Improper subjects of obtaining evidence

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine whether the evidence obtained by officials of the bodies of inquiry before the initiation of a criminal case and during the implementation of urgent investigative actions in criminal cases, for which preliminary investigation is mandatory, is admissible.

The methodological basis of the research is the universal dialectical method of scientific cognition, which made it possible to study the subject of research in relation to other legal phenomena, as well as general scientific methods of cognition (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) and private scientific methods of cognition.

Conclusions. Evidence obtained before the initiation of a criminal case in accordance with Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as in the order of urgent investigative actions in criminal cases in which the preliminary investigation is mandatory (art. 157 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation) by operatives, district police officers, other officials of the bodies of inquiry who are not interrogators who have accepted materials for their production, and do not have a written order to conduct a specific investigative action from the head of the body of inquiry, are inadmissible and cannot be used in criminal proceedings.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Viktor I. Kachalov

Russian State University of Justice

Author for correspondence.
Email: okukel@yandex.ru

Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Lebedev, V. M., ed. Criminal procedure law. Moscow: Infra-M; 2021. 935 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Golovko, L. V., ed. The course of the criminal process. Moscow: Statut; 2016. 1277 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Kachalov, V. I. Types of bodies of inquiry in modern criminal proceedings. Pravo v Vooruzhennyh silah – Voenno-pravovoe obozrenie = Law in the Armed Forces – Military-Legal Review. 2022;(5):76-87. (In Russ.)
  4. Ignatova, O. N. Delegation of procedural powers in criminal proceedings: concept, signs, methods. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Questions of Russian and International Law. 2019;(9):269-276. (In Russ.)
  5. Kachalova, O. V. When evidence is obtained by an improper subject. Ugolovnyj process = Criminal Process. 2022;(8):9. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).