Evaluative Concepts of Inheritance Law Through the Prism of Harmonization of Private and Public Interests

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Problem statement. The article examines various evaluative concepts of inheritance law from the point of view of reflecting private and public interests in them. Research on this topic is very rare. The purpose of the work is to study the evaluative concepts of inheritance law for their compliance with the achievement of both private and public interests. Objectives of the article: 1) research of doctrinal views on private and public interests, as well as on the question of the private and public legal meaning of the right of inheritance; 2) analysis of specific evaluative concepts of inheritance law; 3) identification of the value of evaluative concepts of inheritance law in the harmonization of private and public interests.

Research methods: dialectical, analysis, synthesis, formal legal.

Conclusions. The combination of private and public interests manifests itself very vividly in such an evaluative concept as “a decent funeral”. Evaluative concepts related to burial also take place in foreign legal systems. In such an evaluative concept as “malicious evasion” of heirs by law from fulfilling the duties of the testator's maintenance that lay on them by virtue of the law, on the one hand, the private interests of the person filing a claim for recognition of the heir as unworthy are protected (as a rule, these are other heirs whose share in the inheritance mass increases when their claims are satisfied). On the other hand, they are public, since the presence of negative consequences in the law for the heir who maliciously evades the fulfillment of the duties of the testator’s maintenance encourages him to change his behavior and maintain a positive behavioral model in the public consciousness.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexander V. Fioshin

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: avfioshin@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4664-1976

Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Civil Law Department of the Russian State University of Justice, Professor of the Civil Law Disciplines Department of the Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Meyer, D. I. Russian civil law. 4th ed., rev. and enl. Moscow: Statut; 2021. 846 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Shershenevich, G. F. Favorites. Сomp. P. V. Krasheninnikov. Moscow: Statut; 2016. 496 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Pokrovsky, I. A. The main problems of civil law. 8th ed. Moscow: Statut; 2020. 351 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Fabrika, I. V. Some questions of the definition of the evaluative concept in modern legal science. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. 2012;(43):18-22. (In Russ.)
  5. Kudryavtsev, V. N. General theory of qualification of crimes. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1972. 301 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Tikhomirov, Yu. A. Public law. Textbook. Moscow: Beсk; 1995. 485 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Gorshunov, D. N. Interest in private law: questions of theory. Kazan: Kazan State University; 2005. 175 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Kaminskiy, E. S. On public interest in a criminal procedure. Rossijskij sud’ja = Russian Judge. 2021;(1):26-30. (In Russ.)
  9. Muromtsev, S. A. Definition and basic division of law. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University; 2004. 223 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Kurbatov, A. Ya. The combination of private and public interests in the legal regulation of entrepreneurial activity. Moscow: Tsentr YurInfoR; 2001. 211 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Sitdikova, R. I. Ensuring private, public and public interests by copyright. Ed. M. Yu. Chelyshev. Moscow: Statut; 2013. 159 p. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
  12. Fioshin, A. V. Evaluation categories in the norms on reimbursement of expenses caused by the death of the testator. Notarius = Notary. 2015;(3):41-45. (In Russ.)
  13. Kozlov, S. S. Commentary on Federal Law No. 8-FZ dated January 12, 1996 “On Burial and Funeral Business” (article by article). (In Russ.) Prepared for the “ConsultantPlus” system, 2006. (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
  14. Karkhalev, D. N. Legal regulation of relations for the protection of civil rights. Private law. Overcoming challenges. To the 60th anniversary of B. M. Gongalo. Moscow: Statut; 2016. Рp. 98–110. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
  15. Fioshin, A. V. Revisiting valuation notions of testamentary law. Notarius = Notary. 2016;(5):35-37. (In Russ.)
  16. Abramenkov, M. S., Chugunov, P. V. Freedom of will in Russian inheritance law. Nasledstvennoe parvo = Inheritance Law. 2010;(2):10-26. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
  17. Fioshin, A. V. Evaluative concepts of domestic testamentary law. Nasledstvennoe parvo = Inheritance Law. 2016;(1):23-26. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).