Concept and Classification of Evidence Presented During Interrogation

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The purpose of this article is the theoretical study of the concept and classification of evidence presented during interrogation by considering the opinions of the scientific community and authoritative legal figures.

The author elaborated on the concepts of admissibility, relevance, credibility and sufficiency of evidence, as well as various classifications of this category in the study. The author also raised questions about the source of evidence and their types.

Conclusions: in order to serve the purposes of justice evidence must have a number of qualities, namely, it must be sufficient and admissible, credible and relevant according to Article 88 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Data carriers forming primary information are people and objects, but there is a divergence of views in the scientific community as to what they are sources or carriers of evidence.

The admissibility of evidence is the result of compliance with all the requirements of the law regarding its source, method of obtaining, subject of proof, verification of evidence, rules for the admission of documents to the case.

The relativity of evidence or their belonging to a particular criminal case is based on a spatial, temporal and causal relationship.

The reliability or certainty of the origin of information is one of the criteria for compliance with criminal procedure norms and requirements.

Sufficiency is a property of evidence that constitutes exhaustive information to confirm this or that information.

The classification of evidence allows to distinguish between different bases and functions, for example, initial and derivative, exculpatory and accusatory, personal and material.

作者简介

Murat Boziev

Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: dok132828@gmail.com

police major, Lecturer, North Caucasian Institute for Advancement qualifications of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (branch), Department of Special Disciplines

俄罗斯联邦, Nalchik, KBR

参考

  1. Constitution of the Russian Federation: text as amended during the all-Russian vote on July 1, 2020: [adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993]. – Text: electronic // ConsultantPlus [website].
  2. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation) dated December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (last edition) - Text: electronic // ConsultantPlus [website].
  3. Barabash A.S. The nature of the Russian criminal process, the goals of criminal procedure and their establishment. - St. Petersburg: R. Aslanov Publishing House "Legal Center Press", 2005. - P. 138.
  4. Bryanskaya E.V. On material evidence in criminal proceedings // Siberian Legal Bulletin. 2013. - No. 2. - P. 86-91.
  5. Davletov A.A. Fundamentals of criminal procedure knowledge. Sverdlovsk: Publishing House Ural. un-ta, 1991. - P. 100.
  6. Dinaev R.R. Presentation of evidence as one of the main tactics of interrogation of the accused, who denies his involvement in a robbery or robbery against a minor // Bulletin of the SevKavGTI. - 2011. - Issue. 11. - P. 94-97.
  7. Dorokhov V.Ya. The concept of the source of evidence // Actual problems of proof in the Soviet criminal process. Abstracts of speeches at a theoretical seminar held by the All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR on March 27, 1981 - M .: Publishing House of the All-Union Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 1981. - P. 7-12
  8. Mezinov D.A. On the issue of dividing evidence into direct and indirect // Actual problems of Russian law. 2016. - No. 2 (63). - P. 146-152.
  9. Mikhailovskaya I.B. Types of evidence // Criminal process. Textbook / Edited by I. L. Petrukhin. M., 2001. - P.183 -192.
  10. Motorin A.S. Presentation of evidence during interrogation in a conflict-free situation // Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. - 2008. - No. 3 (3). - P. 104-107.
  11. Orlov Yu. K. Fundamentals of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Scientific and practical guide. M., 2000. P.110-111.;
  12. Orlov Yu.K. Problems of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. M., 2009. - P. 145.
  13. Rogava I.G., Yalovaya D.V., Admissibility as a property of evidence in criminal proceedings // International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. - 2019. - No. 2-2. – P. 173-175.
  14. Ryabchikov V.V., Kornienko D.O. Problems of admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings // StudNet. 2021. - No. 7. - P. 343-348.
  15. Serednev V.A. Problems of the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings // MNKO. 2012. - No. 3. - P. 324-331.
##common.cookie##