THE ETHICAL PARAMETERS OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The modern concept of personalized medicine involves the use of new methods of molecular analysis to improve the assessment of predisposition to diseases, their prevention and treatment. But personalization often understood only in terms of pharmacogenetics. At the same time, all the doctors are well aware that recovery often depends not on the nature of the intervention and/or effectiveness of drug therapy, and the patient believes in the therapy or not, wants to get better or prefer the role of patient, doctor like him or dislike and so forth. The influence of socio-psychological situation of the individual patient on the effectiveness of treatment by physicians is a factor, but it is not the subject of their professional interest. Therefore, the concept of personalized medicine is not complete and scientifically credible until such time as in its development will bring together specialists in Humanities, first of all, bioethics. The article discusses the following tasks of bioethics in the development of personalized medicine: risk of the assessment absolutization of pharmacogenetic testing, correction of application of methods of personalized medicine in accordance with the principles of bioethics (especially with the principle of justice), the development of ethics applications of personalized medicine in clinical practice, ethical conduct expertise scientific research in the field of personalized medicine, informing the public and medical professionals about the humanitarian effects of the practical application of personalized medicine.

About the authors

N. N Sedova

Volgograd medical scientific center

Email: nns18@yandex.ru
Doctor of philosophy, doctor of legal Sciences, Professor, head. Lab ethical, legal and sociological examination Volgograd

A. A Basov

HPE "Volgograd state medical University" of RMPH

Email: medsociolog@gmail.com
Candidate of sociological Sciences, Professor of philosophy, bioethics and law with course of medical sociology chair of sbee Volgograd

References

  1. Genomics and World Health. Report of a WHO scientific Group. HLB: QZ50 - 2002 - 125 p.
  2. Vogenberg F.R., Barash C.I., Pursel M. Personalized medicine. Part 2. Ethical, legal and regulatory issues. // P.T. -2010; 35(11): 624-42.
  3. Европейская Комиссия. Независимая экспертная группа. 25 рекомендаций по этике, юридическим и социальным последствиям генетического тестирования. Люксембург: Отдел официальных публикаций Европейского сообщества, 2004. 26 с.
  4. Feldman E.A. The genetic information nondiscrimination act (GINA): Public policy and medical practice in the age of personalized medicine. // J Gen Intern Med. - 2012; 27(6): 743-6.
  5. Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical issues in Medical Genetics and Genetic Services. Report of WHO Meeting on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics. Geneva, 15-16 December 1997.
  6. World Health Organization. Human Genetics Programme. 15 p.
  7. Powell K.P., Cogswell W.A., Christianson C.A., et al. Primary Care Physicians’ Awareness, Experience and Opinions of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing. // J Genet Couns. - 2011; 21: 113-26.
  8. Ohata T., Tsuchiya A., Watanabe M., et al. Phisicians' opinion for “new” genetic test in Japan. // J Hum Genet. - 2009; 54(4): 203-8.
  9. Raz A.E., Schichtanz S. Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: Moral attitudes of patients? relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel. // Med Health Care Philos. - 2009; 12(4): 433-442.
  10. Кононова С.К. Биоэтические проблемы применения ДНК-диагностики моногенных заболеваний в практике медико-генетической консультации Якутии. Автореф. дис.. канд. биол. наук - Уфа, 2004.
  11. Карымов О.Н. Отношение женщин к эстетической медицине в крупном промышленном городе / О.Н. Карымов, М.А. Бязрова // Социология города. 2013. - № 3. - С. 37 - 41;
  12. Карымов О.Н. Нарушение этических норм в косметологической практике / И.Ю. Крайнова, О.Н. Карымов, H.А. Воробьева // Биоэтика. 2013. - № 1(11) - С. 54 - 56.
  13. Ижевская В.Л. Современные методические и этические проблемы медико-генетического консультирования в России. Автореф. дис.. д. мед. наук - Москва, 2005.
  14. Седова Н.Н., Навроцкий Б.А. Отношение городских жителей к персонализированной медицине // Социология города. - 2015. - № 3. - С. 24 - 28.

Copyright (c) 2015 Sedova N.N., Basov A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies