Analysis of the effect of blue laser radiation on the structure of the auditory ossicles and audiological results of stapedoplasty
- Authors: Svistushkin V.M.1, Demura T.A.1, Avraamova S.T.1, Sinkov E.V.1, Sobolev V.P.1, Tekoev A.R.1, Zinchenko I.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 27, No 9 (2025): Otorhinolaryngology and pulmonology
- Pages: 531-537
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2075-1753/article/view/356629
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2025.9.203207
- ID: 356629
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Studies show that from 0.1 to 1% of the population suffers from otosclerosis, manifested by hearing loss and ear noise. Surgical treatment is performed using stapedoplasty, but there is always a risk of sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness and facial nerve paralysis. The laser method of stapedoplasty can reduce the risks, but it is also associated with potential negative consequences. Our study is aimed at analyzing the histological changes in the auditory ossicles after exposure to a diode blue laser with a wavelength of 445 nm.
Aim. To evaluate microstructural (histological) changes in the auditory bones (in particular the base of the stirrup) during stapedoplasty using a diode blue laser; to analyze the size of perforations in bone tissue and identify the effects of thermal effects on neighboring intact structures.
Materials and methods. To histologically assess the safety of using a diode laser with a wavelength of 445 nm, an experimental study was conducted on frozen human auditory bones. Laser exposure was performed on different areas of the bones with different parameters of power and exposure time, selected on the basis of previous studies. After exposure, the samples were fixed in a formalin solution and sent for histological analysis.
Results. The effect of thermal exposure, represented by areas of necrosis surrounded by perforated holes, showed values from 487 to 727 µm, with an average value of 608.6±91.5 µm. These data emphasize the focused nature of thermal exposure, while the preserved areas around bone defects did not reveal morphological differences with stirrup bones in the control group.
Conclusion. Microstructural measurements provided important information about the size of perforations and thermal effects, and histological analysis of the auditory ossicles confirmed their relative resistance to laser exposure, and thus the safety of exposure to the structures of the middle and inner ear. These results will be useful for further improvement of laser stapedoplasty techniques and increase its safety.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Valery M. Svistushkin
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7414-1293
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, MoscowTatiana A. Demura
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6946-6146
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, MoscowSofya T. Avraamova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9704-5915
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowEduard V. Sinkov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4870-5977
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowVasiliy P. Sobolev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7372-3299
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowArtur R. Tekoev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9511-9212
Graduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowIgor A. Zinchenko
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: svvm3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-6499-5659
Аssistant
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Преображенский H.A., Патякина O.K. Тугоухость при отосклерозе. В кн.: Тугоухость. М.: Медицина, 1978; с. 221-36 [Preobrazhenskii HA, Patiakina OK. Tugoukhost pri otoskleroze. In: Tugoukhost. Moscow: Meditsina, 1978. P. 221-36 (in Russian)].
- Pauli N, Strömbäck K, Lundman L, Dahlin-Redfors Y. Surgical technique in stapedotomy hearing outcome and complications. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(3):790-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.28072
- Гадян А.Т., Янов Ю.К., Левинина М.В., Аникин И.А. Анализ результатов стапедопластики, выполненной традиционном способом и с помощью лазера, при отосклерозе и адгезивном отите. Российская оториноларингология. 2008;(2):216-20 [Gadian AT, Ianov IuK, Levinina MV, Anikin IA. Analiz rezultatov stapedoplastiki, vypolnennoi traditsionnom sposobom i s pomoshchiu lazera, pri otoskleroze i adgezivnom otite. Rossiiskaia otorinolaringologiia. 2008;(2):216-20 (in Russian)].
- Garin P, Van Prooyen-Keyser S, Jamart J. Hearing outcome following laser-assisted stapes surgery. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31(1):31-4. doi: 10.2310/7070.2002.19196
- Parida PK, Kalaiarasi R, Gopalakrishnan S. Diode Laser Stapedotomy vs Conventional Stapedotomy in Otosclerosis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(6):1099-105. doi: 10.1177/0194599816635132
- Malafronte G, Filosa B, Barillari MR. Stapedotomy: is the color of the footplate important in the choice of the type of perforator? Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(7):1047-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1ccc
- Boyev KP. Use of Lasers in Otosclerosis Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018;51(2):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.11.009
- Haberkamp TJ, Harvey SA, Khafagy Y. Revision stapedectomy with and without the CO2 laser: an analysis of results. Am J Otol. 1996;17(2):225-9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8723952/ Assessed: 01.03.2025.
- Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Roberson JB, De La Cruz A. Comparison of argon and CO2 laser stapedotomy in primary otosclerosis surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21(4):227-30. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2000.8380
- Motta G, Moscillo L. Functional results in stapedotomy with and without CO(2) laser. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002;64(5):307-10. doi: 10.1159/000066079
- Shabana Y, Allam H, Pedersen C. Laser stapedotomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113(5):413-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100144111
- Barbara M, Lazzarino AI, Murè C, et al. Laser Versus Drill-Assisted Stapedotomy for the Treatment of Otosclerosis: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Journal of International Advanced Otology. 2011;7:283-8. Available at: https://www.advancedotology.org/en/laser-versus-drill-assisted-stapedotomy-for-the-treatment-of-otosclerosis-a-randomized-controlled-trial-161193. Assessed: 01.03.2025.
- Vincent R, Bittermann AJN, Oates J, et al. KTP Versus CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy for Primary Otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(6):928-33. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f24ff
- Fang L, Lin H, Zhang TY, Tan J. Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(4):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.12.014
- Yavuz H, Caylakli F, Ozer F, Ozluoglu LN. Reliability of microdrill stapedotomy: comparison with pick stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:998-1001. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31815a3548
- Young E, Mitchell-Innes A, Jindal M. Lasers in stapes surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(7):627-33. doi: 10.1017/s0022215115001280
- Perkins RC. Laser stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope. 1980;90(2):228-40. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198002000-00007
- Casazza GC, Thomas AJ, Dewey J, et al. Variations in stapes surgery cost within a multihospital network. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(5):835-41. doi: 10.1177/0194599819855055
- Frenz M. Physical characteristics of various lasers used in stapes surgery. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;65:237-49. doi: 10.1159/000098838
- Young E, Mitchell-Innes A, Jindal M. Lasers in stapes surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(7):627-33. doi: 10.1017/s0022215115001280
- Wegner I, Kamalski DM, Tange RA, et al. Laser versus conventional fenestration in stapedotomy for otosclerosis: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):1687-93. doi: 10.1002/lary.24514
- Fang L, Lin H, Zhang TY, Tan J. Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(4):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.12.014
- Bartel R, Huguet G, Cruellas F, et al. Laser vs drill for footplate fenestration during stapedotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hearing results. Eur Arch Otolaryngol. 2021;278:9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06117-1
- Smyth G, Hassard Т. Eighteen years of experience with stapedotomy, the case of small fenestra operation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1978;49:87-92. doi: 10.1177/00034894780870s301
- Langman A, Lindeman R. Revision stapedectomy. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(9):954-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199309000-00002
- Вишняков В.В., Свистушкин В.М., Синьков Э.В. Современные высокоэнергетические лазерные технологии при хирургическом лечении больных отосклерозом. Вестник Оториноларингологии. 2017;82(1):56-8 [Vishniakov VV, Svistushkin VM, Sinkov EV. The application of the modern high-energy laser technologies for the surgical treatment of the patients presenting with otosclerosis. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2017;82(1):56-8 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17116/otorino201782156-58
- Arnoldner C, Schwab B, Lenarz T. Clinical results after stapedotomy: a comparison between the erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser and the conventional technique. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:458-65. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000217355.96334.ba
- Свистушкин В.М., Синьков Э.В., Стожкова И.В. Этиопатогенетические аспекты отосклероза. Российская оториноларингология. 2021;20(5):68-74 [Svistushkin VM, Sinkov EV, Stozhkova IV. Etiopathogenetic aspects of otosclerosis. Rossiiskaia otorinolaringologiia. 2021;20(5):68-74 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.18692/1810-4800-2021-5-68-74
Supplementary files










