The use of the method of robotic kinesitherapy in patients with sequelae of stroke

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Recovering gait skills is one of the most important tasks of rehabilitation of post-stroke patients. In recent years robotic devices have been used extensively in physical rehabilitation for the gait recovery. The article presents the results of the study of efficiency of using robotic kinesiotherapy in complex rehabilitation of patients after stroke. There were organized medical examinations of 50 patients, including 50 in the main group with the use of the robotic complex ‘Locomat’ and 42 patient in control group with the use of conventional physical therapy. As a result, there are statistical differences in regard to the indices of mobility, motor skills and sensitivity in paretic limb, strength and muscle tone in paretic limbs, as well as the overall improvement of daily activity. It has been determined that the use of robotic devices has positive impact in rehabilitation of post-stroke patients.

About the authors

V. A Bronnikov

Academician E.A.Wagner Perm State University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Perm Regional Complex Rehabilitation Centre

Email: bronnikov66@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., зав. каф. физической культуры и здоровья с курсами медико-социальной и физической реабилитации ФПК и ППС ФГБОУ ВО «ПГМУ им. академика Е.А.Вагнера», дир. КГАУ «Центр комплексной реабилитации инвалидов», врач-невролог, гл. внештатный специалист по реабилитации Минздрава Пермского края 614990, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaia, d. 26; 614094, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Sviazistov, d. 11a

V. B Smychek

Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Medical Expertise and Rehabilitation

Email: priemnaia.meir@mail.ru
д-р мед наук, дир. ГУ «РНПЦ медицинской экспертизы и реабилитации» 223027, Republic of Belarus, Minskaia obl., Minskii r-n, pos. Gorodishche

Yu. A Mavlikaeva

Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise Krai in Perm

Email: mavlikaeva@mail.ru
д-р мед. наук, врач по МСЭ, нач. организационно-методического отд. ФКУ ГБ МСЭ по Пермскому краю 614010, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Komsomol'skii pr-t, d. 77

Yu. I Kravtzov

Academician E.A.Wagner Perm State University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

чл.-кор. РАЕ, д-р мед. наук, проф. ФГБОУ ВО «ПГМУ им. академика Е.А.Вагнера», засл. деят. науки РФ 614990, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaia, d. 26

K. A Sklyannaya

Academician E.A.Wagner Perm State University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Perm Regional Complex Rehabilitation Centre

Email: skks1008@mail.ru
аспирант каф. физической культуры и здоровья с курсом медико-социальной и физической реабилитации ФПК и ППС ФГБОУ ВО «ПГМУ им. академика Е.А.Вагнера», врач-невролог КГАУ «Центр комплексной реабилитации инвалидов» 614990, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaia, d. 26; 614094, Russian Federation, Perm, ul. Sviazistov, d. 11a

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380 (9859): 2095-128. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0.
  2. Плотникова О.А., Мавликаева Ю.А. Анализ инвалидности взрослого населения Пермского края вследствие инсульта. Проблемы соц. гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2014; 2: 17-9.
  3. Westlake K, Patten C. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual - assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post - stroke. J Neuro Engineering Rehabilitation 2009; 6 (1): 18. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18
  4. Huang V, Krakauer J. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuro Engineering Rehabilitation 2009; 6 (1): 5. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5.
  5. Кравцов Ю.И., Бронников В.А., Вильдеман А.В. и др. Эффективность комплексной кинезиотерапии у пациентов с тяжелыми двигательными нарушениями. Физиотерапия, бальнеология и реабилитация. 2013; 5: 48-9.
  6. Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C et al. Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Stroke 2007; 38 (2): 349-54. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000254607.48765.cb
  7. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurology 2009; 8 (8): 741-54. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4
  8. Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C et al. Electromechanical-Assisted Training for Walking After Stroke: Updated Evidence. Stroke 2013; 44 (10): e127-e128. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.003061
  9. Meiner Z, Fisher I, Katz-Leurer M et al. The Effectiveness of Locomotor Therapy Using Robotic - assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PM&R 2009; 1 (9): S99. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.08.004
  10. Geroin C, Mazzoleni S, Smania N et al. Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke. J Rehabilitation Med 2013; 45 (10): 987-96. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1234
  11. Van Nunen M, Gerrits K, Konijnenbelt M et al. Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Disabil Rehabil: Assistive Technology 2015; 10 (2): 141-8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.873489
  12. Dundar U, Toktas H, Solak O et al. A Comparative Study of Conventional Physiotherapy Versus Robotic Training Combined with Physiotherapy in Patients with Stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2014; 21 (6): 453-61. doi: 10.1310/tsr2106-453
  13. Черникова Л.А., Клочков А.С. Влияние тренировок на роботизированной системе Lokomat на мобильность при ходьбе у пациентов с постинсультными гемипарезами. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2014; 3: 13-7.
  14. Bronnikov V.A, Sklyannaya K.A. Possibilities of Medical and Social Rehabilitation After Stroke; International Neurorehabilitation Symposium 2013; September 11-13, 2013; Zurich, Switzerland. http://www.inrs2013.com/fileadmin/user_upload/posters/12_Bronnikov_et_al_INRS_2013.pdf
  15. Rosa M, Marques A, Demain S, Metcalf C. Knee posture during gait and global functioning post - stroke: a theoretical ICF framework using current measures in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37 (10): 904-13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.948132
  16. Sivan M, O’Connor R, Makower S et al. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot - assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabilitation Med 2011; 43 (3): 181-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0674

Copyright (c) 2017 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies