International Custom in the Russian Legal System
- Authors: Romashev Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Issue: Vol 15, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 195-221
- Section: Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-8166/article/view/318192
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2022.3.195.221
- ID: 318192
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
International custom, as we know, is one of the main sources of international law. At the same time, it is not directly indicated in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The mention of international custom is quite rare in other Russian regulatory legal acts. As a rule, the general phrase “generally recognized principles and norms of international law” is used. Its association with international customs causes controversy both in the doctrine of international law and among law enforcers. Based on the dialectical approach, as well as the use of general academic research methods, the article assesses the correlation between international customs legally binding on the Russian Federation and the provisions of the Constitution, laws and by-laws of the Russian Federation. The place of international customs in the Russian legal system is specified. It is emphasized that the formed international custom, recognized by the Russian Federation or its predecessors, is an international obligation of our state, regardless of its possible contradiction with certain provisions of Russian legislation. It is indicated that with the help of a law or a subordinate regulatory legal act of the Russian Federation, it is impossible to revoke the recognition of an international custom. It is shown that the Constitution of the Russian Federation is based on imperative universally recognized principles and norms of international law that exist in the form of international custom. Ways out of the situation when there is a contradiction between the international custom previously recognized by our country and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the use of the rebus sic stantibus clause in some cases are proposed. It is explained the failure of the formulation of the first provision of Part 4 of Article 15 of the Constitution. It is proposed to use an approach in its interpretation, according to which “International customs recognized by the Russian Federation, or containing peremptory norms of general international law, international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. In law enforcement practice, it is also proposed to take into account the approach — “If an international custom recognized by the Russian Federation, or containing mandatory norms of general international law, provides for rules other than the law, then the rules of international custom are applied.” It is proposed to take into account in the practice of law enforcement the mechanism of succession in relation to international customs, based on the general principles of law inherent in international law. The significance in the Russian legal system of particular (local) international customs, the norms of which are recognized by the Russian Federation, is shown.
About the authors
Yuri Romashev
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: noreply@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9059-584X
Doctor of Science (Law), Professor
References
- Alekseev S.S. (1981) Course of general theory of law. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 360 p. (in Russ.)
- Anufrieva L.P. (2019) Enigma of the Russian Constitution of 1993: «universally recognized principles and norms of international law». Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki=Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4-25 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.3.4.25
- Barnashev A.M. (2007) On the application by the Constitutional Court of Russia of generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation. In: Russian Yearbook of International Law. Saint Petersburg: Rossiya-Neva, pp. 42-50 (in Russ.)
- Chernichenko S.V. (1999) The theory of international law. Old and new theoretical issues. Moscow: NIMP, 531 p. (in Russ.)
- Chernichenko S.V. (2016) Thesis on the supremacy of international law and the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In: Russian Yearbook of International Law. Saint Petersburg: Rossiya-Neva, pp. 20-35 (in Russ.)
- Chernichenko S.V. (2014) The contours of international law. General issues. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga, 592 p. (in Russ.)
- Galindo G. (2021) Particular customary international law and the International Law Commission: Mapping presences and absences. Questions of International Law, no. 86, pp. 3-21.
- Gavrilov V.V. (2005) The concept and interaction of international and national legal systems. Vladivostok: University, 216 p. (in Russ.)
- Getman-Pavlova I.V., Postnikova E.V. (2019) International Law. Moscow: Yurait, 560 p. (in Russ.)
- Ginzburgs J. (1994) Correlation between international and domestic law in the USSR and in Russia. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo=Soviet State and Law, no. 3, pp. 111-112 (in Russ.)
- Glotova S.V. (2018) Generally recognized principles and norms of international law, their relationship with other categories and issues of application in the legal system of Russia. Voprocy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava=Matters of Russian and International Law, no. 12, pp. 170-182 (in Russ.)
- Kremnev P.P. (2021) Generally recognized principles and norms of jus cogens and obligations erga omnes: legal nature and hierarchy in the Russian legal system. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta=Herald of Saint Petersburg University, no. 3, pp. 783-802 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.318
- Kremnev P.P. (2006) Succession of states in non-codified areas. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava=Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 4, pp. 37-53.
- Kuznetsova O.A. (2009) Generally recognized principles and norms of international law in civil law: from a list to a system. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki=Herald of Perm University. Law, no. 2, pp. 111-118 (in Russ.)
- Lukashuk I.I. (2004) The Constitution of Russia and international law. In: Generally recognized principles and norms of international law, international treaties in practice of constitutional justice: papers of conference. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya, pp. 43-47 (in Russ.)
- Lukashuk I.I. (1993) International law in the courts of states. Saint Petersburg: Rossiya-Neva, 301 p. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004632547_023
- Lukashuk I.I. (1997) Norms of international law. Moscow: Spark, 322 p. (in Russ.)
- Manov G.N. (1995) Theory of state and law. Moscow: Bek, p. 678 (in Russ.)
- Menzhinsky V.I., Danilenko G.M. (1981) The process of formation and operation of customary international law. In: International Law and International Justice. N.A. Ushakov (ed.). Moscow: Norma, pp. 53-66 (in Russ.)
- O'Connell D. (1957) Succession of States. Moscow: Inostr. lit., 590 p. (in Russ.)
- Shestakov L.N. (1981) Imperative norms in the system of international law. Moscow: University, 120 p. (in Russ.)
- Timoshkov S.G. (2015) Application of international custom as a source of responsibility for the crime of aggression. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 12, pp. 149-156 (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/16647
- Tolstik V.A. (2000) Generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the legal system of Russia. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 8, pp. 67-77 (in Russ.)
- Tunkin G.I. (2000) Theory of international law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 398 p. (in Russ.)
- Vincy F. and Parisi F. (2009) Stability and Change in International Customary Law. Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 279-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/656058
- Zimnenko B.L. (2006) International law and legal system of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Statut, 454 p. (in Russ.)
Supplementary files
