Comment on the Paradoxes of Scientific, Practical and Official Interpretations and Definitions of Legal Norms Using the Example of the Criminal Code of the Azerbaijan Republic
- Authors: Mustafayev M.1,2, Shahbanova A.1,3, Aliyev E.2
-
Affiliations:
- Baku State University
- Center for Forensic Expertise under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan
- Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan
- Issue: Vol 17, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 139-151
- Section: Criminal Law Sciences
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-3164/article/view/260098
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2024-17-3-139-151
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KULTXD
- ID: 260098
Cite item
Abstract
This article is devoted to one of the most important issues of legal science - the interpretation of legal norms. Based on the study of doctrinal and official interpretation materials, problematic issues of a theoretical and practical nature are revealed, which negatively affect the quality of the results of the considering scientific and practical activity.
According to the authors of this article, the main reasons for the pressing problems of interpretation of legal norms lie in the destructive nature of the modern methodology of legal science, which we inherited as the “legacy” of the Soviet legal school. As a result of the research, reasoned proposals were formulated to enrich and deepen the fundamental foundations of the methodology of legal science.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Mubariz Mustafayev
Baku State University; Center for Forensic Expertise under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Author for correspondence.
Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6220-3493
Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor of the Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Science
Azerbaijan, Baku; BakuAygun Shahbanova
Baku State University; Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1482-621X
SPIN-code: 3894-5433
Dr.Philos.(Law), Junior Counselor of Justice, freelance teacher, Chief Consultant of the General Department of Legislation
Azerbaijan, Baku; BakuElvin Aliyev
Center for Forensic Expertise under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az
doctoral student
Azerbaijan, BakuReferences
- Alekseev S.S. The line of law. M., 2006.p. 50.
- Theory of State and Law. Edited by N.I. Matuzova and A.V. Malko. M.: Norma-Infra, 2015, 639 p.
- Mustafaev M.Kh. Poverty of methodology in modern political and legal research. Baku, Qanun, 2005, No. 1.
- Marchenko M.N., Deryabina E.M. Theory of state and law of Russia. Vol.2. M.: Prospekt Publishing House, 2021, 448 p.
- Tikhonravov V.N. Philosophy of law. M., 1998, p. 53
- Syrykh V.M. History and methodology of legal science. M.: Infra-M., 2013, 464 p.
- Kerimov D.A. Philosophy of Law, M. 2013.
- Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Philosophy. Moscow, 2021, p.440-444.
- Berdyaev N.A. Free spirit philosophy. M.: AST, 2011, 693 p.
- Kirillov V.I., Starchenko A.A. Logics. M., 1998., p. 14.
- Criminal law. A common part. Ed. B.V. Zdravomyslova. M.: Lawyer, 1996, 512 p.
- Grishaev M.I., Krieger G.A. Complicity in criminal law. M. 1959, p. 140.
- https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/organizatsiya-prestupnogo-soobschestva-prestupnoy-organizatsii-st-210-uk-rf-problemy-primeneniya-i-otvetstvennosti/viewer
- Zhalinsky A.E. Modern German criminal law. M.: Prospekt Publishing House, 2006, 506 p.
- Criminal law of Russia. Parts General and Special: textbook / Ed. A.V. Brilliantova - 2nd ed., revised. and additional – Moscow: Prospekt, 2018, 1184 p.
- Razzeev D.N. Kant's teleological ontology. SPb. Science, 2010, p.66.
- Mustafaev M.Kh. Adversarial form and objective truth // Black holes in Russian legislation. M. 2007, No. 1, pp. 187-193.