A clinical case of a patient with an anomaly in the development of the inner ear and refractory stimulation of the facial nerve after a coronavirus infection and meningitis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Thanks to the development of technology and new surgical approaches, it has become possible to perform cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with malformations of the inner ear. The experience of this type of rehabilitation has more than 15 years in Russian practice and more than 20 years in the world. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has added not only one more cause of deafness, but also etiological factor of the complications. The purpose of this paper is to describe a clinical case of facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in a CI user with an inner ear malformation and a coronavirus infection complicated by meningitis. A clinical case demonstrating a combination of all these etiological factors of FNS has not been previously described in the scientific literature.

Aim. To describe a clinical case of FNS in a CI user with an inner ear malformation and a coronavirus infection complicated by meningitis.

Materials and methods. In 2017 4 years old patient underwent cochlear implantation on her right ear in Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech. In May 2022 the patient was admitted to the infectious diseases department of the medical institution with the diagnosis: coronavirus infection (confirmed), severe course; complication: purulent meningoencephalitis. After recovery, the patient complained of facial muscles twitching when using the speech processor of the cochlear implant. In order to correct the non-hearing sensation, the patient was sent to the Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech for rehabilitation in June 2022. During repeated fitting, it was possible to improve the reactions to sounds. Phoneme discrimination has improved. Positive dynamics was registered against the background of the changed settings. The average hearing thresholds using 3-phase stimulation were 42.5 dB. However, it was not possible to completely eliminate the FNS, and the compulsory settings of the speech processor did not allow the patient to achieve sufficient speech intelligibility.

Conclusion. Meningitis after CI can cause an increase in the transmittance of the inner ear tissues to electric current and, as a consequence, the development of the FNS. Modern technologies make it possible to rehabilitate such patients, including those with abnormalities of the inner ear. To increase the effecacy of rehabilitation, special coding strategies are used including the 3-phase stimulation.

About the authors

Vladislav E. Kuzovkov

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Author for correspondence.
Email: v_kuzovkov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2581-4006

D. Sci. (Med.), Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Levin

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: megalor@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9770-7739

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Andrei S. Lilenko

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Email: aslilenko@gmail.com

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Serafima B. Sugarova

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Email: sima.sugarova@gmail.com

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Viktoriia A. Tanaschishina

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Email: tanasic95@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6345-020X

Graduate Student, Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Iulia S. Korneva

Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Email: korn_jul@mail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8616-8044

Clinical Resident, Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Кузовков В.Е., Янов Ю.К., Левин С.В. Аномалии развития внутреннего уха и кохлеарная имплантация. Российская оториноларингология. 2009;2:102-7 [Kuzovkov VE, Ianov IuK, Levin SV. Anomalii razvitiia vnutrennego ukha i kokhlearnaia implantatsiia. Rossiiskaia otorinolaringologiia. 2009;2:102-7 (in Russian)].
  2. Тунян Н.Т., Кузовков В.Е., Бычкова Е.В., и др. Диагностические, хирургические и анестезиологические аспекты кохлеарной имплантации. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2014;20(3):89-94 [Tunian NT, Kuzovkov VE, Bychkova EV, et al. Diagnosticheskie, khirurgicheskie i anesteziologicheskie aspekty kokhlearnoi implantatsii. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2014;20(3):89-94 (in Russian)].
  3. Berrettini S, Vito de A, Bruschini L, et al. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation: our experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31(1):11-6.
  4. Bigelow DC, Kay DJ, Rafter KO. Facial nerve stimulation from cochlear implants. Am J Otol. 1998;9:163-9.
  5. Weber BP, Lenarz T, Battmer D. Otosclerosis and facial nerve stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:445-7.
  6. Rah YC, Yoon YS, Chang MY, et al. Facial nerve stimulation in the narrow bony cochlear nerve canal after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(6):1433-9.
  7. Aljazeeri IA, Khurayzi T, Al-Amro M, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography parameters in patients with facial nerve stimulation post-cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(10):3789-94.
  8. Papsin BC. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(1 Pt. 2 Suppl. 106):1-26.
  9. Kempf HG, Johann K, Lenarz T. Complications in pediatric cochlear implant surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:128-32. doi: 10.1007/s004050050124
  10. Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1787-91.
  11. Ahn JH, Oh SH, Chung JW, Lee KS. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation according to types of Nucleus 24-channel electrode arrays. Acta Oto-laryngologica. 2009;129(6):588-91.
  12. Lima MA, Silva MTT, Soares CN, et al. Peripheral facial nerve palsy associated with COVID-19. J Neurovirol. 2020;26(6):941-4.
  13. Codeluppi L, Venturelli F, Rossi J, et al. Facial palsy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav. 2021;11(1):e01939.
  14. Egilmez OK, Gündoğan ME, Yılmaz MS, Güven M. Can COVID-19 Cause Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy? SN Compr Clin Med. 2021;3(8):1707-13.
  15. Fotuhi M, Mian A, Meysami S, Raji CA. Neurobiology of COVID-19. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(1):3-19.
  16. Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Brammeier TG, Prenger EC. Facial nerve stimulation after nucleus 22-channel cochlear implantation. Am J Otol. 1997;18:336-41.
  17. Кузовков В.Е., Лиленко А.С., Сугарова С.Б., и др. Факторы риска стимуляции лицевого нерва у пользователей кохлеарных имплантов: наш опыт. Российская оториноларингология. 2022;21(5):116-21 [Kuzovkov VE, Lilenko AS, Sugarova SB, et al. Faktory riska stimuliatsii litsevogo nerva u pol'zovatelei kokhlearnykh implantov: nash opyt. Rossiiskaia otorinolaringologiia. 2022;21(5):116-21 (in Russian)].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1

Download (83KB)
3. Fig. 2

Download (83KB)
4. Fig. 3

Download (217KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies