Принцип пропорциональности как инструмент достижения баланса интересов в налоговых отношениях: проблемы теории и правоприменительной практики в России и за рубежом
- Авторы: Ядрихинский С.1
-
Учреждения:
- Кафедра административного и финансового права Северо-Западного института (филиала Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина)
- Выпуск: Том 14, № 3 (2021)
- Страницы: 82-105
- Раздел: Российское право: состояние, перспективы, комментарии
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-8166/article/view/318116
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2021.3.82.105
- ID: 318116
Цитировать
Полный текст
Аннотация
Об авторах
Сергей Ядрихинский
Кафедра административного и финансового права Северо-Западного института (филиала Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина)
Email: Syadr@yandex.ru
Доцент, кандидат юридических наук
Список литературы
- Barak А. (2010) Proportionality and Principled Balancing. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, no 1, pp. 1-18.
- Alexy R. (2009) (a) On Constitutional Rights to Protection. Legisprudence: International Journal for the Study of Legislation, no 1, pp. 1-17.
- Alexy R. (2009) (b) The Reasonableness of Law. In: Reasonableness and Law. G. Bongio-vanni et al (eds.). New York: Springer, 464 p.
- Alexy R. (2010) A Theory of Constitutional Rights. N.Y.: Oxford University press, 462 p.
- Alexy R. (2014) (a) Constitutional Rights, Democracy, and Representation. Ricerchegiuridiche, no 2, pp. 197-210.
- Alexy R. (2014) (b) Constitutional Rights and Proportionality. Revus, no 22, pp. 51-65.
- Alexy R. (2017) Proportionality and Rationality In: Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. V. Jackson and M. Tushnet (eds.). Cambridge: University Press, 343 p.
- Aristotle (2020) Nikomahovian ethics. Moscow-Berlin: Direct-Media, 222 p. (in Russian)
- Avila H. (2007) Theory of legal principles. Berlin: Springer, 154 p.
- Barak A. (1999) The Judicial Discretion. Moscow: Norma, 376 p. (in Russian)
- Barak A. (2005) Purposive interpretation in law. Princeton: University Press. 423 p.
- Barak A. (2012) Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitation. Cambridge: University press, 612 p.
- Bazhanov A.A. (2018) Implementing principle of proportionality in judicial practice. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law, no 6, pp. 124-157 (in Russian)
- Belov S.A. (2012) The axiological justification of decisions as a manifestation of judicial activism of the Russian Constitutional Court. Sravnitelnoe konstitutcionnoe obozrenie, no 2, pp. 140-150 (in Russian)
- Belov S.A. (2016) Rationality of judicial balancing of constitutional values with using proportionality test. Petersburgskiy jurist, no 1, pp. 63-75 (in Russian)
- Blokhin P.D. (2012) Secretariat of the Constitutional Court of Russia and consideration of citizens and their associations complaints: issue of competence. Zhurnal konstitutcionnogo pravosudia, no 1, pp. 14-22 (in Russian)
- Contreras P. (2012) National Discretion and International Deference in the Restriction of Human Rights: A Comparison Between Jurisprudence of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, issue 1, pp. 28-82.
- Daragan A.V. (2018) Application of proportionality test when considering constitutional complaints. In: Research trends — jurisprudence. Materials of International Conference. Saint Petersburg: MOAN, pp. 17-20 (in Russian)
- Dolzhikov A.V. (2015) A world of ideas and world of shadows: a historical-legal analysis of proportionality and the emergence of the phenomenon in a primitive society. Istoria gosudarstva i prava, no 15, pp. 14-19 (in Russian)
- Dolzhikov A.V. (2020) Constitutional principle of proportionality: interdisciplinary approach. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, no 47, pp. 6-27 (in Russian)
- Dworkin R. (1975) Hard Cases. Harvard Law Review, no 6, pp. 1057-1109.
- Gadzhiev G.A. (2019) On the principle of proportionality and constitutional cassation. Sudia, no 7, pp. 56-64 (in Russian)
- Gartman N. (2002) The ethics. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dahl University, 707 p. (in Russian)
- Grimm D. (2007) Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence. University of Toronto Law Journal, no 2, pp. 383-397.
- Harbo T. (2015) The Function of Proportionality Analysis in the European Law. Leiden — Boston: Brill — Nijhoff, 331 p.
- Klatt M. (2011) Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 71, pp. 691-718.
- Korkunov N.M. (2010) General theory of law. Moscow: Rosspen, 520 p. (in Russian)
- Kosla M. (2011) Proportionality: encroachment on human rights? Answer toTsakirakis. Sravnitelnoe konstitutionnoe obozrenie, no 5, pp. 58-66 (in Russian)
- Lapaeva V.V. (2013) Criteria for restricting human and civil rights in the Russian Federation Constitution. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no 2, pp. 14-24 (in Russian)
- Lazarev V.V. (2018) Restriction of law by court decision. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no 6, pp. 5-16 (in Russian)
- Leonov A.V. (2016) The concept, essence and genesis of the principle of proportionality in law. Yuridicheskaya mysl, no 4, pp. 18-23 (in Russian)
- Lopatnikova E.A., Kucherov I. I. (eds.) (2012) Implementation of the principles of tax law. Moscow: Jurisprudence, 160 p. (in Russian)
- Manzhosov S. (2019) Following precedent in the conditions of balancing. Sravnitelnoe konstitutcionnoe obozrenie, no 6, pp. 61-85 (in Russian)
- Matskevich I.M. (2019) Intellektologiyaprava. Preliminary results of mathematical modeling of the law. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, no 1, pp. 4-15 (in Russian)
- Mikhailov A.A. (2016) The principle of proportionality: the essence, practice of application by the ECHR, the Constitutional Court of Russia and the significance for improving the system of evidence in the modern criminal process of Russia. Ugolovnaya justitcia, no 1, pp. 56-69 (in Russian)
- Morozova L.A. (1998) Principles, limits, grounds for restricting human rights and freedoms under Russian legislation and international law: materials of the round table. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no 7, pp. 20-42 (in Russian)
- Perju V. (2017) Proportionality and Stare Decisis: Proposal for a New Structure. In: Forthcoming Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge: University Press, 343 p.
- Petersen N. (2017) Proportionality and judicial activism: fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa. Cambridge: University Press, 258 p.
- Sasov K.A. (2013) Tax justice in decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Norma, 256 p. (in Russian)
- Shlink B. (2012) Proportionality to the problem of the balance of fundamental rights and public goals. Sravnitelnoe konstitutionnoe obozrenie, no 2, pp. 56-76 (in Russian)
- Shustrov D.G. (2013) The hierarchy of constitutional values. Konstitutcionnoe i municipalnoe pravo, no 6, pp. 6-15 (in Russian)
- Sullivan E., Frase R. (2009) Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions. Oxford: OUP, 284 p.
- Sultanov A.R. (2007) On taxation of income received from the sale of shares. Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika, no 7, pp. 34-38 (in Russian)
- Timoshina E.V., Belyaev M.A. (eds.) (2016) Legal regulation in a situation of competition of human rights: the concept of “embroidery” of R. Alexy. In: Legal regulation: efficiency, legitimacy, justice: proceedings of the International Conference. Voronezh: UNIPRESS, 624 p. (in Russian)
- Timoshina E.V., Krayevsky A.A., Salmin D.N. (2015) Methodology of judicial interpretation: weighing tools in the situation of human rights competition. Vestnik Petersburgskogo universiteta, no 3, pp. 4-34 (in Russian)
- Troitskaya A. (2015) Limits of rights and absolute rights: beyond the principle of proportionality? Theory and practice of the Constitutional Court. Sravnitelnoe konstitutcionnoe obozrenie, no 2, pp. 45-69 (in Russian)
- Tsakirakis S. (a) (2011) Proportionality: encroachment on human rights? Sravnitelnoe konstitutcionnoe obozrenie, no 2, pp. 47-66 (in Russian)
- Tsakirakis S. (b) (2011) Proportionality: encroachment on human rights? Response to the article by Madhav Kosla. Sravnitelnoe konstitutcionnoe obozrenie, no 5, pp. 67-70 (in Russian)
- Urbina F. (2017) A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing. Cambridge: University press, 267 p.
- Wintr J. (2016) Alexy hovážící formuli. Pravnik, no 5, pp. 446-461.
Дополнительные файлы
