The systematic analysis of idarucizumab administration prior to intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke patients in Russian Federation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Direct oral anticoagulants are preferentially used for the prevention of stroke compared to warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation because of their favorable risk-benefit profile. Approximately 1-2% of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation taking direct oral anticoagulants are expected to develop acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Thrombolytic treatment with i.v. recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is limited in such patients. Idarucizumab is a specific antagonist of dabigatran which completely reverses its anticoagulant activity within a few minutes and is reported to be used in the context of i.v. thrombolysis in AIS. Materials and methods. We performed the systematic review of all available clinical data of 9 cases of rtPA treatment following the administration of idarucizumab in Russian Federation starting from November 2019 until October 2020. Results. The median age of 9 patients (55.6% males) was 71 [59; 75] years. The median NIHSS score at admission was 15 [10; 16]; the median NIHSS score on day 10-14 after rtPA treatment 3 [2; 4]. A half of patients was modified Rankin scale (mRS) 2 and a half was mRS 3 on day 10-14 after the stroke. Brain infarction on CT developed in 7 patients 24 hours after trPA treatment, in 1 case there were no ischemic lesion on CT. Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) developed in 5 cases, 3 patients had no HT on CT scan. Conclusion. Idaricuzumab administration prior to rtPA thrombolysis appeared to be safe and feasible in AIS patients in comprehensive stroke units in Russian Federation.

About the authors

Maksim A. Domashenko

Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Clinical Hospital

Email: mdomashenko@gmail.com
канд. мед. наук, невролог, глав. врач Magnitogorsk, Russia

Mark A. Loskutnikov

Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Clinical Hospital

канд. мед. наук, невролог, рук. регионального сосудистого центра Magnitogorsk, Russia

References

  1. Otite FO, Khandelwal P, Chaturvedi S et al. Increasing atrial fibrillation prevalence in acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Neurology 2016; 87 (19): 2034-42.
  2. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (12): 1139-51.
  3. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (10): 883-91.
  4. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (11): 981-92.
  5. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (22): 2093-104.
  6. Mitchell A, Watson MC, Welsh T et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for People Aged 75 Years and over with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies. J Clin Med 2019; 8: E554.
  7. Alberts MJ, Eikelboom JW, Hankey GJ. Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11 (12): 1066-81.
  8. Seiffge DJ, Hooff RJ, Nolte CH et al. Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke patients: impact of prior treatment with novel oral anticoagulants on bleeding complications and outcome. Circulation 2015; 132 (13): 1261-9.
  9. Hankey GJ, Norrving B, Hacke W, Steiner T. Management of acute stroke in patients taking novel oral anticoagulants. Int J Stroke 2014; 9 (5): 627-32.
  10. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M et al. European Heart Rhythm Association. European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013; 15 (5): 625-51.
  11. Diener HC, Foerch C, Riess H et al. Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with thrombolysis or thrombectomy in patients receiving anti-thrombotic treatment. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12 (7): 677-88.
  12. Kate M, Szkotak A, Witt A et al. Proposed approach to thrombolysis in dabigatran-treated patients presenting with ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014; 23 (6): 1351-5.
  13. Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med 2015; 373 (6): 511-20.
  14. Shahjouei S, Tsivgoulis G, Bavarsad Shahripour R et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis among stroke patients taking new oral anticoagulants: case series and systematic review of reported cases. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 24 (12): 2685-93.
  15. Pikija S, Sztriha LK, Mutzenbach JS et al. Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence. CNS Drugs 2017; 31 (9): 747-57.
  16. Kermer P, Eschenfelder CC, Diener HC et al. Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany - Updated series of 120 cases. Int J Stroke 2020; 15 (6): 609-18.
  17. Реперфузионная терапия ишемического инсульта. Клинический протокол. М., 2019.
  18. Lip GY, Clemens A, Noack H et al. Patient outcomes using the European label for dabigatran. A post-hoc analysis from the RE-LY database. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: 933-42.
  19. Пудов Е.В., Сухачева Н.Н., Петелина И.С. Первый опыт тромболитической терапии инфаркта мозга в Российской Федерации после применения идаруцизумаба. Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2020; 12 (1): 68-71.

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies