Autonomy and care in the logic of competing and solidarity relations in medicine

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The interactions of the subjects of medicine are considered in the projection of two logics: solidary and competing relations. This approach develops the critique of the dominance of the concept of patient autonomy that comes with the bioethics represented in the ethics of care by K. Dörner, A. Moll and others. The conceptual forms of competition and solidarity are identified as oppositions to power and equality, autonomy and care, individualism and interdependence of subjects of medicine, anti-paternalism and paternalism, neglect and attentiveness, the legal and ethical meaning of informed consent, control and compliance, medical services and medical care.

In medicine, from point of view of bioethics, the solidary relations could be expressed in a paternalistic model. It is based on ethical connotations such as doctor's responsibility and mutual trust. Autonomy has a legal and economic predication. The ethics of care, traditional for the Russian cultural model, implies not so much the doctor's authorities over the patient, recognizing him as unequal in medical decisions, but in modern healthcare it can be combined with a voluntary expression of consent to medical interventions with the properly provided information.

About the authors

Tatyana A. Sidorova

Novosibirsk State National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: t.sidorova@g.ngu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8985-092X
ResearcherId: AAX-2059-2021

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamental Medicine, Institute for Medicine and Psychology

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

References

  1. Veatch R.M. Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict. Theoretical Medicine and Bioeth-ics Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice. 2012;33(1).
  2. Siluyanova I. V. Selected. About calling a doctor. Mos-cow: Publishing house of Forma LLC, 2008. 256 p. (in Rus.).
  3. Starobinets A.A. Look at him. Moscow, AST Publ., 2017. 115 p. (in Rus.).
  4. Vitch R. Models of moral medicine in the era of revolu-tionary changes. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philos-ophy. 1994;3:67–72. (in Rus.).
  5. Ivanyushkin A.Ya. Bioethics and psychiatry. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 1994;3:77–90. (in Rus.).
  6. Yastrebov V.S. Organization of Psychiatric Care: A His-torical Sketch. Rukovodstvo po psikhiatrii = Guide to Psychiatry. Ed. A.S. Tiganova. Moscow: Medicine, 1999. Vol. 1. 712 p. (in Rus.).
  7. Lekhtsiyer V.L. The logic of care versus the logic of choice in modern concepts of medical practice. Inter-aktsiya. Interv'yu. Interpretatsiya = Interaction. Inter-view. Interpretation. 2019;11(20):36–53. (in Rus.).
  8. Sidorova T.A., Zhichina Ye.Yu. Bioethical Content of Informed Voluntary Consent. Meditsinskoye pravo: te-oriya i praktika = Medical Law: Theory and Practice. 2016;2(1):239–244. (in Rus.).
  9. Tronto J.C. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. NY: Routledge, 1993.
  10. Mol A. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge; New York, 2008. 129 p.

Copyright (c) 2022 Sidorova T.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies