Management of patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus from the standpoint of modern recommendations and in real clinical practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Our aim was to assess the accordance of treatment of patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus (CHF+DM) in real clinical practice with current guidelines and its association with prognosis. Materials and methods. We analyzed 2144 cases of patients admitted to а hospital due to decompensation of CHF in the period from 2014-2018. 207 (9.7%) of these patients had CHF with a left ventricular ejection fraction of <45% and type 2 diabetes [median of age was 69 (interquartile range of 62; 77) years]. The analysis of recommended medications at discharge and survival was performed. Results. Аngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed to 132 (63.7%) patients: enalapril - 61 (29.4%), perindopril - 42 (20.3%), fosinopril - 29 (14.0%). The angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan was prescribed to 10 (4.8%) patients. Beta-blockers were prescribed to 188 (90.8%) patients: bisoprolol - 149 (72.0%), metoprolol succinate - 2 (1%), carvedilol - 1 (0.5%). In addition, 36 (17.4%) patients were prescribed metoprolol tartrate not recommended for the treatment of heart failure. Diuretic therapy was prescribed in 200 (96.6%) patients: furosemide - 177 (85.5%), torasemide - 22 (10.6%), indapamide - 1 (0.5%). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone was recommended 165 (79.7%) patients. Despite the persistence of heart failure III-IV NYHA functional class despite combined medical treatment in 95.1% of patients, the angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor and/or If-channel blockers and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy weren’t recommended. For glycemic control, metformin was prescribed to 28 (13.5%) patients, gliclazide SR - 53 (25.6%), insulin - 59 (28.5%); combination of metformin and gliclazide SR - 4 (1.9%), metformin and insulins - 5 (2.4%), gliclazide SR and insulins - 5 (2.4%), glimepiride and insulins - 3 (1.5%) patient. During 132 (92; 200) weeks follow up after discharge 107 (67.3%) patients died. The number of deaths was less - 19 (35.2%) in the group of patients whom the therapy in accordance with guidelines was prescribed and who were compliant compared to 88 (83.8%) deaths in others - p (x2)<0.000001. Conclusion. In order to improve the prognosis in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice, it is necessary to carry out treatment strictly in accordance with current guidelines and use the modern achievements in cardiology, including ARNI, If-channel blockers, CPT and etc. Key words: chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, guidelines, reduced and middle left ventricular ejection fraction, drug therapy, prognosis, real practice. For citation: Reznik E.V., Lazarev V.A., Kalova M.R., Nikitin I.G. Management of patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus from the standpoint of modern recommendations and in real clinical practice. Consilium Medicum. 2020; 22 (5): 50-56. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2020.5.200198

About the authors

Elena V. Reznik

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: elenaresnik@gmail.com
д-р мед. наук, проф. каф. госпитальной терапии

Vladimir A. Lazarev

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

аспирант каф. госпитальной терапии

Marina R. Kalova

Buyanov City Clinical Hospital; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

врач ГБУЗ «ГКБ им. В.М. Буянова», аспирант каф. госпитальной терапии

Igor G. Nikitin

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; National Medical Research Center "Treatment and rehabilitation center"

д-р мед. наук, проф., зав. каф. госпитальной терапии

References

  1. Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390 (10100): 1211-59. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2
  2. Мареев В.Ю., Фомин И.В., Агеев Ф.Т. и др. Клинические рекомендации. Профилактика, диагностика и лечение хронической сердечной недостаточности (и острой декомпенсации). 2018.
  3. Cho NM, Kirigia J, Ogurtsova K et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabet Res Clin Pract 2017; 128: 40-50.
  4. Починка И.Г. Сахарный диабет 2-го типа и хроническая сердечная недостаточность - «несладкая парочка». Мед. альманах. 2017; 6: 103-18.
  5. Seferovic PM, Ponikowski P, Anker SD et al. Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2019. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1531
  6. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (27): 2129-200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
  7. Мареев В.Ю., Фомин И.В., Агеев Ф.Т. и др. Клинические рекомендации ОССН-РКО-РНМОТ. Сердечная недостаточность: хроническая (ХСН) и острая декомпенсированная (ОДСН). Диагностика, профилактика и лечение. Кардиология. 2018; с. 8-164. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2475
  8. Мареев В.Ю., Агеев Ф.Т., Арутюнов Г.П. и др. Национальные рекомендации ОССН, РКО и РНМОТ по диагностике и лечению ХСН (четвертый пересмотр). Сердечная недостаточность. 2013; с. 379-472.
  9. Моисеев В.С., Мухин Н.А., Смирнов А.В и др. Сердечно-сосудистый риск и хроническая болезнь почек: стратегии кардио-нефропротекции. Рос. кардиологический журн. 2014; с. 7-37.
  10. Seferovic PM, Petrie MC, Filippatos GS et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2018; 20 (5): 853-72. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2014-8-7-37
  11. Лапина Ю.В., Нарусов О.Ю., Мареев В.Ю и др. Эффективность и безопасность применения метформина у больных ХСН и СД типа 2. Результаты исследования «Рациональная Эффективная многокомпонентная терапия в борьбе с сахарным диабетом у больных с ХСН» (РЭМБО-СД ХСН). Кардиология. 2008; 48 (3): 50-8.
  12. Арутюнов А.Г., Рылова А.К., Арутюнов Г.П. Регистр госпитализированных пациентов с декомпенсацией кровообращения (Павловский регистр). Сообщение 1. Современная клиническая характеристика пациента с декомпенсацией кровообращения. Клинические фенотипы пациентов. Сердечная Недостаточность. 2014; 82 (1): 23-31.
  13. Фомин И.В. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность в Российской Федерации: что сегодня мы знаем и что должны делать. Рос. кардиологический журн. 2016; 8 (136): 7-13. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-7-13
  14. Ребров А.П., Кошелева Н.А. Влияние терапевтического обучения и активного амбулаторного ведения пациентов с ХСН на их клиническое состояние и сердечно-сосудистые осложнения (трехлетнее наблюдение). Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2011; 7 (3): 27587. doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2011-7-3-275-287
  15. Sato T, Yamauchi H, Suzuki S et al. The Prognositic Significance of Serial Renal Function Measurements in Chronic Heart Failure. J Gen Practice 2014; 2 (3): 1-6. doi: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000156
  16. Nieminen MS, Brutsaert D, Dickstein K et al. EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients: description of population. Eur Heart J 2006; 27 (22): 272536. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl193

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies