Email this article Features of Judicial Control when Selecting a Measure of Prevention in the Form of House Arrest
- Authors: Mamedov R.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban State University
- Issue: Vol 17, No 8 (2024)
- Pages: 117-120
- Section: Criminal Law Sciences
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-3164/article/view/286363
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IVQGHU
- ID: 286363
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article analyzes current issues and problems of implementing judicial control when choosing a preventive measure in the form of house arrest. Particular attention is paid to the judicial practice that has developed in the application of this type of judicial control. The advantages of house arrest over other preventive measures are noted. In addition, the author puts forward proposals for improving the institution of house arrest.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ramil Ya. Mamedov
Kuban State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ramilmamedov90@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 9602-3454
Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof. of Criminal Procedure
Russian Federation, KrasnodarReferences
- Germevsky Yu. R. Judicial jurisdiction in the sphere of application of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Russian Justice. 2021. No. 1 (In Rus).
- Larkina E.V. A new preventive measure—a ban on certain actions. Criminal Law. 2018. No. 4 (In Rus.).
- Nazyrova N. A. Problems of alternative measures of restraint in the form of detention. Alley of Science. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 4 (20). Pp. 715–718.(In Rus.).
- Advocacy in Russia: textbook for universities. [ Sergeev V.I. et al.]; V.I. Sergeeva (gen. ed.).; Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute—Ed. 4th, revised. and add. Moscow: Justicinform, 2011. 1006, [1] s.; ISBN 978-5-7205-1086-2.
Supplementary files
