyn M.V., Belilovskii E.M., Sokolina I.A. et al. Vnelegochnye lokalizatsii tuberkuleza u bol'nykh VICh-infektsiei. Tuberkulez i bolezni legkikh. 2017; 95 (11): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2017-95-11-19-25 (in Russian).]
  2. Aguado J.M, Pons F, Casafont F. Tuberculous peritonitis: a study comparing cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 1990; 12: 550.
  3. Getahun H, Gunneberg C, Granich R, Nunn P. HIV infection associated tuberculosis: the epidemiology and the response. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50 (3): 201-7. doi: 10.1086/651492
  4. Ködmön C, Zucs P, Van der Werf M.J. Migration-related tuberculosis: Epidemiology and characteristics of tuberculosis cases originating outside the European Union and European Economic Area, 2007 to 2013. Euro Surveill 2016; 21. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.12.30164
  5. Vaid U, Kane G.C. Tuberculous Peritonitis. Microbiology Spectrum 2017; 5. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0006-2016
  6. Srivastava U, Almusa О, Ka-wah Tung, Heller М.Т. Tuberculous peritonitis. Radiology Case Reports 2014; 9 (3): 971. https://doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v9i3.971
  7. Sanai F.M, Bzeizi K.I. Systematic review: Tuberculous peritonitis - Presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 685-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02645.x
  8. Cavalli Z, Ader F, Valour F et al. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and bacterial epidemiology of peritoneal tuberculosis in two university hospitals in France. Infect Dis Ther 2016; 5: 193-9. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0113-2
  9. Савоненкова Л.Н., Арямкина О.Л. Клиника, патогенетические аспекты туберкулеза органов пищеварения. Проблемы туберкулеза и болезней легких. 2005; 6: 42-5. @@Savonenkova L.N., Ariamkina O.L. Klinika, patogeneticheskie aspekty tuberkuleza organov pishchevareniia. Problemy tuberkuleza i boleznei legkikh. 2005; 6: 42-5 (in Russian).
  10. Нечаева О.Б. Эпидемическая ситуация по туберкулезу среди лиц с ВИЧ-инфекцией в Российской Федерации. Туберкулез и болезни легких. 2017; 95 (3): 13-9. https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2017-95-3-13-19 @@Nechaeva O.B. Epidemicheskaia situatsiia po tuberkulezu sredi lits s VICh-infektsiei v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Tuberkulez i bolezni legkikh. 2017; 95 (3): 13-9. https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2017-95-3-13-19 (in Russian)
  11. Ленский Е.В. Абдоминальный туберкулез: трудности диагностики. Сиб. мед. журн. 2006; 59 (1): 5-10.@@Lenskii E.V. Abdominal'nyi tuberkulez: trudnosti diagnostiki. Sib. med. zhurn. 2006; 59 (1): 5-10 (in Russian).
  12. Kaya M, Kaplan M.A, Isikdogan A, Celik Y. Differentiation of tuberculous peritonitis from peritonitis carcinomatosa without surgical intervention. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011; 17 (5): 312-7. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.84484
  13. Salgado Floresa L, Hernández Solísa А, Escobar А. Peritoneal tuberculosis: A persistent diagnostic dilemma, use complete diagnostic methods. Revista Médica del Hospital General de México 2015; 78 (2): 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hgmx.2015.03.009
  14. Chow K.M, Chow V.C, Szeto C.C. Indication for peritoneal biopsy in tuberculous peritonitis. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 567.
  15. Shen Y.C, Wang T, Chen L. Diagnostic accuracy of adenosine deaminase for tuberculous peritonitis: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci 2013; 9: 601. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.36904
  16. Kaushik R, Punia R, Mohan H, Attri A.K. Tuberculous abdominal cocoon - a report of 6 cases and review of the Literature. World J Emergency Surg 2006; 1: 18. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-18
  17. Koc S, Beydilli G, Tulunay G. Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective review of 22 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103: 565. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-88
  18. Okamoto K, Hatakeyama S. Tuberculous Peritonitis. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 20-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1713168
  19. Peng-Hui Wang. Tuberculous peritonitis should always be considered as a differential diagnosis in abdominal carcinomatosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 43 (3): 182. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60083-8
  20. Sotoudehmanesh R, Shirazian N, Asgari A.A. Tuberculosis peritonitis in an endemic area. Digestive Liver Dis 2003; 35: 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(02)00010-5
  21. Савоненкова Л.Н., Анисимова С.В., Сидорова Ю.Д. и др. Летальность больных туберкулезом в условиях эпидемии ВИЧ-инфекции. Ульяновский медико-биологический журн. 2018; 3: 99-106. @@Savonenkova L.N., Anisimova S.V., Sidorova Iu.D. et al. Letal'nost' bol'nykh tuberkulezom v usloviiakh epidemii VICh-infektsii. Ul'ianovskii mediko-biologicheskii zhurn. 2018; 3: 99-106 (in Russian).

Copyright (c) 2019 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies