Creation of a Unified Integrated System of Forensic Activities in the Russian Federation: Statement of the Problem and Ways to Solve It

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article discusses the problems associated with the integration of non-governmental forensic expert organizations into a single system of forensic expert activity.

The purpose of the study is to develop specific proposals aimed at the implementation of the task.

As a result of the study, conclusions were formulated about the importance of the non-governmental sector in the production of forensic examinations, about the expediency of restoring freelance expert positions in state forensic institutions.

About the authors

Vadim A. Epshtein

Municipal institution of forensic expertise; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: epshtayn@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 7165-5972
Scopus Author ID: 1135314

postgraduate student, Director of development

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Moscow

References

  1. Aminev F.G. Forensic activities in the Russian Federation: modern problems and ways to solve them. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law. Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Educational Institution "Bashkir State University". Ufa. 2016. P. 291.
  2. Kalutskikh N.V., N.A. Petrishche, V.A. Epshtein Issues of extending the effect of the Federal Law of May 31, 2001 No. 73-FZ “On State Forensic Expert Activities in the Russian Federation” to the forensic activities of persons who are not state forensic experts. In the collection: “Theory and practice of forensic examination in modern conditions”; materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference. – Moscow: RG-Press, 2019. – 704 p. pp. 377-379.
  3. Omelyanyuk G.G. Legal regulation of forensic examination by non-state forensic experts // Forensic examination. 2004. No. 1. P. 45-48.
  4. Rossinskaya E.R. Non-state forensic activity: current state, problems of improvement and development // The future of Russian law: concepts and social practices V Moscow Legal Forum. XIV International Practical Conference (Kutafin Readings): conference materials: in 4 parts. Ed. V.N. Sinyukova. Part 4. pp. 367-372.
  5. Smirnova S.A., Kokin A.V. The concept of an interdepartmental center for additional professional education of forensic experts // Theory and practice of forensic examination. 2020. Volume 15. No. 2. P. 8-14.
  6. Epstein V.A. Issues of regulation of the activities of non-state expert organizations in civil and arbitration processes. “Theory and practice of forensic examination in modern conditions”; materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference. – Moscow: RG-Press, 2019. – 704 p. P.587-590.
  7. Epshtein V.A., Kalutskikh N.V. Harmonization and unification of scientific and methodological support for the production of forensic examinations in state and non-state forensic institutions. Materials of the scientific and practical conference with international participation “Fundamental and applied research in the field of forensic activities and DNA registration of the population of the Russian Federation.” Bash State University, 2019, pp. 311-316.
  8. Epstein V.A. Issues of integration of non-state expert institutions into a unified system of forensic expert activities. In the collection: Innovations in forensic activities in the system of forensic institutions of the Ministry of Justice of Russia. Materials of the All-Russian Conference. Comp. E.V. Chesnokova. Moscow, 2022. pp. 189-193.
  9. Yurchenko L.V. On the need to create a Federal Service for Forensic Expertise // The Future of Russian Law: Concepts and Social Practices V Moscow Legal Forum. XIV International Practical Conference (Kutafin Readings): conference materials: in 4 parts. Ed. V.N. Sinyukova. Part 4. P.425-429.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies