A modern view of prostate biopsy
- Authors: Demin A.A1, Govorov A.V1, Vasilyev A.O1, Okishev A.V1, Kim Y.A1, Pushkar D.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 20, No 7 (2018)
- Pages: 11-14
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2075-1753/article/view/94966
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/2075-1753_2018.7.11-14
- ID: 94966
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. A Demin
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: lavahead@mail.ru
аспирант каф. урологии 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
A. V Govorov
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: dr.govorov@gmail.com
д-р мед. наук, проф. каф. урологии 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
A. O Vasilyev
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: alexvasilyev@me.com
канд. мед. наук, ассистент каф. урологии 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
A. V Okishev
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: okishev.art@gmail.com
ординатор каф. урологии 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
Yu. A Kim
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: dockimyura@gmail.com
ординатор каф. урологии 127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
D. Yu Pushkar
A.I.Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: pushkardm@mail.ru
127473, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Delegatskaia, d. 20, str. 1
References
- Rebecca L, Siegel M.P.H, Kimberly D et al. Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7-30.
- Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2015 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д.Каприна, В.В.Старинского, Г.В.Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А.Герцена - филиал ФГБУ «НМИРЦ» Минздрава России, 2017.
- Mettlin C, Murphy G.P, Babaian R.J et al. The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer 1996; 77(1): 150-9.
- Xue J, Qin Z, Cai H et al. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8 (14): 23322-36.
- Guichard G, Larreґ S, Gallina A et al. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 430-5.
- Berger A.P, Gozzi C, Steiner H et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol 2004; 171: 1478-80.
- Gao Y, Liao X.H, Lu L et al. Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the detection of diffuse prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2016; 71 (3): 258-64.
- Rohrbach D, Wodlinger B, Wen J et al. High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 4: S0301-5629(18)30080-2.
- Ghai S, Eure G, Fradet V. Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification. J Urol 2016; 196 (2): 562-9.
- Ghai S, Van der Kwast T. Suspicious findings on micro-ultrasound imaging and early detection of prostate cancer. Urol Case Reports 2018; 16: 98-100.
- Salomon G, Schiffmann J. Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2014; 15: 392.
- Aigner F, Pallwein L, Junker D et al. Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol 2010; 184: 913-7.
- Salomon G, Drews N, Autier P et al. Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real-time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10-core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients. BJU Int 2014; 113: 548-53.
- Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B et al. Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol 2015; 193: 794-800.
- Васильев А.О., Говоров А.В., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Гистосканирование предстательной железы у пациентов, перенесших криоаблацию простаты. Качество. Инновации. Образование. Научно-практическая конференция «Роботические технологии в медицине». 2016: 9-14.
- Braeckman J, Autier P, Garbar C et al. Computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 101: 293-8.
- Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Садченко А.В. и др. Роль гистосканирования предстательной железы в выявлении рака простаты. Consilium Medicum. 2015; 17 (7): 8-11.
- Schiffmann J, Tennstedt P, Fischer J et al. Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate. World J Urol 2014; 32: 925-30.
- Glybochko P.V, Alyaev Y.G, Amosov A.V et al. Evaluation of Prostate HistoScanning as a Method for Targeted Biopsy in Routine Practice. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 19: S2405-4569(17)30172-4.
- Hamann M.F, Meyer D, Knüpfer S. Application of ultrasound imaging biomarkers (HistoScanning™) improves staging reliability of prostate biopsies. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10 (1): 579.
- Bratan F, Niaf E, Melodelima C et al. Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2019.
- Wegelin O, van Melick H.H.E, Hooft L et al. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique? Eur Urol 2017; 71 (4): 517-31.
- Friedl A, Schneeweiss J, Sevcenco S et al. In-bore 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Repeat Biopsy Population: Diagnostic Performance, Complications, and Learning Curve. Urology 2018; 114: 139-46.
- Baco E, Ukimura O, Rud E et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 787-94.
- Dickinson L, Hu Y, Ahmed H.U et al. Image-directed, tissue-preserving focal therapy of prostate cancer: a feasibility study of a novel deformable magnetic resonance-ultrasound (MR-US) registration system. BJU Int 2013; 112: 594-601.
- Da Rosa M.R, Milot L, Sugar L et al. A prospective comparison of MRI-US fused targeted biopsy versus systematic ultrasound-guided biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients on active surveillance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41: 220-5.
- Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko A.S, Borghi M et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018.
- Lopci E, Saita A, Lazzeri M et al. 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men with Contraindications to or Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Observational Study. J Urol 2018; pii: S0022-5347(18)30172-1.
- Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2015; 68 (1): 8-19.