Reconstruction of built-up urban areas taking into account accessibility to limited mobility population groups: the case of Krasnodar

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The development of a comfortable living environment for persons with disabilities is one of the most important tasks in the modern world. To a large extent, its implementation depends on housing conditions of wheelchair users, as well as principles of their settlement in multi-apartment residential buildings in cities. Physical barriers in the architectural environment are the most pressing problem hindering rehabilitation and socialization of disabled persons. Uncomfortable housing conditions can hinder therapeutic and preventive care aimed at health improvement, and physical barriers in housing and yard spaces can hamper the socialization of disabled residents. The problem is more relevant than ever, because due to the ongoing Special Military Operation, the number of physically challenged persons is growing fast. With this in mind, it is important to continue adapting residential buildings for limited mobility population groups and creating a more comfortable environment for all urban residents.Materials and methods. The article analyzes (1) the way wheelchair users take up residence in large-scale development areas in the post-war Krasnodar, (2) the settlement of wheelchair users in urban districts, (3) the residence of wheelchair users in buildings with a different number of storeys. Contradictions are identified between current urban development conditions and surrounding architecture, on the one hand, and the needs of limited mobility residents, including their socialization, on the other hand. Criteria for selecting design solutions are developed; recommendations are provided for the reconstruction of existing residential buildings, equipping and modernizing the urban environment, raising awareness of problems to be tackled by disabled persons.Results. A list of steps is proposed to solve problems of housing conditions and principles of resettlement of disabled persons. In particular, factors impeding the treatment, preventive care and socialization of wheelchair users are considered, and their elimination plan is proposed. The article provides a theoretical justification for techniques and principles of architectural design of buildings, taking into account the accessibility of standard residential buildings to limited mobility persons.Conclusions. The article describes methods and techniques for solving several most important problems of wheelchair users in Krasnodar, in particular, their accessible living environment. The appropriateness of the settlement of disabled persons in the existing urban development and reconstruction of this architectural environment were analyzed; methods for designing buildings that meet the housing requirements of limited mobility persons were presented. Also, a social approach to developing a comfortable living environment for such members of society was formulated and analyzed to ensure their integration into the life of society, equal access to infrastructure, work and education.

About the authors

E. P. Shnurnikova

Kuban State Technological University (KubSTU)

Email: shnurnikova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8061-0965

S. P. Gorzova

Kuban State Technological University (KubSTU)

Email: gorsp-sp04@mail.ru

V. V. Kononenko

Kuban State Technological University (KubSTU)

Email: kononenko.lera03@mail.ru

References

  1. Замятина И.И., Оруджев Н.Я. Недееспособный человек в городе — кто он? // Социология города. 2014. № 1. С. 13–21. EDN RYQEZD.
  2. Смирнов С.А. Город и Человек: очерки по городской антропологии // Город: Архитектура, история, управление. 2021. № 17. 280 с.
  3. Петренко Я.С., Шнурникова Е.П. Доступная среда для проживания инвалидов-колясочников на примере города Краснодар // Наука. Техника. Технологии (политехнический вестник). 2022. № 4. С. 215–219. EDN THHCLZ.
  4. Зима А.Г. Проблема адаптации архитектурной среды под нужды маломобильных групп населения и понятие универсального дизайна // Оригинальные исследования. 2020. Т. 10. № 5. С. 268–275. EDN BWDRJB.
  5. Gissen D. The architecture of disability: buildings, cities, and landscapes beyond access. University of Minnesota Press, 2022. 224 p.
  6. Крюков А.Р., Смурова Н.Ю., Семикин П.П. Приспособление жилого фонда для проживания маломобильных групп населения // Жилищное строительство. 2012. № 11. С. 22–25. EDN PUVZSF.
  7. Зиятдинова А.Р., Фахрутдинова И.А. Подходы к проектированию соседских пространств в контексте социологических теорий создания благоприятной городской среды // Известия Казанского государственного архитектурно-строительного университета. 2017. № 2 (40). С. 60–69. EDN YQQQLB.
  8. Алексеева Е.С. Основные принципы проектирования доступного жилья для маломобильных групп населения // Современная наука и инновации. 2015. № 2 (10). С. 123–127. EDN UMMCHL.
  9. Deitz S., Lobben A., Alferez A. Squeaky wheels: Missing data, disability, and power in the smart city // Big Data & Society. 2021. Vol. 8. Issue 2. doi: 10.1177/20539517211047735
  10. Halder S., Argyropoulos V. Inclusion, equi-ty and access for individuals with disabilities. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5962-0
  11. Wolniak R., Skotnicka-Zasadzien B. The perception of architectural barriers by disabled persons based on the case of the city hall of Katowice // International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2014. 2014. Pp. 1025–1032. doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B12/S2.131. EDN EBUXWW.
  12. Senghor D.B., Diop O., Sombié I. Analysis of the impact of healthcare support initiatives for physically disabled people on their access to care in the city of Saint-Louis, Senegal // BMC Health Services Research. 2017. Vol. 17. Issue S2. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2644-y
  13. Mustafaev A.M. Analysis of the effectiveness of reconstruction of industrial buildings // Economics and Management of a National Economy. 2021. No. 11. Pp. 505–515.
  14. Dobritsyna I. Spatialization as a special form of the spatial organization of the city, objectifying social existence // Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Architecture: Heritage, Traditions and Innovations (AHTI 2019). 2019. doi: 10.2991/ahti-19.2019.89
  15. Шолух Н.В., Васылев В.Н., Анисимов А.В. Обеспечение беспрепятственного доступа инвалидам к жилым и социально значимым объектам города в условиях значительных нормативных и планировочных ограничений // Вестник Донбасской национальной академии строительства и архитектуры. 2018. № 3 (131). С. 88–100. EDN YMZPSH.
  16. Абрамова С.Б. Здоровьесберегающее городское пространство как маркер реализации права на город молодых инвалидов // XXII Уральские социологические чтения. Национальные проекты и социально-экономическое развитие Уральского региона : мат. Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. 2020. С. 222–226. EDN NTSPIC.
  17. Regenbrecht K. Social protection and adaptation of disabled people in Germany. 2010. P. 30.
  18. Alaniz J. Disability // Keywords for Comics Studies. 2021. Pp. 70–73.
  19. Date K., Allweil Y. Towards a new image archive for the built environment // Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 2021. Vol. 49. Issue 2. Pp. 519–534. doi: 10.1177/23998083211011474
  20. Рахманова М.С. Анализ показателей оценки эффективности реализации муниципальной программы «Доступная среда» на 2014–2020 годы // Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. 2021. Т. 10. № 4 (37). С. 221–223. doi: 10.26140/anie-2021-1004-0052. EDN QZPVER.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).