Assessment by an Arbitration Court Amicable Agreement Between the Offender and the Administrative Jurisdiction Body

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the possibility of concluding amicable agreements between offenders and bodies of administrative jurisdiction. The possibility of concluding such agreements exists in arbitration courts. The basis is article 190 of the Arbitration Procedure Code. According to the author, this possibility is provided for in article 49 of the Arbitration Procedure Code.


The article analyzes the practice of concluding amicable agreements on specific cases. The author notes that there are few such agreements. There is often an opinion that the offender and the administrative jurisdiction body cannot agree, as this is contrary to the law. The author refutes this statement.


The article contains a list of issues that may be included in the agreement. This list is based on judicial practice and scientific research. This is a list of issues for reconciliation. These items can be used by any authority. Additionally, if the administrative body has violated the law and goes beyond its competence, the court must refuse to approve the settlement agreement.


According to the author, the institution of a settlement agreement should be more actively used in cases of bringing to administrative responsibility.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalia A. Morozova

Third Arbitration Court of Appeal

Author for correspondence.
Email: nastaly@narod.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0560-9259

Candidate of Science (Law), Judge, Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk

2

Law Institute of the Siberian Federal University

Email: email@example.com

Автор заявляет об отсутствии конфликта интересов

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk

References

  1. Rozhkova, M. A. Settlement agreement in the arbitration court. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii = Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2003;(9):101-113; 2003;(10):132-144. (In Russ.)
  2. Sherstyuk, V. M. New provisions of the third Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Economy and Law. 2001;(5):68-86. (In Russ.)
  3. Sherstyuk, V. M. Settlement agreement in the arbitration court: problems of theory and practice. Monograph. Moscow: Statut; 2004. 348 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Stepanova, O. A. Limits of dispositivity in cases of administrative offenses. Zakon = Law. 2014;(2):122-128. (In Russ.)
  5. Shchepalov, S. V. Discretionary techniques in judicial interpretation of administrative legislation. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice. 2018;(7):33-38. (In Russ.)
  6. Bakhrakh, D. N. Essays on the theory of Russian law. Moscow: Normа, Infra-M; 2010. 286 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Morozova, N. A. Administrative powers of the parties in disputes arising from public legal relations. Arbitrazhnaya praktika = Arbitration Practice. 2008;(9):53-60. (In Russ.)
  8. Rusinova, E. R., Tsyganova, E. M. Problems of concluding a settlement agreement when considering a public-law dispute in arbitration courts. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Сivil Procedure. 2007;(1):34-38. (In Russ.)
  9. Eliseikin, P. F. Judicial settlement agreement. Sovetskaya yustitsiya = Soviet Justice. 1968;(7):16-18. (In Russ.)
  10. Knyazev, D. V. Settlement agreement in the arbitration process. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Tomsk; 2004. 24 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Baryshnikov, P. S. Limits of the admissibility of concluding settlement agreements on economic disputes arising from public legal relations. Zakon = Law. 2018;(12):128-134. (In Russ.)
  12. Borodina, N. A. Settlement agreement on disputes arising from administrative and other public legal relations. Theory and practice of domestic law enforcement art. 190 of the Agroindustrial Complex of the Russian Federation and the experience of Germany. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2012;(5):39-43. (In Russ.)
  13. Alexandrov, N. G. On the question of the role of the contract in the legal regulation of public relations. Scientific notes of the All-Union Institute of Legal Sciences of the Ministry of Justice of the RSFSR. Issue 6. Moscow; 1947. Pp. 60–83. (In Russ.)
  14. Demin, A. V. General issues of the theory of the administrative contract. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University; 1998. 93 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Korenev, A. P., Abdurakhmanov, A. A. Administrative contracts: concepts and types. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 1998;(7):83-91. (In Russ.)
  16. Starilov, Yu. N. Administrative contract: experience of legislative regulation in Germany. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 1996;(12):40-52. (In Russ.)
  17. Klimkin, N. S. Administrative contract in the system of contractual relations of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya vysshykh uchebnykh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University Proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2014;(2):43-55. (In Russ.)
  18. Totyev, K. Yu. Judicial control over the content of a settlement agreement with the participation of an antimonopoly authority. Konkurentnoe pravo = Competition Law. 2015;(2):17-24. (In Russ.)
  19. Oreshin, E., Suspitsyna, I. Amicable agreements with the FAS of Russia: conclusion, content, judicial practice. Korporativnyj yurist = Corporate Lawyer. 2012;(6):36-40. (In Russ.)
  20. Nosenko, M. S., Samsonova, M. V. Amicable agreement in procedural science and judicial arbitration in practice. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2014;(7):24-32. (In Russ.)
  21. Yakovleva, I. A. Settlement agreement in an administrative dispute: problems of theory and trends in law enforcement practice. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;(1):54-61. (In Russ.)
  22. Totyev, K. Yu. The content of the settlement agreement with the participation of the antimonopoly authority. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2015;(2):93-98. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).