Catalytic steam cracking of heavy crude oil with molybdenum and nickel nanodispersed catalysts
- Authors: Mironenko O.O.1, Sosnin G.A.1,2, Eletskii P.M.1, Gulyaeva Y.K.1, Bulavchenko O.A.1,2, Stonkus O.A.1,2, Rodina V.O.1, Yakovlev V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
- Novosibirsk State University
- Issue: Vol 9, No 3 (2017)
- Pages: 221-229
- Section: Catalysis in Petroleum Refining Industry
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2070-0504/article/view/202580
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050417030084
- ID: 202580
Cite item
Abstract
The catalytic steam cracking (CSC) of heavy crude oil with high amount of sulfur (4.3 wt %) and high-boiling fractions (>500°C) is studied using Mo and Ni nanodispersed catalysts under static conditions (in an autoclave) at 425°C. Experiments on thermal cracking, steam cracking, and catalytic cracking without water are performed to compare and identify the features of CSC. The relationship between the composition and properties of liquid and gaseous products and process conditions, the type of catalyst, and water is studied. Using Ni catalyst in CSC raises the H: C ratio (1.69) in liquid products, compared to other types of cracking, but also increases the yield of coke and gaseous products, so the yield of liquid products falls. When Mo catalyst is used in CSC, low-viscosity semi-synthetic oil with a higher H: C ratio (1.70) and the lowest amount of sulfur in liquid products (2.8 wt %) is produced. XRF and HRTEM studies of the catalyst-containing solid residue (coke) show that under CSC conditions, nickel is present in the form of well-crystallized nanoparticles of Ni9S8 15–40 nm in size, while molybdenum exists in two phases: MoO2 and MoS2, the ratio between which depends on the conditions of the transformation of heavy crude oil. The findings indicate that CSC is a promising process for improving heavy crude oil.
About the authors
O. O. Mironenko
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
G. A. Sosnin
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
P. M. Eletskii
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
Yu. K. Gulyaeva
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
O. A. Bulavchenko
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
O. A. Stonkus
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
V. O. Rodina
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
V. A. Yakovlev
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Author for correspondence.
Email: yakovlev@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
Supplementary files
