Effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol 3 g (Ovea®) in antibacterial prevention of infectious and inflammatory complications of bipolar prostate enucleation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Rationale. Experience of successful of fosfomycin trometamol 3 g use in lower urinary tract infections treatment and remaining sensitivity of most microorganisms to fosfomycin lead up to this trial conduction. An open prospective study comparing effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol 3 g (Ovea®) use with standard antibacterial prevention of infectious and inflammatory complications of bipolar prostate enucleation. Materials and methods. Surgery was performed in 93 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in the period from June to September 2019 in D.D. Pletnev Municipal Clinical Hospital. The final analysis included 61 patients, the group was randomized into study group in which patients received Ovea® (fosfomycin trometamol 3 g) as antibacterial prevention before and after surgery and control group in which patients received intramuscular injections of ceftriaxone 1000 mg 2 times a day. Baseline clinical parameters including symptoms, results of urodynamic, ultrasound, and laboratory studies were similar in both study groups. In all patients transurethral bipolar prostate enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia was performed. Results. Functional results of treatment were similar in both groups. Hyperthermia more than 37.5°С was observed in (37%) in study group, and in 13 (42%) in control group. Antimicrobial drug was changed in 4 patients in study group and in 6 patients in control group. There were no cases of antimicrobial drug discontinuation associated with adverse events development. During the first month after surgery 3 patients in study group and in 4 patients in control group developed clinical symptoms of chronic prostatitis exacerbation and 1 patient in control group developed left sided epididymo-orchitis (С-DII). Diarrhea developed in 1 patient in control group an the 4th day, and in 3 patients in control group, rash - in 2 patients in control group, headache - in 1 patient, and 1 patient complained of upper abdomen discomfort after second fosfomycin intake. Six patients in control group developed injection site pain, and 3 patients gave up on antibacterial therapy after 4 days. Conclusion. Effectiveness and safety results of Ovea® use allow us to recommend its use as a medication for antibacterial prevention and treatment after transurethral anatomic prostate enucleation. Key words: benign prostatic hyperplasia, fosfomycin, antibacterial prevention. For citation: Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V. Effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol 3 g (Ovea®) in antibacterial prevention of infectious and inflammatory complications of bipolar prostate enucleation. Consilium Medicum. 2020; 22 (6): 58-63. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2020.6.200243

About the authors

Alexey G. Martov

Federal Medical Biological Agencies’ State Institute of Continuous Medical Education named after A.I. Burnazyan; Department of Urology, D.D. Pletnev’s Moscow Municipal City Hospital

Email: martovalex@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., зав. каф. урологии и андрологии

Dmitry V. Ergakov

Department of Urology, D.D. Pletnev’s Moscow Municipal City Hospital

канд. мед. наук, доц. каф. урологии и андрологии

References

  1. Мартов А.Г., Ергаков Д.В., Андронов А.С. Трансуретральная электроэнуклеация доброкачественной гиперплазии предстательной железы. Урология. 2014; 5: 95-101.
  2. Еникеев Д.В., Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г. Сравнительный анализ тулиевого и гольмиевого лазера в лечении рецидивов доброкачественной гиперплазии предстательной железы. Урология. 2017; 4: 50-4.
  3. Ергаков Д.В., Мартов А.Г. Комбинированная терапия расстройств мочеиспускания после трансуретральной резекции предстательной железы. Урология. 2018; 1: 72-80.
  4. Мартов А.Г., Меринов Д.С., Корниенко С.И. Послеоперационные урологические осложнения трансуретральных операций на предстательной железе. Урология. 2006; 2: 25-32.
  5. Bonkat G, Pickard R et al. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Copenhagen 2018.
  6. Pittet D. Healthcare-associated infection: moving behind headlines to clinical solutions. J Hosp Infect 2009; 73: 293-5.
  7. Concia E, Azzini АМ. Aetiology and antibiotic resistance issues regarding urological procedures. J Chemother 2014; 26 (1): 14-23.
  8. Periti P, Novelli A, Reali EF et al. Prophylactic chemotherapy with fosfomycin trometamol salt in transurethral prostatectomy. A controlled clinical trial; in Neu HC, Williams JD (eds): New Trends in Urinary Tract Infections. The Single-Dose Therapy International Symposium, Rome, January 1987. Basel, Karger, 1988; p. 207-33.
  9. Baert L, Billiet I, Vandepitte J. Prophylactic chemotherapy with fosfomycin trometamol versus placebo during transurethral prostatic resection. Infection 1990; 18 (Suppl. 2): S103-S106.
  10. Fosfomycin Trometamol. Product Monograph. Milan, Springer Healthcare Italia, 2012.
  11. Wagenlehner F, Thomas P, Naber K et al. Fosfomycin Trometamol (3,000 mg) in Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Healthcare-Associated Infections after Endourological Interventions: A Narrative Review. Urol Int 2014; 92: 125-30.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).