Digitalization of Social Services: Problems of Theory And Practice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the problems of theory and practice caused by the process of digitalization of services provided to citizens in the social sphere. One of the most pressing issues of digitalization is examined – the digital divide or digital inequality, which is spreading in relation to socially vulnerable groups of citizens, hindering their access to information technologies due to a variety of reasons (financial situation, health status, place of residence, lack of knowledge and skills for safe interaction in the digital environment, etc.). The legal problems of transferring social services to a digital format “by default” and its constant technological complication are analyzed. It is determined that the digital divide serves as a factor hindering the development of social services and the implementation of social guarantees in the context of digitalization and, accordingly, increases the need for effective state protection of the rights of citizens in need of social assistance. It has been established that the principle of social equality and accessibility of social services is possible provided that it is extended to all citizens, without exception, which makes it possible to define such a right similar to the right of access to justice, the implementation of which is not subject to restrictions, and those citizens who cannot independently receive a social service in digital format need the help of specialists by introducing the institution of a digital curator and maintaining the ability to receive services on paper.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Natalia Letova

Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: letovanv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7033-977X

Doctor of Science (Law), Chief Researcher at the Procedural Law Sector.

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Shaveko, N. A. The concept of the right to a dignified life in pre-revolutionary legal philosophy, particularly in relation to the justification of socio-economic rights. Siberian Legal Review. 2024;(2):156-168. (In Russ.)
  2. Kravets, I. A. Constitutionalization of human dignity and prospects for the right to social well-being. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2020;(1):41-53. (In Russ.)
  3. Kolotova, N. V. The influence of economic factor on the exercise of social rights. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2022;(6):79-88. (In Russ.)
  4. Letova, N. V., Borisova, L. V., Matskevich, I. M., et al. Violence as a negative social phenomenon: legal means of counteraction. Monograph. Ed. N. V. Letova. Moscow: Prospekt; 2023. 280 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Solovyanenko, N. I. Problems of implementation and protection of the rights of participants in economic relations in the conditions of the digital divide. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2023;(2):188-193. (In Russ.)
  6. Gabov, A. V. Changes in law as the consequence of digital economy development. Perm Legal Almanac. 2020;(3):39-47. (In Russ.)
  7. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L. Digital capital: a Bourdieusian perspective on the digital divide. London: Emerald Publishing Ltd; 2020. 122 р.
  8. Dijk, J. van. A theory of the digital divide. In: M. Ragnedda, G. W. Muschert, eds. The digital divide. The internet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: Routledge; 2013. Pp. 28–51.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).