Historical and Institutional Determinants of Universities’ Role in Fostering Entrepreneurship

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Institutions play a key role in building entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). However, the academic literature does not well represent the historical roots of these institutions and most works are devoted to developed countries. This article examines the institutional conditions for the development of scientific and entrepreneurial activities at universities in the context of the transition to a market economy. It considers the «path dependence» (mentality and infrastructure inherited from the past), as well as specific mechanisms for regulating the interaction of universities and other subjects of EE developed during the transition period. Such an approach allows us to assess the potential of universities for the development of entrepreneurship in countries with a transition economy and the impact of historical development paths upon the current structural conditions and the specific features of the EE.

作者简介

Alexander Chepurenko

HSE University

Email: achepurenko@hse.ru

Maria Kristalova

Friedrich Schiller University Jena; University of Bremen

Email: maria.kristalova@uni-jena.de
Germany, Carl-Zeiss-Strasse 3, 07743 Jena, Germany; Germany, Bibliothekstrasse 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany

Michael Wyrwich

Friedrich Schiller University Jena; Groningen University

Email: m.wyrwich@rug.nl
Carl-Zeiss-Strasse 3, 07743 Jena, Germany; Nettelbosje 2, 9747 AE Groningen, Netherlands

参考

  1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. (2012) Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty (1st ed.). New York: Crown Publishers.
  2. Acs Z., Storey D. (2004) Introduction: Entrepreneurship and Economic Development // Regional Studies. Vol. 38. № 8. Р. 871-877. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280901
  3. Acs Z., Szerb L., Lloyd A. (2018) Global Entrepreneurship Index 2018. Washington, D.C.: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI).
  4. Acs Z.J., Autio E., Szerb L. (2014) National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications // Research Policy. Vol. 43. № 3. P. 476-494. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
  5. Aidis R., Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. (2008) Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 23. № 6. Р. 656-672. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005
  6. Aidis R., Welter F. (2008a) Innovation and entrepreneurship: Successful start-ups and businesses in emerging economies / Eds. R. Aidis, F. Welter. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  7. Aidis R., Welter F. (2008b) The cutting edge: Innovation and entrepreneurship in New Europe / Eds. R. Aidis, F. Welter. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  8. Aldieri L., Kotsemir M.N., Vinci C.P. (2018) Knowledge spillover effects: Empirical evidence from Russian regions // Quality & Quantity. Vol. 52. № 5. Р. 2111-2132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0624-2
  9. Alexeev M., Mamedov A. (2017) Factors determining intra-regional fiscal decentralization in Russia and the US // Russian Journal of Economics. Vol. 3. № 4. Р. 425-444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.007
  10. Alvedalen J., Boschma R. (2017) A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies. Vol. 25. № 6. Р. 887-903. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
  11. Astebro B.T., Bazzazian N. (2011) Universities, Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development // Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. National and Regional Perspectives / Ed. M. Fritsch. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
  12. Audretsch D.B. (2003) Innovation and Spatial Externalities // International Regional Science Review. Vol. 26. № 2. Р. 167-174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017602250973
  13. Audretsch D.B., Belitski M. (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 42. № 5. Р. 1030-1051. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
  14. Baumol W.J. (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 98. № 5. P. 893-921.
  15. Belitski M., Aginskaja A., Marozau R. (2019) Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? // Research Policy. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 601-615. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011
  16. Bergmann H., Golla S. (2016) Unternehmertum an Hochschulen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students‘ Survey (GUESSS) 2016. St. Gallen: Universitat St. Gallen, Hochschule Fulda. Режим доступа:http://www.guesssurvey.org/resources/nat_2016/GUESSS-Bericht-Deutschland-2016_30Sept2016.pdf, дата обращения 23.04.2019.
  17. Bessonova E., Gonchar K. (2015) Bypassing weak institutions in a large late-comer economy // Journal of Institutional Economics. Vol. 11. № 4. Р. 847-874.
  18. Beugelsdijk S. (2007) Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 187-210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0048-y
  19. Bijedic T., Maass F., Schröder C., Werner A. (2015) Der Einfluss institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen auf die Gründungsneigung von Wissenschaftlern an deutschen Hochschulen. IfM-Materialien. Vol. 233. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung.
  20. Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1995) Privatizing Russia. Cambridge, MA., London: MIT Press.
  21. Bruneel J., D'Este P., Salter A. (2010) Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration // Research Policy. Vol. 39. № 7. P. 858-868. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
  22. Bruton G.D., Ahlstrom D., Li H.-L. (2010) Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 34. № 3. P. 421-440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
  23. Carlsson B., Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Braunerhjelm P. (2009) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review // Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 18. № 6. Р. 1193-1229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043
  24. Cavallo A., Ghezzi A., Balocco R. (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 43. № 3. P. 476-507. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3
  25. Chepurenko A., Popovskaya E., Obraztsova O. (2017) Cross-regional Variations in the Motivation of Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity in Russia: Determining Factors // Entrepreneurship in transition economies. Diversity, trends, and perspectives / Eds. A. Sauka, A. Chepurenko. Vol. 23. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. P. 315-342.
  26. Clark B.R. (1998) The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response // Tertiary Education and Management. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 5-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941
  27. D'Este P., Perkmann M. (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36. № 3. P. 316-339. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
  28. Di Gregorio D., Shane S. (2003) Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? // Research Policy. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 209-227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
  29. Diez J.R. (2000) The Importance of Public Research Institutes in Innovative Networks - Empirical Results from the Metropolitan Innovation Systems. Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna // European Planning Studies. Vol. 8. № 4. P. 451-463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/713666418
  30. Elert N., Henrekson M., Stenkula M. (2017) Institutional Reform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Europe. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  31. Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. (2011) Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies: The Role of Institutions and Generational Change // The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Evidence from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data / Ed. M. Minniti. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 181-208.
  32. Etzkowitz H. (2001) The Second Academic Revolution and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science // IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 18-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/44.948843
  33. Etzkowitz H. (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms': The invention of the entrepreneurial university // Research Policy. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 109-121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
  34. Feige E.L. (1997) Underground Activity and Institutional Change: Productive, Protective and Predatory Behavior in Transition Economies // Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies / Eds. J.M. Nelson, C. Tilly, L. Walker. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. P. 21-35.
  35. Freytag A., Thurik R. (2007) Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 117-131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0044-2
  36. Fritsch M., Bublitz E., Sorgner A., Wyrwich M. (2014) How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy // Small Business Economics. Vol. 43. № 2. P. 427-446. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9544-x
  37. Fritsch M., Storey D.J. (2014) Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges // Regional Studies. Vol. 48. № 6. P. 939-954. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574
  38. Fritsch M., Titze M., Piontek M. (2018) Knowledge interactions in regional innovation networks: Comparing data sources. Jena Economic Research Paper 2018-003. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena. Режим доступа:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174380, дата обращения 13.03.2019.
  39. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2014) The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925-2005 // Regional Studies. Vol. 48. № 6. P. 955-973. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816414
  40. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2017a) The effect of entrepreneurship on economic development - An empirical analysis using regional entrepreneurship culture // Journal of Economic Geography. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 157-189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv049
  41. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. (2017b) Persistence of Regional Entrepreneurship: Causes, Effects, and Directions for Future Research // International Review of Entrepreneurship. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 395-416.
  42. Froumin I., Kouzminov Y., Semyonov D. (2014) Institutional diversity in Russian higher education: Revolutions and evolution // European Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 209-234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2014.916532
  43. Fuster E., Padilla-Meléndez A., Lockett N., del-Águila-Obra A.R. (2019) The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 141. P. 219-231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020
  44. Gershman M., Gokhberg L., Kuznetsova T., Roud V. (2018) Bridging S&T and innovation in Russia: A historical perspective // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 133. P. 132-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.014
  45. Ghio N., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C. (2019) The creation of high-tech ventures in entrepreneurial ecosystems: exploring the interactions among university knowledge, cooperative banks, and individual attitudes // Small Business Economics. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 523-543. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3
  46. Gianiodis P.T., Markman G.D., Panagopoulos A. (2016) Entrepreneurial universities and overt opportunism // Small Business Economics. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 609-631. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9753-6
  47. Goethner M., Wyrwich M. (2017) Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: The role of business schools. Jena Economic Research Paper 2017-017. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena. Режим доступа:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174377, дата обращения 13.03.2019.
  48. Gokhberg L. (2004) Russia's National Innovation System and the New Economy // Problems of Economic Transition. Vol. 46. № 9. P. 8-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2004.11049870
  49. Gokhberg L., Kuznetsova T. (2011) S&T and Innovation in Russia: Key Challenges of the Post-Crisis Period // Journal of East-West Business. Vol. 17. № 2-3. P. 73-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2011.634769
  50. Graf H. (2011) Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 173-198.
  51. Grimpe C., Fier H. (2010) Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 35. № 6. P. 637-650. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4
  52. Guerrero M., Urbano D., Fayolle A., Klofsten M., Mian S. (2016) Entrepreneurial universities: Emerging models in the new social and economic landscape // Small Business Economics. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 551-563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4
  53. Gurvich E. (2016) Institutional constraints and economic development // Russian Journal of Economics. Vol. 2. № 4. P. 349-374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.11.002
  54. Hassink R., Wood M. (1998) Geographic ‘clustering' in the German opto electronics industry // Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 277-296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629800000016
  55. Heller R. (2013) The Russian Innovation Ecosystem 2013 // International Journal of Innovation Science. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 119-130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.5.2.119
  56. Hewitt-Dundas N. (2013) The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 38. № 2. P. 93-115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9229-4
  57. Kauffeld-Monz M., Fritsch M. (2013) Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis // Regional Studies. Vol. 47. № 5. P. 669-685. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713365
  58. Keeble D., Lawson C., Smith H.L., Moore B., Wilkinson F. (1998) Internationalisation Processes, Networking and Local Embeddedness in Technology-Intensive Small Firms // Small Business Economics. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 327-342.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007942612220.
  59. Korobkov A., Zayonchkovskaya Z.A. (2012) Russian brain drain: Myths v. reality // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Vol. 45. № 3-4. P. 327-341.
  60. Korosteleva J., Belitski M. (2017) Entrepreneurial dynamics and higher education institutions in the post-Communist world // Regional Studies. Vol. 51. № 3. P. 439-453. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1103370
  61. Kutsenko E., Meissner D. (2013) Key Features of the First Phase of the National Cluster Program in Russia. HSE Working Paper WP BRP 11/STI/2013. Moscow: HSE. Режим доступа:http://www.clusterobservatory.eu/eco/uploaded/pdf/1366786413378.pdf, дата обращения 15.02.2019.
  62. Lamberova N., Sonin K. (2018) Economic transition and the rise of alternative institutions // Economics of Transition. Vol. 26. № 4. P. 615-648. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12167
  63. Leyden D.P., Link A.N. (2013) Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: The role of universities // Small Business Economics. Vol. 41. № 4. P. 797-817. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9507-7
  64. Lockett A., Siegel D., Wright M., Ensley M.D. (2005) The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications // Research Policy. Vol. 34. № 7. P. 981-993.
  65. Manolova T.S., Eunni R.V., Gyoshev B.S. (2008) Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 203-218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00222.x
  66. McMillan J., Woodruff C. (2002) The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 153-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767
  67. Meissner D. (2018) Entrepreneurial Universities: Towards a Revised Paradigm // Innovation and the Entrepreneurial University / Eds. D. Meissner, E. Erdil, J. Chataway. Heildelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. P. 37-55.
  68. Meissner D., Shmatko N. (2017) Keep open: The potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new Knowledge Triangle // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 123. P. 191-198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.012
  69. Mueller S.L., Thomas A.S. (2001) Culture and entrepreneurial potential // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 51-75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00039-7
  70. North D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  71. O'Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Chevalier A., Roche F. (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities // Research Policy. Vol. 34. № 7. P. 994-1009.
  72. OECD (2019) Local entrepreneurship ecosystems and emerging industries: Case study of Malopolskie, Poland. LEED Working Paper 03. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа:https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/local-entrepreneurship-ecosystems-and-emerging-industries-case-study-of-malopolskie-poland_d99ba985-en, дата обращения 16.05.2019.
  73. Ovaska T., Sobel R. (2005) Entrepreneurship in Post-Socialist Economies // Journal of Private Enterprise. Vol. 21. Issue Fall. P. 8-28.
  74. Perkmann M., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., D'Este P., Fini R., Geuna A., Grimaldi R., Hughes A., Krabel S., Kitson M., Llerena P., Lissoni F., Salter A., Sobrero M. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations // Research Policy. Vol. 42. № 2. P. 423-442. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  75. Polterovich V. (2017) Institutional Trap // The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics / Eds. L.E. Blume, S.N. Durlauf. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 1-7. Режим доступа:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311907319_Institutional_Trap, дата обращения 12.04.2019.
  76. Powers J.B., McDougall P.P. (2005) University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 291-311.
  77. Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature // Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 16. № 4. P. 691-791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023
  78. Roundy P.T. (2017) Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 1221-1237. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0452-9
  79. Roundy P.T., Fayard D. (2019) Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Micro-Foundations of Regional Entrepreneurship // The Journal of Entrepreneurship. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 94-120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355718810296
  80. Sauka A., Chepurenko A.Yu. (eds.) (2017) Entrepreneurship in transition economies: Diversity, trends, and perspectives. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
  81. Sauka A., Welter F. (2007) Productive, unproductive and destructive entrepreneurship in an advanced transition setting: The example of Latvian small enterprises // Empirical entrepreneurship in Europe. New perspectives / Eds. M.J. Dowling, J. Schmude. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 87-105.
  82. Schubert T., Kroll H. (2016) Universities' effects on regional GDP and unemployment: The case of Germany // Papers in Regional Science. Vol. 95. № 3. P. 467-489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12150
  83. Schätzl L. (1999) Regionen: Kompetenzzentren und Globalisierung // Vision und Verantwortung. Herausforderungen an der Schwelle zum neuen Jahrtausend / Eds. H. Hesse, B. Rebe. Hildesheim: Olms. P. 97-107.
  84. Shane S. (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  85. Sivak E., Yudkevich M.M. (2017) The academic profession in Russia's two capitals: The impact of 20 years of transition // European Educational Research Journal. Vol. 16. № 5. P. 626-644.
  86. Smallbone D., Welter F. (2001) The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies // Small Business Economics. Vol. 16. № 4. P. 249-262.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011159216578.
  87. Smallbone D., Welter F. (2006) Conceptualising entrepreneurship in a transition context // International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 190-206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2006.008928
  88. Smolentseva A., Huisman J., Froumin I. (2018) Transformation of Higher Education Institutional Landscape in Post-Soviet Countries: From Soviet Model to Where? // 25 Years of Transformations of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries. Reform and Continuity / Eds. J. Huisman, A. Smolentseva, I. Froumin. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 1-43.
  89. Sorenson O. (2017) Regional ecologies of entrepreneurship // Journal of Economic Geography. Vol. 17. № 5. P. 959-974. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx031
  90. Sosnovskikh S. (2017) Industrial clusters in Russia: The development of special economic zones and industrial parks // Russian Journal of Economics. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 174-199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.06.004
  91. Spigel B. (2017) The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 41. № 1. P. 49-72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
  92. Stam E. (2014) The Dutch Entrepreneurial Ecosystem // SSRN Electronic Journal. Режим доступа:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2473475, дата обращения 15.06.2019.
  93. Stam E. (2015) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique // European Planning Studies. Vol. 23. № 9. P. 1759-1769. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
  94. Stuetzer M., Audretsch D.B., Obschonka M., Gosling S.D., Rentfrow P.J., Potter J. (2018) Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions // Regional Studies. Vol. 52. № 5. P. 608-618. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1294251
  95. Szerb L., Trumbull W.N. (2018) Entrepreneurship development in Russia: Is Russia a normal country? An empirical analysis // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol. 25. № 6. P. 902-929. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0033
  96. Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C. (2002) Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing // Management Science. Vol. 48. № 1. P. 90-104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
  97. Ulhøi J., Neergaard H., Bjerregaard T. (2012) Beyond Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer // International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 287-299. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2012.0093
  98. Velt H., Torkkeli L., Saarenketo S. (2018) The entrepreneurial ecosystem and born globals: The Estonian context // Journal of Enterprising Communities. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 117-138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2017-0056
  99. Volchek D., Henttonen K., Edelmann J. (2013) Exploring the Role of a Country's Institutional Environment in Internationalization: Strategic Responses of SMEs in Russia // Journal of East-West Business. Vol. 19. № 4. P. 317-350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2013.851140
  100. Welter F. (2005) Entrepreneurial Behaviour in Differing Environments // Local Heroes in the Global Village. Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies / Eds. D. Audretsch, H. Grimm, C.W. Wessner. Boston, MA: Springer Science, Business Media Inc. P. 93-112.
  101. Welter F. (2011) Contextualizing Entrepreneurship-Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 165-184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
  102. Wyrwich M. (2012) Regional Entrepreneurial Heritage in a Socialist and a Postsocialist Economy // Economic Geography. Vol. 88. № 4. P. 423-445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01166.x
  103. Wyrwich M. (2013) Can socioeconomic heritage produce a lost generation with regard to entrepreneurship? // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 28. № 5. P. 667-682.
  104. Wyrwich M. (2015) Entrepreneurship and the intergenerational transmission of values // Small Business Economics. Vol. 45. № 1. P. 191-213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9649-x
  105. Yudkevich M.M. (2014) The Russian University: Recovery and Rehabilitation // Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 39. № 8. P. 1463-1474.
  106. Yukhanaev A., Fallon G., Baranchenko Y., Anisimova A. (2015) An Investigation into the Formal Institutional Constraints that Restrict Entrepreneurship and SME Growth in Russia // Journal of East-West Business. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 313-341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2015.1092190
  107. Zahra S.A., Nambisan S. (2012) Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems // Business Horizons. Vol. 55. № 3. P. 219-229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004
  108. Zhuplev A., Shtykhno D. (2009) Motivations and Obstacles for Small Business Entrepreneurship in Russia: Fifteen Years in Transition // Journal of East-West Business. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 25-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10669860902900347

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».