Immediate Effects of the Self-Retaining Barbed Suture Material Application for Gastrojejunostomy During Mini Gastric Bypass Laparoscopic Surgery

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The safety of self-retaining barbed suture material application when closing wounds of hollow organs and forming anastomoses remains controversial. Data on the use of self-retaining barbed suture material at the stage of a single anastomosis formation during mini gastric bypass laparoscopic surgery (mini gastric bypass - MGB) in the treatment of morbid obesity is scarce and includes both examples of suturing a technological hole after the implementation of a hardware technique, and totally hand-sewn intracorporeal knotless formation of a gastrojejunostomy. 
The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate effects of single-row continuous sutures performed with self-retaining barbed unidirectional suture material for intracorporeal hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during MGB.
Methods. The study included 116 patients with grade II-III obesity who underwent MGB. The total duration of operations and the duration of the gastrojejunostomy stage, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the frequency and severity of intra- and postoperative complications were prospectively studied in accordance with the unified classifications of Satava-Kazaryan and Accordion, respectively. The first group consisted of 56 patients; a conventional synthetic (polydioxanone) monofilament suture material was used for hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy in patients of this group. The second group consisted of 60 patients; gastrojejunostomy was performed with single-needle unidirectional self-retaining barbed absorbable polyester monofilaments in patients of this group. The study groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), the nature of comorbid pathology and the frequency of previous operations. 
Results. The use of unidirectional self-retaining barbed suture material for a hand-sewn intracorporeal single-row gastrojejunostomy in MGB was accompanied by a significant reduction in the total duration of interventions due to a reduced gastrojejunostomy stage if compared with the use of conventional synthetic monofilaments. The median volume of blood loss during operations did not exceed 50 ml and had no significant differences between groups. Intraoperatively, in patients of the study groups there were registered only complications of the first degree of severity, according to the Satava-Kazaryan classification, with a frequency of 6.7-8.9% (p = 0.737). In the postoperative period, the development of minor complications (first severity of the Accordion system) occurred in 19.6% and 16.7% of patients of the first and second groups, respectively (p = 0.810). The duration of hospital stay was 3.0 (2.5; 3.0) and 2.7 (2.7; 3.0) days in the first and second groups, respectively (р=0,790).
Conclusion. The achieved reduced duration of MGB due to the reduced stage of gastrojejunostomy with self-retaining barbed unidirectional suture material, and comparable immediate effects of surgical treatment in patients of the first and second groups demonstrate significant outcomes. Further study is necessary to investigate long-term effects of the knotless suture application for a single anastomosis formation during MGB surgery.

About the authors

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Chaykin

Clinical hospital "RZD-Medicine" city Krasnoyarsk; Center of Endosurgical Technologies

Email: conte4@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-1761
SPIN-code: 4098-5263

Ph.D., surgeon; surgeon

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 60077, Krasnoyarsk, Aviatorov str., building 33

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Chaykin

Russian Railways-Medicine Clinical Hospital, Krasnoyarsk; Center for Endosurgical Technologies

Email: chaiki@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0994-081X

Ph.D., surgeon; surgeon

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 660077, Krasnoyarsk, Aviatorov str., building 33

Александр Nikolaevich Chaykin

Clinical hospital "RZD-Medicine" city Krasnoyarsk; Center of Endosurgical Technologies

Email: endotrv@rol.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3967-6995

Ph.D., surgeon; surgeon

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 660077, Krasnoyarsk, Aviatorov str., building 33

Yurii Semenovich Vinnik

Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: yuvinnik@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8995-2862
SPIN-code: 5070-8140

MD, Professor, surgeon; Head of the General Surgery Department named after Professor M. I. Gulman, Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 660022, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Partizan Zheleznyak, 1

Olga Valerievna Teplyakova

Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: teplyakova-olga@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0005-3316
https://krasgmu.ru

Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the General Surgery Department named after Professor M. I. Gulman

Russian Federation, 660022, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Partizan Zheleznyak, house 1

Aleksey Aleksandrovich Beloborodov

Clinical hospital "RZD-Medicine" city Krasnoyarsk;
V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: beloborodov-a5@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9602-6974
SPIN-code: 7009-8623

PhD, chief doctor; Associate Professor of the Department of nursing and clinical care

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 660022, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Partizan Zheleznyak, ed. 1.

Aleksandr Vladimirovich Ilinov

Clinical hospital "RZD-Medicine" city Krasnoyarsk; Center of Endosurgical Technologies; V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: vlad-izumrud@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8247-1388

surgeon; surgeon сenter of Endosurgical Technologies; Assistant of the General Surgery Department named after Professor M. I. Gulman

Russian Federation, 660058, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Lomonosov, 47; 660077, Krasnoyarsk, Aviatorov str., building 33; 660022, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, st. Partizan Zheleznyak, ed. 1.

References

  1. Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The Mini-Gastric Bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019; 61: 38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.042
  2. Haddad A, Bashir A, Fobi M, Higa K, Herrera MF, Torres AJ, Himpens J, Shikora S, Ramos AC, Kow L, Nimeri AA. The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes? Obes Surg. 2021; 31(4): 1411-1421. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05249-5
  3. Clapp B, Mosleh KA, Corbett J, Hage K, Moore RL, Billy H, Ponce J, Ghanem OM. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes Using the MBSAQIP. Obes Surg. 2023; 33(3): 720-724. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06452-2
  4. Li X, Hu X, Fu C, Han L, Xie M, Ouyang S. Efficacy and Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2023; 33(2): 611-622. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06401-5
  5. Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients. Obes Surg. 2018; 28(9): 2956-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3382-x
  6. Currie AC, Askari A, Fangueiro A, Mahawar K. Network Meta-Analysis of Metabolic Surgery Procedures for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes. Obes Surg. 2021; 31(10): 4528-4541. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05643-z
  7. Uhe I, Douissard J, Podetta M, Chevallay M, Toso C, Jung MK, Meyer J. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022; 30(3): 614-627. doi: 10.1002/oby.23338
  8. Sohrabi Maralani M, Azadnajafabad S, Elyasinia F, Abolhasani M, Bagheri M, Kor F, Ashrafi A, Talebpour M. Postoperative Outcomes and Advantages of Hand-Sewn Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Experience on 805 Patients. Obes Surg. 2021; 31(2): 627-633. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04981-8
  9. Major P, Stefura T, Walędziak M, Janik M, Pędziwiatr M, Wysocki M, Rubinkiewicz M, Witowski J, Szeliga J, Budzyński A. What Makes Bariatric Operations Difficult-Results of a National Survey. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(6): 218. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060218
  10. Ospanov OB. Surgical technique of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass with obstructive stapleless pouch creation: A case series. Int J Surg. 2019; 67: 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.011
  11. Yeleutov G. Clinical and economic evaluation of gastric bypass perfomed with and without staples. Surgeon. 2019; 11: 10-21. (In Russ.) doi: 0.33920/med-15-1911-02
  12. Khitaryan AG, Mezhunts AV, Starzhinskaya OB, Voronova OV, Veliev KS, Orekhov AA, Bolov ZA. The results of morbid obesity treatment by mini-gastric bypass via a stapler or suture gastroenteroanastomosis, comparative analysis. Endoscopic Surgery = Endoskopicheskaya Khirurgiya. 2018; 24(6): 19-28. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/endoskop20182406119
  13. Evdoshenko VV, Fedenko VV, Bordan NS, Matveev NL, Tsepkovsky AS. One-anastomosis gastric bypass with a short limb. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020; 11: 37-47. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202011137
  14. Raja BS, Gowda AKS, Choudhury AK, Paul S, Kalia RB. Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(7): 1156-1173. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00638-z
  15. Puchkov KV, Korennaia VV, Puchkov DK. Application of barbed sutures in gynecology and obstetrics. Endoscopic Surgery = Endoskopicheskaya Khirurgiya. 2014; 20(4): 46-51. (In Russ.)
  16. Nambi Gowri K, King MW. A Review of Barbed Sutures-Evolution, Applications and Clinical Significance. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(4): 419. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040419
  17. Samoilov VS, Glukhov АА. Clinical Observation of Several Complications at Different Stages Perform Bariatric Procedures. Vestnik of experimental and clinical surgery. 2016; 9(2): 138-144. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2016-9-2-149-155
  18. Lin Y, Long Y, Lai S, Zhang Y, Guo Q, Huang J, Du L. The Effectiveness and Safety of Barbed Sutures in the Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019; 29(6): 1756-1764. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03744-4
  19. Kolyadko PV, Kolyadko VP, Degovtsov EN, Samoilov VS, Stepanenko AV. Non-surgical treatment of staple-line suture leakage after redo sleeve gastrectomy. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2023; 3: 83-89. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202303183
  20. Costantino F, Dente M, Perrin P, Sarhan FA, Keller P. Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(10): 3846-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2993-5
  21. Bures C, Seika P, Denecke C, Pratschke J, Zorron R. Routine use of V-lock® suture for bariatric anastomosis is safe: comparative results from consecutive case series. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019; 32(3): e1452. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1452
  22. Burikov MA, Skazkin IV, Kinyakin AI, Shulgin OV. Performance method and results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic shunting in SADI-S modification with a narrow stomach sleeve and long total loop 350 cm. Endoscopic Surgery = Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2023; 29(3): 23-30. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/endoskop20232903123
  23. Bekova MA, Popov AA, Chantieva TM, Zav’yalova IV, Idashkin AD, Fedorov AA, Sopova YuI, Koval’ AA. Clinical observation of incomplete uterine rupture after combined treatment of infiltrative endometriosis and uterine myoma using self-fixing suture material V-Loc in myorrhaphy. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist = Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2023; 23(3): 105-109. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/rosakush202323031105
  24. Neymark MI, Pantyushin AA, Zhilin SV. Effect of mini-gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity on indicators of carbohydrate metabolism. Medical alphabet. 2022; (30): 37-40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33667/2078‑5631‑2022‑30‑37‑40
  25. Pennestrì F, Gallucci P, Prioli F, Giustacchini P, Ciccoritti L, Sessa L, Bellantone R, Raffaelli M. Barbed vs conventional sutures in bariatric surgery: a propensity score analysis from a high-volume center. Updates Surg. 2019; 71(1): 113-120. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0589-2
  26. Blanc P, Lointier P, Breton C, Debs T, Kassir R. The Hand-sewn Anastomosis with an Absorbable Bidirectional Monofilament Barbed Suture Stratafix® During Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Loop Gastric Bypass. Retrospective Study in 50 Patients. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(12): 2457-60. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1921-2
  27. Chaouch MA, Kellil T, Taieb SK, Zouari K. Barbed versus conventional thread used in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 406(4): 1015-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01979-9
  28. Dedov I, Mel'nichenko G, Shestakova M, Troshina E, Mazurina N, Shestakova E, Yashkov Y, Neimark A, Biryukova E, Bondarenko I, Bordan N, Dzgoeva F, Ershova E, Komshilova K, Mkrtumyan A, Petunina N, Romantsova T, Starostina E, Strongin L, Suplotova L, Fadeyev V. Russian national clinical recommendations for morbid obesity treatment in adults. 3rd revision (Morbid obesity treatment in adults). Obesity And Metabolism. 2018; 15(1): 53-70. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14341/omet2018153-70
  29. Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Cohen RV, de Luca M, Faria SL, Goodpaster KPS, Haddad A, Himpens JM, Kow L, Kurian M, Loi K, Mahawar K, Nimeri A, O'Kane M, Papasavas PK, Ponce J, Pratt JSA, Rogers AM, Steele KE, Suter M, Kothari SN. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2023; 33(1): 3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1
  30. Voskanyan SE, Samoylov VS, Redkin AN. Clinical assessment of operative time as a safety factor in bariatric surgery. Endoscopic Surgery = Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2022; 28(2): 34–42. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/endoskop20222802134
  31. Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Edwin B. Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events. ISRN Surg. 2013; 2013: 625093. doi: 10.1155/2013/625093
  32. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications. Ann. Surg. 2009; 250(2): 177-186. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afde41
  33. Vinnik YuS, Miller SV, Teplyakova OV. Minimally invasive urgent pancreatobiliary surgery in elderly patients. M: Infra-M. 2022; 276. (In Russ.)
  34. Wiggins T, Majid MS, Markar SR, Loy J, Agrawal S, Koak Y. Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020; 102(2): 153-159. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0106

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».