Controversial Issues of Responsibility for Crimes that Infringe on the Freedom to Determine the Place of Their Stay, According to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The purpose of the study is to improve the institution of criminal responsibility for crimes that infringe on the freedom to determine the place of their stay, as well as to develop and make proposals to improve the relevant law enforcement activities. In particular, these are the acts provided for in Article 126 "Kidnapping", Article 127 "Illegal deprivation of liberty", Article 206 "Hostage-taking" and Article 301 "Illegal detention, detention or detention" of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The listed crimes are in different chapters of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, however, they have an undoubted similarity with each other, since they all encroach on the realization of the right to freedom and personal inviolability provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. During the study of the issue, in particular, controversial points were identified related to the distinction between kidnapping and hostage-taking, theft and abduction, the commission of acts for selfish motives and for hire. Author's proposals for improving legislation and law enforcement practice are substantiated and made. The conducted research gives grounds to conclude that the constitutions of various crimes provided for by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, encroaching on the freedom to determine the place of their stay, were originally constructed independently of each other (a certain exception is partly only kidnapping and illegal deprivation of liberty), which caused a significant number of questions about the differentiation of the corresponding crimes among themselves in law enforcement activities. In relation to the group of crimes under consideration, the recognition of the main criterion for distinguishing hostage-taking from related crimes is the presence of a requirement for other persons (not a hostage), the fulfillment of which is a condition for the release of the hostage.

Sobre autores

Igor Bikeev

Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: bikeev@ieml.ru

Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure

Rússia, Kazan

Andrey Klemin

Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov

Email: klemin@ieml.ru

Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of International and European Law

Rússia, Kazan

Sergey Zharov

Chelyabinsk State University

Email: serzhar@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law

Rússia, Chelyabinsk

Bibliografia

  1. Arkhipkin I.V. Problems of improving the norm establishing responsibility for kidnapping / I.V. Arkhipkin, S.V. Kornakova. — doi: 10.17150/2500- 4255.2022.16 (3).365-373. — EDN CUWXEG // All—Russian Criminological Journal. — 2022. — Vol. 16, No. 3. - pp. 365-373.
  2. Arkhipkin I.V., Kornakova S.V. Evolution of norms regulating responsibility for kidnapping // Eurasian Legal Journal. 2022. No. 9. pp. 291-293.
  3. Bersh T.A. Problems of applying a special ground for exemption from criminal liability for kidnapping / T.A. Bersh, A.A. Hristyuk. — doi: 10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4) .27 // Baikal Scientific Journal. — 2021. — Vol. 12, No. 4.
  4. Brilliantov A.V. Kidnapping: qualification issues // Russian justice. 2020. No. 9. pp. 77-83.
  5. Volkov K.A. Kidnapping and a new explanation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation // Russian Judge. 2020. No. 8. pp. 54-58.
  6. Govorov I.G. Kidnapping and hostage-taking: the problem of differentiation // Criminal law. 2019. No. 4. pp. 28-35.
  7. Espergenova E.V. On the need for legislative consolidation of the concepts of "kidnapping" and "illegal deprivation of liberty" // Bulletin of the Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after Barimbek Beisenov . 2016. No. 1. pp. 44-47.
  8. Zhivodrova N.A. Criminal responsibility for kidnapping under the legislation of the CIS countries // Epomen. 2020. No. 49. pp. 134-145.
  9. Zhirov R.M. Kidnapping: problems of modernization of criminal law norms // Law and Law. 2022. No. 3. pp. 164-167.
  10. Zelenin S.R., Borisov S.V. Kidnapping, illegal imprisonment and human trafficking: explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan // Criminal Process. 2020. No. 4. pp. 22-30.
  11. Ivanov A.L., Ermolovich Ya.N. Questions of the qualification of kidnapping. // Criminal Law. 2021. No. 1. pp. 29-35.
  12. Ivanov A.L., Ermolovich Ya.N. Controversial issues of qualification of kidnapping, illegal imprisonment and human trafficking // Investigation of crimes: problems and ways to solve them. 2021. No. 1. pp. 51-55.
  13. Kolotova Yu.A., Serdyukov A.V. A brief historical sketch of criminal responsibility for kidnapping // Modern school of Russia. Modernization issues. 2021. No. 2-1. pp. 198-199.
  14. Kolotova Yu.A., Serdyukov A.V. The object of the crime is kidnapping: historical aspect // A Russian investigator. 2022. No. 3. pp. 72-75.
  15. Krapiva I.I. The history of the development of criminal responsibility for kidnapping in Russian legislation at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries // Law and Law. 2021. No. 11. pp. 229-231.
  16. Martynenko N.E., Maydykov A.F. The influence of Ivan Yakovlevich Foynitsky's ideas on the formation of criminal responsibility for kidnapping in modern Russia // Questions of history. 2020. No. 12-3. pp. 230-234.
  17. Makhneva A.D. Illegal detention, detention or detention // Union of Criminologists and Criminologists. 2019. No. 4. pp. 136-144.
  18. Pertsev D.V., Chobanov G.A. Shortcomings of the criminal legal regulation of the detention of a person who committed a crime and responsibility for knowingly illegal detention // Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 2. pp. 22-25.
  19. Raash T. "Kidnapping for the purpose of extortion" (§ 239A UU FRG) and "hostage-taking" (§ 239B UU FRG) // Union of Criminologists and criminologists. 2020. No. 1. pp. 118-122.
  20. Roloff A. "Kidnapping of a person" (§ 234 UU) and "Hijacking of a person" (§ 234A UU) // Union of Criminologists and criminologists. 2020. No. 1. pp. 123-127.
  21. Skripchenko N.Y. Criminal liability for kidnapping, illegal imprisonment and human trafficking: legislative regulation and practice of application // Russian justice. 2020. No. 11. pp. 21-24.
  22. Urusbekova. В.D. Complex characteristics of persons who have committed kidnapping by force // News of universities of Kyrgyzstan. 2021. No. 2. pp. 168-171.

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies