Criminal Procedural Relations: Current State and Prospects of Development

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The change in the structure and content of criminal procedural relations is due to the new guidelines of criminal proceedings. It is significant to determine the place of artificial intelligence among the subjects of criminal procedural relations. Legal certainty is not enough when answering the question about the actual criteria for their classification.


Purpose of the цork: to analyze new approaches to the typology of criminal procedural relations, to formulate their content more fully, as well as to identify the role of artificial intelligence in them.


Having studied certain elements of criminal procedural relations, one can come to the conclusion that their content is a complex of subjective rights and obligations that meets the modern needs of society and the state to a greater extent, having a dynamic character due to permanent rule-making. The science of criminal procedure and the legislator have not developed unified approaches to determining the legal capacity and capacity of the subjects involved in the disclosure, investigation of crimes and consideration of criminal cases on the merits. There is a need to eliminate legal gaps on this issue. There are prerequisites for the identification of a new type of criminal procedural relations using artificial intelligence.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anna A. Petrikina

North Caucasus Branch, Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: annapetrikina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3981-4154

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Krasnodar

References

  1. Akhmatov, I. I. The concept and signs of a criminal procedural legal relationship. Problemy prava = Issues of Law. 2013;(3):137-143. (In Russ.)
  2. Kurbanova, A. S. Criminal law relations and criminal liability: problems of correlation. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Chelyabinsk; 2010. 24 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Donika, D. A. A justice of the peace court as a regulator of criminal procedure relationships containing right abuse attributes. Mirovoj sud’ya = Justice of the Peace. 2021;(2):3-8. (In Russ.)
  4. Podshibyakin, A. N. Criminal law protection of criminal procedural relations: theoretical and applied analysis. Monograph. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State Regional University; 2010. 164 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Rybina, N. S. Criminal proceedings relationship: the concept, objectives, legal basis and structure. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2011;(7):204-208. (In Russ.)
  6. Vlasova, S. V. On the question of the correlation of criminal law and criminal procedure relations. In: V. G. Kostylev, ed. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: theory, problems of application. Materials of the All-Russian Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation (Perm, 28 February, 2019). Perm: Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service; 2019. Pp. 26–33. (In Russ.)
  7. Lupinskaya, P. A., Voskobitova, L. A., eds. Criminal procedural law of the Russian Federation. Textbook. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M; 2022. 1008 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Tomin, V. T., Zinchenko, I. A., eds. The criminal process of modern Russia. Problem lectures. Textbook for universities. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. General provisions of criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurajt; 2022. 366 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Bazhanov, S. V. The cost of criminal proceedings. Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Nizhny Novgorod; 2002. 585 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Zelenina, O. A. Correlation of categories of legal capacity and legal capacity in the procedural status of a participant in criminal proceedings. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pravo = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Law. 2011;(6):30-34. (In Russ.)
  11. Akhmatov, I. I. Concept and features of criminal procedure relationship. Problemy prava = Issues of Law. 2013;(3):137-143. (In Russ.)
  12. Teregulova, A. I., Yezhova, E. V. Criminal procedural capacity of juvenile suspects and accused. Juvenis Scientia. 2019;(3):34-36. (In Russ.)
  13. Zakirov, R. F. The use of modern it-technologies as a mean to achieve the basic tasks of legal proceedings. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure. 2018;(1):211-218. (In Russ.)
  14. Apostolova, N. N. Artificial intelligence in legal proceedings. Severo-Kavkazskij yuridicheskij vestnik = North Caucasian Legal Vestnik. 2019;(3):135-139. (In Russ.)
  15. Papysheva, E. S. Artificial intelligence as a threat to the principle of presumption of innocence. Advokatskaya praktika = Law Practice. 2022;(5):2-5. (In Russ.)
  16. Kolokolov, N. A. Once again on artificial intelligence in justice. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal Proceedings. 2020;(4):3-6. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).