Use of combination pills with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel in coronary artery disease. Efficacy and assessment of adherence to treatment: Kobra Study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Assessment of the efficacy and adherence to treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel combination drug compared to separate administration of the drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients with chronic coronary syndrome after coronary stent implantation. Materials and methods. The study included 100 patients randomized to receive either original clopidogrel (Plavix® Sanofi) only or original ASA (Aspirin® Cardio Bayer) only or the generic fixed drug combination (Plagril® A Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.). Over the first 7-10 days after the index event, all patients were treated with a separate drug in the hospital, then received double antiplatelet therapy with appropriate drugs on an outpatient basis for 4 months, and purchased the drugs on their own for the last 2 months of follow-up. Monitoring the efficacy of therapy and patient adherence to treatment was carried out according to the clinic data, platelet aggregation indicators and blood thromboxane B2 (TXB2), salicylic acid and clopidogrel metabolite (carboxylic acid) levels on the 7th day after disease onset and after 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Results. Most of the patients were elderly (mean age 68.3±10.6 years), of them 35% were women. After 8 and 16 weeks of treatment in hospital, platelet aggregation indicators did not differ between patients taking separate drugs or a fixed combination. The generic Plagril® A inhibited the aggregation response similarly to the original drugs. At moment of randomization, baseline blood TXB2, salicylic acid and the carboxyl metabolite of clopidogrel levels were comparable in both groups of patients (p>0.05). After 8 weeks of therapy, patients taking Plagril® A had significantly lower TXB2 levels compared with the separate administration of Plavix and Aspirin Cardio: 0.1±0.05 ng/ml vs 0.2±0.23 ng/ml, respectively (p<0.001). After 16 weeks, TXB2 levels reached 0.28±0.56 ng/ml vs 0.43±0.48 ng/ml, respectively (p=0.006). There were no differences in blood salicylic acid and clopidogrel carboxyl metabolite blood levels between the groups of patients during the entire study period. Adherence to antiplatelet therapy during inpatient period of treatment was 100%. In the first 8 weeks, it decreased to 74.5%, and after 16 weeks - to 71.5%. When taking the drugs separately, missing rate was higher in ASA group: 21.2% vs 5% in clopidogrel group. Conclusion. Plagril® A is bioequivalent and as effective as the original ASA and clopidogrel taken separately, in terms of the effect on platelet activity and blood clopidogrel metabolite levels. The adherence to a fixed combination of clopidogrel and ASA in patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients with chronic coronary syndrome is significantly higher than when these drugs are taken separately, both at the stages of free treatment and when purchasing drugs on their own.

About the authors

Nikita V. Lomakin

Central Hospital with Outpatient Department

д-р мед наук, гл. внештатный специалист-кардиолог Moscow, Russia

Liudmila I. Buryachkovskaya

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

Email: livbur@mail.ru
д-р биол. наук, вед. науч. сотр. Moscow, Russia

Anastasya A. Senichkina

Central Hospital with Outpatient Department

врач Moscow, Russia

Alexander B. Sumarokov

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

канд. мед. наук, ст. науч. сотр Moscow, Russia

Uylia V. Docenko

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

канд. мед. наук, мл. науч. сотр. Moscow, Russia

Vasily I. Kazey

EXAKTE LABS

канд. биол. наук, ген. дир. Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Стабильная ишемическая болезнь сердца. Клинические рекомендации Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации 2020. Режим доступа: https://scardio.ru/content/Guideli-nes/2020/Clinic_rekom_IBS.pdf. Ссылка активна на 24.02.2021
  2. Острый инфаркт миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. Клинические рекомендации Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации 2020. Режим доступа: https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_OKS_sST.pdf. Ссылка активна на 24.02.2021
  3. Острый коронарный синдром без подъема сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. Клинические рекомендации Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации 2020. Режим доступа: https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_OKS_bST.pdf. Ссылка активна на 24.02.2021.
  4. Пучиньян Н.Ф., Довгалевский Я.П., Долотовская П.В., Фурман Н.В. Приверженность рекомендованной терапии больных, перенесших острый коронарный синдром, и риск развития сердечно-сосудистых осложнений в течение года после госпитализации. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2011; 7 (5): 567-73. doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2011-7-5-57-61
  5. Ho PM, Lambert-Kerzner A, Carey E, et al. Multifaceted intervention to improve medication adherence and secondary prevention measures after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 186-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12944
  6. Castaneda-Amado Z, Calixto-Aguilar L, Loza Munarriz C, Medina Palomino FA. Medical compliance to evidence-based clinical guidelines on secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in a hospital from Lima, Peru: a retrospective study. Medwave 2017; 17: e6989. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2017.05.6989
  7. Chowdhury R, Khan H, Heydon E, et al. Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2940-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht295
  8. Solomon M, Leong T, Levin E, et al. Cumulative adherence to secondary prevention guidelines and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9 (6): e014415. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014415
  9. Wald NJ, Law MR. A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%. BMJ 2003; 326: 1419-24. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1419
  10. Агеев Ф.Т., Смирнова М.Д., Фофанова Т.В. Повышение приверженности к терапии: «дело техники»? Сердечная недостаточность. 2011; 12 (4-66): 238-43 [Ageev FT, Smirnova MD, Fofanova TV. Increased adherence to therapy: “a matter of technology”? Serdechnaia nedostatoch-nost'. 2011; 12 (4-66): 238-43 (in Russian)].
  11. Webster R, Patel A, Selak V, et al. Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication (“polypills”) compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: a prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries. Int J Cardiol 2016; 205: 14756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015
  12. Yusuf S, Joseph P, Dans A, et al. Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. New Engl J Med 2020; 383 (21). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028220
  13. Deharo P, Quilici J, Bonnet G, et al. Fixed-dose aspirin-clopidogrel combination enhances compliance to aspirin after acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 172 (1): e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.194
  14. Oh P, Ahn T, Kim D, et al. Comparative effect on platelet function of a fixed-dose aspirin and clopi-dogrel combination versus separate formulations in patients with coronary artery disease: A phase IV, multicenter, prospective, 4-week non-inferiority trial. Int J Cardiol 2016; 202: 331-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.024
  15. Li Y, Ming J, Kong F, et al. Bioequivalence Study Comparing Fixed-Dose Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin with Coadministration of Individual Formulations in Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study. Adv Ther 2020; 37 (11): 4660-74. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12859856
  16. Jung JA, Kim TE, Kim JR, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel compared with the concurrent administration of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period, singledose crossover study. Clin Ther 2013; 35 (7): 985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.05.015
  17. Ломакин Н.В., Бурячковская Л.И., Золин Д.А., Казей В.И. Проспективное инициативное одноцентровое открытое пострегистрационное сравнительное исследование лабораторной эффективности различных форм ацетилсалициловой кислоты в кардиопротек-тивной дозе с различным составом вспомогательных веществ: результаты исследования СФАЙРОС. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2020; 16 (3): 348-55. doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2020-06-06
  18. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. J Eur Communities 2001; L121: 33-44.
  19. Николаев Н.А., Мартынов А.И., Скирденко Ю.П., и др. Управление лечением на основе приверженности. Согласительный документ - Междисциплинарные рекомендации РНМОТ, НОГР, НАТГ, ОДН, ГОРАН, РОО, РОФ. Consilium Medicum. 2020; 22 (5): 9-18. doi: 10.26442/20751753.2020.5.200078
  20. Xu H, Zou J, Ye X, et al. Impacts of clinical pharmacist intervention on the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled clinical study. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10: 11122020. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01112
  21. Huffman M, Ali MK, Narayan KV. Should there be a different cardiovascular prevention polypill strategy for women and men? Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2011; 5: 280-6. doi: 10.1007/s12170-011-0161-9
  22. Singh K, Crossan C, Laba T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a fixed dose combination (polypill) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in India: within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the UMPIRE trial. Int J Cardiol 2018; 262: 71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.082
  23. Kesselheim AS, Misono AS, Lee JL, et al. Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease. A systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 300 (21): 251426. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.758
  24. Desai R, Sarpatwar A, Dejene S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of generic and brand-name medication use: A database study of US health insurance claims. PLoS Med 2019; 16 (3): e1002763. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.10027763
  25. Manzoli L, Flacco ME, Boccia S, et al. Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31: 351-68. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0104-8
  26. Khosravi AR, Pourmoghadas M, Ostovan M, et al. The impact of generic form of clopidogrel on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery stent: results of the OPCES study. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16 (5): 640-50. PMID: 22091287
  27. Tsoumani M, Kalantzi K, Dimitriou A, et al. Effect of clopidogrel besylate on platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Comparison with clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012; 13 (2): 149-58. doi: 10.1177/0003319711427697
  28. Ko D, Krumholz H, Tu J, et al. Clinical outcomes of plavix and generic clopidogrel for patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018; 11 (3): e004194. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes117.004194
  29. Hajizadeh R, Ghaffari S, Ziaee M, et al. In vitro inhibition of platelets aggregation with generic form of clopidogrel versus branded in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2017; 9 (4): 191-5. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2017.33
  30. Якусевич В.В., Петроченко А.С., Симонов В.С., и др. Влияние на дезагрегационную активность тромбоцитов оригинального и дженерического препаратов клопидогрела: результаты рандомизированного сравнительного перекрестного исследования. Клиницист. 2011; 4: 6470. doi: 10.17650/1818-8338-2011-4-64-70
  31. Ломоносова А.А., Мазур Н.А., Золозова Е.А., и др. Остаточная реактивность тромбоцитов на терапии ингибиторами циклооксигеназы или рецепторов аденозиндифосфата. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2012; 8 (2): 168-72
  32. Orange Book Preface. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/orange-book-preface. Accessed: 24.02.2021

Copyright (c) 2021 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies