Contractual Relations with Participation of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations
- 作者: Buzova N.1
-
隶属关系:
- Russian State University of Justice
- 期: 卷 14, 编号 5 (2021)
- 页面: 192-214
- 栏目: Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-8166/article/view/318142
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2021.5.192.214
- ID: 318142
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
In the creative industry, private interests cannot be satisfied only through their own actions and the realization of their own creative abilities. Coordinated interaction between representatives of creative professions and show business is needed. Various types of contracts are concluded, which do not always relate to the exercise of intellectual rights. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulates in more detail contractual relations related to the use of copyrighted works, not paying due attention to agreements with performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations, which leads to a different interpretation of the legislation in the process of enforcement. Performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations conclude not only contracts on the disposal of exclusive rights, including assignment agreements and licences, contracts on the distribution of remuneration for use, on the management of rights, including entrusted management agreements and others are possible. The article discusses some types of civil law contracts related to objects of related rights. The author analyzes some contractual relations related to neighboring rights, both named in chapter 71 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and not named in it, but occurring in practice. A comparison is made of similar contractual relationships relating to copyright and neighboring rights. It is important to distinguish contracts in the field of services with participation of performers, producers of phonograms, broadcasting organizations from contracts on the exercise of intellectual rights. If in the contracts of the first group special attention deserves the useful effect achieved by the actions of the service provider, then in the second group of contracts, the identity of the copyright holder as a party to the contract and the special characteristics of the result of intellectual activity are of great importance in the performance of the contract. The user (service recipient) must determine what is of paramount importance to him, since the essence of the contract with the performer, phonogram producer and broadcaster, its subject and content will depend on it.
作者简介
Natalia Buzova
Russian State University of Justice
Email: noreply@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2268-0345
Candidate of Science (Law), Leading Researcher
参考
- Anikin A.S. (2008) The content and exercise of exclusive rights. Candidate of Juridical Sciences Thesis. Moscow, 239 p. (In Russ.).
- Anikin A.S. (2018) Legal risks associated with the using design of a trust agreement for commercialization of intellectual property. In: Issues of increasing the efficiency of judicial protection of rights to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. Moscow: RGUP, pp. 121-126. (In Russ.).
- Aplin T., Davis J. (2017) Intellectual property law. Oxford: University Press. 932 p.
- Benevolenskaya Z.E. (2005) Trust management of property in business. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 282 p. (In Russ.).
- Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. (2011) Contract law. General provisions. Moscow: Statut, 847 p. (In Russ.).
- Gavrilov E.P. (2005) Commentary on the law on copyright and related rights. Moscow: Ekzamen, 384 p. (In Russ.).
- Goloschapov A.M. (2009) Issues of remuneration payment for the work for hire. Imushhestvenny'e otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii = Property Relations in Russia, no. 11, pp. 35-37. (In Russ.).
- Kalyatin V.O. (a) (2018) Intellectual Property Law. Legal regulation of databases. Moscow: Yurayt, 168 p. (In Russ.).
- Kalyatin V.O. (b) (2018) Development of a system for regulating the disposal of intellectual property rights in Russia. Imushhestvenny'e otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii = Property Relations in Russia, no. 2, pp. 54-63. (In Russ.).
- Karelina M.M. et al. (2019) Intellectual property: issues of judicial protection. Moscow: RGUP, 296 p. (In Russ.).
- Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.) (2014) Civil Code of the Russian Federation: Copyright. An article-by-article commentary. Moscow: Statut, 510 p. (In Russ.).
- Minbaleev A.V., Raxmatullina R.S., Sannikova L.V. et al. (2018) Agreements for the circulation of exclusive rights. Moscow: RAN, 184 p. (In Russ.).
- Morgunova E.A. (2008) Legal regulation of contracts in the field of copyright. Moscow: Patent, 112 p. (In Russ.).
- Morgunova E.A., Frolova N.M. (2021) Exclusive right in civil commerce. Moscow: Norma, 496 p. (In Russ.).
- Pavlova E.A. (ed.) (2018) Comments on part 4 of the Russian Civil Code (itemized). Moscow: Norma, 928 p. (In Russ.).
- Suhanov E.A. (ed.) (2000) Civil law. Vol. 2. Moscow: Bek, 544 p. (In Russ.).
- Valdez-Martinez E.R. (2012) Legal characteristics of the agreement on the payment of remuneration for the use of phonograms. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, no. 2, pp. 107-115. (In Russ.).
- Vitryanskiy V.V. (2016) Reforming Russian civil legislation: interim results. Moscow: Statut, 431 p. (In Russ.).
补充文件
