Contract of Assignment of the Right of Claim: Features of Contesting in the Framework of the Bank's Insolvency Case

The article analyzes the legal grounds for invalidating the contract of assignment of the right of claim and the application of the consequences of the invalidity of the transaction in the case of recognition of an insolvent credit institution. The legal proceedings in these cases within the framework of a separate dispute, as a rule, consist in the individuality of each situation and a broad interpretation in terms of the qualification of the claimed claim. This article highlights certain postulates that are used by courts in law enforcement practice and considers separate isolated disputes on the invalidation of the assignment of rights of claims. As a result of the analysis of judicial practice, problems in law enforcement practice are formulated, conclusions are drawn about the need to make additions to regulatory documents, on the basis of which specific proposals are formulated.

insolvency of a credit institution, bank, assignment of the right of claim, invalid transaction, contesting the assignment agreement, imaginary transaction