Violations committed by participants in criminal proceedings during jury trials revealed by courts of cassation of general jurisdiction

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article provides an overview of violations that serve as grounds for reversal of verdicts based on a jury verdict in courts of appeal, as well as the problems arising in judicial practice in identifying violations that are grounds for reversal of a verdict. The presented analysis of court practice is accompanied by examples which reflect the difficulties in the application by the courts of the relevant legal norms.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Igor’ V. Lebedev

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: ig170297@mail.ru

Postgraduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Alekseevskaya, E. N. Irremediable errors of the court with the participation of jurors. Evrazijskaya advokatura = Eurasian Advocacy. 2016;(5):32-35. (In Russ.)
  2. Pashin, S. A. Evidence in the Russian criminal process. In: Adversarial justice. Proceedings of scientific and practical laboratories. Issue 1. Pt. 2. Moscow: Publishing House of the International Committee for Legal Reform Assistance; 1996. Рp. 311–390. (In Russ.)
  3. Nasonov, S. A. Prohibition of research of evidence capable of causing prejudice of jurors against the defendant. Voprosy sovremennoj yurisprudencii = Questions of Modern Jurisprudence. 2014;(34):115-119. (In Russ.)
  4. Nasonov, S. A. “Shocking” evidence in a jury trial and the rule of unfair prejudice. In: B. N. Topornin, et al., eds. State and law at the turn of the century. Criminology. Criminal law. Judicial Law. Materials of the All-Russian Conference (February 2–4, 2000). Moscow: Publishing House of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2001. Pp. 266–272. (In Russ.)
  5. Khatuaeva, V. V., Avdeev, M. A. Features of the formation of a question sheet and a parting word of the presiding judge when considering a criminal case with the participation of jurors (practice of the Voronezh Regional Court). Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Leningrad Law Journal. 2016;(3):230-239. (In Russ.)
  6. Il’yukhov, A. A., Sarkisyan, A. Zh. Issues of law enforcement practice arising during the formation of the questionnaire, the resolution of problems of guilt and sentencing in courts with the participation of jurors. Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security. 2017;(4):172-175. (In Russ.)
  7. Zejdlits, E. G. Terminological features of the formulation of issues to be resolved by jurors. In: E. V. Pozdnyakova, ed. Collection of scientific tr. of the South-Western Legal forum dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the Faculty of Law of Southwestern State University. Issue 1. Kursk: South-Western State University; 2021. Рp. 173–177. (In Russ.)
  8. Turapina, A. A. Procedural problems of the formation of a question sheet during production in a jury trial. Voprosy rossijskoj yusticii = Issues of Russian Justice. 2020;(9):1135-1145. (In Russ.)
  9. Nasonov, S. A. Formulation of issues to be resolved by jurors: some problems of legislative regulation and judicial practice. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2014;(10):2297-2302. (In Russ.)
  10. Lupinskaya, P. A., Voskobitova, L. A., eds. Criminal Procedural Law of the Russian Federation. Textbook. 4th ed., repr. and add. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M; 2022. 1008 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).