Current aspects of glycemic control in young children with diabetes mellitus


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Due to growth of prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM 1) among young children new ISPAD (International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes) Consensus on Managing diabetes in preschool children was developed. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c level for preschool children is recommended to keep below 7.5%. Basic causes of non-reaching of glycemic goals are considered unpredictability of meals and physical activity in young children, fear of parents in front of hypoglycemia, glycemic variability. Reaching the goals is supported by positive attitude to self-control procedures, education of patients’ relatives taking into account the age of a child, precise glycemic control from the first months of disease. For satisfactory glycemic control it is recommended to measure glycaemia 7-10 times per day; to use only the most precise glucometers; to teach patient family members correct exploitation of glucometer. Grownups should encourage self-dependence of a child, but all of such manipulations should be controlled by grownups. In the article own data are given - results of 30 patients questionnaire on glycosylated hemoglobin level, age when they stated to use glucometer themselves, frequency of glycaemia measurements.

About the authors

A. V Vitebskaya

I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: dr.vitebskaya@gmail.com
канд. мед. наук, доц. каф. детских болезней лечебного фак-та, зав. детским эндокринологическим отд-нием УДКБ 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, ul. Trubetskaia, d. 8, str. 2

References

  1. Craig M.E, Jefferies C, Dabelea D. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines? 2014. Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15 (Suppl. 20): 4-17. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12186
  2. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков: консенсус ISPAD по клинической практике, 2014. Пер. с англ. под ред. В.А.Петерковой. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016.
  3. Sundberg F, Barnard K, Cato A. et al. Managing diabetes in preschool children. Pediatr Diabetes 2017; Jul 20. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12554
  4. Rewers M.J, Pillay K, de Beaufort C. et al; ISPAD. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15 (Suppl. 20): 102-14. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12190
  5. Chiang J.L, Kirkman M.S, Laffel L.M, Peters A.L. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (7): 2034-54. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1140
  6. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence). Type 1 diabetes: diagnosis and management of type 1 diabetes in children, young people and adults. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2015. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng18. Accessed 18 June 2017
  7. Wood J.R, Miller K.M, Maahs D.M. et al; T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes clinical guidelines. Diabetes Care 2013; 36 (7): 2035-7. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1959
  8. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes, 2012. Diabetes Care 2012; 35 (Suppl. 1): S11-63. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s011. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s011
  9. Bailey T.S, Grunberger G, Bode B.W. et al; AACE; ACE. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology 2016 outpatient glucose monitoring statement. Endocr Pract 2016; 22 (2): 231-61. doi: 10.4158/EP151124.CS
  10. Cengiz E, Xing D, Wong J.C. et al. Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis among youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Pediatr Diabetes 2013; 14 (6): 447-54. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12030
  11. Mauras N, Mazaika P, Buckingham B et al. Longitudinal assessment of neuroanatomical and cognitive differences in young children with type 1 diabetes: association with hyperglycemia. Diabetes 2015; 64 (5): 1770-9. doi: 10.2337/db14-1445
  12. Soupal J, Skrha J.Jr., Fajmon M. et al. Glycemic variability is higher in type 1 diabetes patients with microvascular complications irrespective of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16 (4): 198-203. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0205
  13. Lange K, Swift P, Pankowska E, Danne T. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines, 2014. Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15 (Suppl. 20): 77-85. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12187
  14. DCCT Research Group (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-86.
  15. Donaghue K.C, Wadwa R.P, Dimeglio L.A. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15 (Suppl. 20): 257-69. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12180
  16. Sundberg F, Forsander G. Detection and treatment efficacy of hypoglycemic events in the everyday life of children younger than 7 yr. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15: 34-40. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12057. Epub 2013 Jun 27
  17. Maahs D.M, Hermann J.M, DuBose S.N. et al. Contrasting the clinical care and outcomes of 2,622 children with type 1 diabetes less than 6 years of age in the United States T1D Exchange and German/Austrian DPV registries. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 1578-85. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3272-2
  18. ISO-15197-2013. In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (15.05.2013).
  19. ГОСТ Р ИСО-15197-2015. Тест-системы для диагностики in vitro. Требования к системам мониторинга глюкозы в крови для самоконтроля при лечении сахарного диабета.
  20. Caswell M, Frank J, Viggiani M.T. et al. Morin R Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015; 3: 1-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0129
  21. Tansey M, Laffel L, Cheng J et al. Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2011; 28 (9): 1118-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03368.x
  22. Tsalikian E, Fox L, Weinzimer S. et al. Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2012; 13 (4): 301-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00837.x
  23. Mauras N, Beck R, Xing D. et al; Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. A randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes in young children aged 4 to 10 years. Diabetes Care 2012; 35 (2): 204-10. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1746
  24. Tsalikian E, Fox L, Weinzimer S. et al. Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2012; 13: 301-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00837.x

Copyright (c) 2017 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies