Email this article 
Some Problem Aspects of Extending and Restoring Procedural Deads in Domestic Civil and Administrative Proceedings
- Authors: Utkin R.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
- Issue: No 10 (2025)
- Pages: 60-67
- Section: Public law (state law) studies
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-909X/article/view/361359
- ID: 361359
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
By setting deadlines for the performance of procedural actions, the legislator simultaneously provides for cases when procedural actions may be performed by participants in the proceedings and after the expiration of the prescribed period. This is served by mechanisms for extending and restoring procedural deadlines, the practice of which reveals a number of problems that need to be resolved. Using formal logical methods and the method of comparative jurisprudence, the article substantiates the thesis of insufficient regulation of the procedure for extending the procedural term in civil and administrative procedural legislation.
Author proposes to unify the provisions of the procedural codes in this part, also establishing the grounds for extending the term and the persons authorized to raise the issue in court. With regard to the procedure for restoring procedural deadlines, the vulnerability of the existing regulation to abuse of the right to judicial protection by persons delaying the entry into force of judicial acts adopted against them by late appeal of the latter is noted. The article substantiates the need to protect the interests of persons who have won a dispute in court, aimed at the early entry into force and enforcement of a court decision.
Full Text
About the authors
Roman V. Utkin
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Author for correspondence.
Email: r.utkin@narfu.ru
Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor at the Civil and Financial Department, Retired Judge.
Russian Federation, ArkhangelskReferences
- Karaskina, M. S. Appeal against the first instance court determination brought independently of the court decision in civil and administrative court proceedings. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(8):119-127. (In Russ.)
- Kostyan, I. A. Labor disputes: judicial procedure for the consideration of labor cases. 2nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: International Center for Financial and Economic Development; 2006. 320 p. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
- Manyak, N. I. Appeal of judicial acts in civil and arbitration proceedings. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics. 2011;(12):2047-2052. (In Russ.)
- Zhuikov, V. M. Problems of legal regulation of verification proceedings in civil proceedings. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2012;(11):22-26. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
- Shakiryanov, R. V. On the effectiveness of the amendments made to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation concerning appeal proceedings. A look at the appeal a year later. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge. 2013;(5):23-26. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
