Email this article 
Assessment of the Significance of Violations in Cases of Administrative Responsibility for Non-compliance of the Order of Control (Supervisory) Authorities in a Court of General Jurisdiction
- Authors: Selkhova O.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Tver Regional Court
- Issue: No 9 (2024)
- Pages: 49-56
- Section: Public law (state law) studies
- Submitted: 26.01.2026
- Published: 18.09.2024
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-909X/article/view/376285
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.9.49-56
- ID: 376285
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article is devoted to the discussion of approaches to addressing the issue of the admissibility of using evidence in administrative liability cases for non-compliance with the orders of control (supervisory) authorities in the courts of general jurisdiction, which have procedural irregularities.
Based on the analysis of theoretical provisions, current legislation regulating relations in the field of control (supervisory) proceedings, and judicial practice materials, the author substantiates the necessity of applying a differentiated approach to assessing the admissibility of evidence in this category of cases. Conclusions are drawn regarding the need for classifying law violations by an official of the control (supervisory) authority when receiving evidence as substantial and insubstantial, remediable and irremediable, and recommendations for improving legislation in this area have been formulated.
Full Text
About the authors
Olga E. Selkhova
Tver Regional Court
Author for correspondence.
Email: selkhova@gmail.com
Judge
Russian Federation, TverReferences
- Vladimirov, L. E. The doctrine of criminal evidence. Tula: Avtograf; 2000. 464 p. (In Russ.)
- Kolokolov, G. E. Course of criminal proceedings. Moscow; 1888. 156 p. (In Russ.)
- Spasovich, V. D. On the theory of judicial and criminal evidence in connection with the judicial system and judicial proceedings. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Governing Senate; 1861. 116 p. (In Russ.)
- Foynitsky, I. Ya. Course of criminal proceedings. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. 3rd ed., rev. and add. St. Petersburg: M. Stasyulevich Printing House; 1996. 607 p. (In Russ.)
- Arsenyev, V. D. Questions of the general theory of judicial evidence in the Soviet criminal process. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1964. 178 p. (In Russ.)
- Zhogin, N. V., ed. The theory of evidence in the Soviet criminal process. 2nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1973. 736 p. (In Russ.)
- Kipnis, N. M. The admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. Mosсow: Yurist’’; 1995. 128 p. (In Russ.)
- Savitsky, V. M. Before the jury: guilty or not guilty? Moscow: Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; 1995. 78 p. (In Russ.)
- Zolotykh, V. V. Verification of the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks; 1999. 288 p. (In Russ.)
- Motovilovker, Ya. O. Some aspects of the issue of the admissibility (inadmissibility) of sources of evidence in Soviet criminal proceedings. In: Ya. O. Motovilovker, ed. Proving in criminal cases. Interuniversity collection. Krasnoyarsk: Publishing House of the Krasnoyarsk University; 1986. Рp. 54–62. (In Russ.)
- Zazhitsky, V. I. Questions of evidentiary law. Sovetskaya yustitsiya = Soviet Justice. 1992;(19-20):3-4. (In Russ.)
- Orlov, Yu. K. Problems of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurist’’; 2009. 175 p. (In Russ.)
- Barygina, A. A. Proving in criminal proceedings: the admissibility of evidence. Textbook for universities. 2nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Yurajt; 2023. 204 p. (In Russ.)
- Zaitseva, S. A. Evaluation of evidence in the Russian criminal process. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Moscow; 2002. 177 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
