Possibilities of modern combined pharmacotherapy using fosinopril in patients with a combined cardiovascular pathology under conditions of ambulatory practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To conduct a comprehensive comparative assessment of the effectiveness of typical outpatient practice and active combination pharmacotherapy in patients with combined cardiovascular pathology. Materials and methods. Вata obtained from 100 patients aged 45-65 years with concomitant cardiovascular pathology: arterial hypertension of 2-3 grades, stable angina pectoris (I-III functional class), chronic heart failure (I-III functional class). The study was carried out for 32 weeks in 2 stages: at the beginning of the first (observational) stage (1st control point), the patient was initially taken and the initial pharmacotherapy was determined in a typical outpatient practice; 8 weeks after the start of investigation (2nd control point), the efficacy and safety of typical outpatient practice pharmacotherapy were monitored. The intervention was changed using the study scheme (2nd stage, low-interventional). At the end of the 24th week of the intervention, a final evaluation of the results of the study included fosinopril was performed (3rd control point). Results. In the process of implementing typical outpatient practice and active pharmacotherapeutic intervention in patients, a statistically significant improvement in the main studied clinical indicators was revealed, while combined pharmacotherapy was tolerated satisfactorily by all patients. 27% of patients achieved target levels of plod pressure, so their transfer to the strategy of active pharmacotherapeutic intervention was not required. During the second stage of the study, statistically significant positive dynamics rampared to typical outpatient practice were revealed: according to the main indicators of the serum lipoprotein spectrum, daily monitoring of blood pressure and ECG, sonographic parameters of the left ventricle, dynamics of life quality, as well as anxiety and depression scales. Conclusion. The data obtained once again confirm that modern pharmacotherapy containing ACE inhibitors as a blocker of RAAS is a first-line therapy in high-risk patients with cardiovascular pathology and they certainly speak in favor of combined therapy in comorbid patients in combination with hypertension, CHD and CHF. Key words: combined cardiovascular pathology, outpatient practice, fosinopril, pharmacotherapy. For citation: Luneva Ju.V., Povetkin S.V., Kornilov A.A. Possibilities of modern combined pharmacotherapy using fosinopril in patients with a combined cardiovascular pathology under conditions of ambulatory practice. Consilium Medicum. 2020; 22 (5): 67-72. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2020.5.200209

About the authors

Julia V. Luneva

Kursk State Medical University

Email: mocva@rambler.ru
доц. каф. клинической фармакологии Kursk, Russia

Sergey V. Povetkin

Kursk State Medical University

Email: mocva@rambler.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., зав. каф. клинической фармакологии Kursk, Russia

Arsen A. Kornilov

Kursk State Medical University

Email: mocva@rambler.ru
доц. каф. клинической фармакологии Kursk, Russia

References

  1. Артериальная гипертония у взрослых. Клинические рекомендации. 2020. http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/#!/ recomend/687
  2. Цыганкова Д.П., Федорова Н.В. Отдельные социально-экономические аспекты риска артериальной гипертензии. Артериальная гипертензия. 2020; 26 (2): 155-62.
  3. Черняева М.С., Остроумова О.Д. Целевые уровни артериального давления у пациентов с артериальной гипертензией и ишемической болезнью сердца. Артериальная гипертензия. 2020; 26 (1): 15-26. doi: 10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-1-15-26
  4. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (33): 3021-104.
  5. Артериальная гипертония у взрослых. Клинические рекомендации. 2016. http://webmed.irkutsk.ru/doc/pdf/fedhypert.pdf
  6. Парахонский А.П. Оценка качества жизни больных артериальной гипертонией. Фундаментальные исследования. 2006; 12: 33-4.
  7. Безуглова Е.И., Лунева Ю.В., Филиппенко Н.Г. и др. Состояние психоэмоционального статуса и качество жизни у больных с сочетанной сердечно-сосудистой патологией в условиях реальной клинической практики. Курский научно-практический вестн. «Человек и его здоровье». 2013; 4: 55-7.
  8. Рогоза А.Н., Никольский В.П., Ощепкова Е.В. и др. Суточное мониторирование артериального давления при гипертонии. Методические вопросы. 2016. https://www.incart.ru/assets/pdf/sut-mon-ad.pdf
  9. Тихоненко В.М. Формирование клинического заключения по данным холтеровского мониторирования. Пособие для врачей. 2000.
  10. Devereux RB et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparizon to nekropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149 (86)90771
  11. Куликов В.П., Доронина Н.Л., Орлова А.Ф. и др. Клиническая патофизиология и функциональная диагностика. 2004.
  12. Лелюк В.Г., Лелюк С.Э. Ультразвуковая ангиология. 2007.
  13. Ивлева А.Я., Сивкова Е.Б. Роль ингибиторов ангиотензинпревращающего фермента в превентивной терапии пациентов с высоким риском сердечно-сосудистых осложнений. Справочник поликлинического врача. 2009; 4: 15-8.
  14. Dihn DT, Frauman AG, Jonston CI, Fabiani CI. Angiotensin receptors: distribution, signaling and function. Clinical Sci 2001; 100: 481-92. doi: 10.1042/cs1000481
  15. Карпов Ю.А. Фозиноприл при лечении артериальной гипертонии (ФЛАГ): российская программа оценки практической достижимости целевых уровней артериального давления. РМЖ. 2001; 9 (10): 406-10.
  16. Souza AC, Borges JW, Moreira TM. Quality of life and treatment adherence in hypertensive patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica 2016; 50: 71.
  17. Li Z, Li Y, Chen L et al. Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94 (31): e1317.
  18. Meng Y, Zhang Z, Liang X et al. Effects of combination therapy with amlodipine and fosinopril administered at different times on blood pressure and circadian blood pressure pattern in patients with essential hypertension. Acta Cardiol 2010; 65 (3): 309-14. doi: 10.2143/AC.65.3.2050347
  19. Xue C, Zhou C, Yang B et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety between benidipine and hydrochlorothiazide in fosinopril-treated hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (2): e013672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013672
  20. Flaten HK, Monte AA. The Pharmacogenomic and Metabolomic Predictors of ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Effectiveness and Safety. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017; 31 (4): 471-82. doi: 10.1007/s10557-017-6733-2
  21. Expanded table: Some drugs for HFrEF. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2019; 61 (1569): e57-e62.
  22. Ashcheulova T, Gerasimchuk N, Rezunenko Y et al. Pathogenetic advances of fosinopril sodium with hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients. Georgian Med News 2017; (271): 55-61. PMID: 29099702.

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies