Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

It is widely recognized that one of the factors determining current and future socioeconomic development is the level of digitalization shaping a new type of society — the information society. One area of ICT application within information society is e-Government. A relatively low level of development of e-Government services in Poland was behind the search for the causes of this phenomenon. Among many technological, organizational, human, economic, social, and cultural factors determining the development of e-Government, many researchers indicated trust as one of the most critical factors. Mistrust is perceived as a basic limitation for the implementation of e-Government solutions. The author’s object of interest was e-Declaration technology, which enables electronic filling and sending of tax returns to tax authorities. This article investigates the relationship between the features of technology users and their trust in the e-Declaration technology and their future intention to use the technology. The researched user traits refer to their general trust, overall trust in technology and science development, and their experience and trust in the internet. Data was collected with the use of the CATI (Computer Assisted Web Interview) technique. Altogether, 1,054 completed questionnaires were selected, containing 100% of the answers. The regression analysis was preceded by an analysis of correlations between variables. The hypotheses were confirmed using the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test. The obtained results confirmed positive relationships between Trust in e-Declaration (T) and all tested constructs: General Trust (GT), overall Trust in Science and Technology (TST), Trust in the Internet (TinI) and Internet Experience (IE). Results also confirmed a positive impact of Trust in e-Declaration (T) on the Future Intention (FI) to use the technology. In the adopted regression model, Trust in the Internet was recognized as a key factor in the success of e-Government development. Therefore, the Polish government, which offers solutions in the field of e-Government and wants to increase trust in the technology as well as extend future adaptations of the technology, should concentrate on building trust in the internet and the development of technology and science in general.

About the authors

Joanna Ejdys

Bialystok University of Technology

Email: j.ejdys@pb.edu.pl
45A, Wiejska Street, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

References

  1. Agag G.M., El-Masry A.A. (2017) Why Do Consumers Trust Online Travel Websites? Drivers and Outcomes of Consumer Trust toward Online Travel Websites // Journal of Travel Research. Vol. 56. № 3. Р. 347-369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643185
  2. Al-Hujran O., Al-Debei M.M., Chatfield A., Migdadi M. (2015) The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use // Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 53. Р. 189-203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
  3. Alzahrani L., Al-Karaghouli W., Weerakkody V. (2017) Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens' perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework // International Business Review. Vol. 26. № 1. Р. 164-175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
  4. Belanger F., Carter L. (2008) Trust and risk in e-Government adoption // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 17. № 2. Р. 165-176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
  5. Carter L., Belanger F. (2005) The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors // Information Systems Journal. Vol. 15. № 1. Р. 5-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  6. Chen J.V., Jubilado R.J.M., Capistrano E.P.S., Yen D.C. (2015) Factors affecting online tax filing - An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory // Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 43. Р. 251-262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017
  7. Chopra K., Wallace W.A. (2003) Trust in electronic environments // Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. Р. 123-135.
  8. Colesca S.E. (2009) Understanding Trust in e-Government // Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics. Vol. 63. № 4. Р. 1-15. Режим доступа:http://inzeko.ktu.lt/index.php/EE/issue/view/424, дата обращения 24.05.2019.
  9. Davis F.D. (1985) A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new and-user information systems: Theory and results. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
  10. Ejdys J., Halicka K. (2018) Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology - The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults // Sustainability. Vol. 10. № 10. Art. 3770. Режим доступа:https://doi.org, дата обращения 15.09.2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103770
  11. Gefen D. (2004) What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness // Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 263-288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045792
  12. Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. (2003a) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model // MIS Quarterly. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 51-90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  13. Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D.W. (2003b) Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. 50. № 3. P. 307-321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817277
  14. Halicka K. (2019) Gerontechnology - the assessment of one selected technology improving the quality of life of older adults // Engineering Management in Production and Services. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 43-51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0010
  15. Hengstler M., Enkel E., Duelli S. (2016) Applied artificial intelligence and trust - The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices // Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 105. P. 105-120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014
  16. Hernandez-Ortega B. (2011) The role of post-use trust in the acceptance of a technology: Drivers and consequences // Technovation. Vol. 31. № 10-11. P. 523-538. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.07.001
  17. Joshi P., Shareeful I. (2018) E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries // Sustainability. Vol. 10. Art. 1882. P. 1-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882
  18. Kaur K., Rampersad G. (2018) Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. Vol. 48. P. 87-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006
  19. Khalilzadeh J., Ozturk A.B., Bilgihan A. (2017) Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry // Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 70. P. 460-474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001
  20. Komiak S.Y.X., Benbasat I.A. (2008) Two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study // Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Vol. 9. № 12. P. 727-747. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00180
  21. Kumar V.V.R., Lall A., Mane T. (2017) Extending the TAM Model: Intention of Management Students to Use Mobile Banking: Evidence from India // Global Business Review. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 238-249. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916666991
  22. Kurfal M., Arifoglu A., Tokdemir G., Pacin Y. (2017) Adoption of e-government services in Turkey // Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 66. P. 168-178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041
  23. Lankton N.K., McKnight D.H., Tripp J. (2015) Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology // Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Vol. 16. № 10. P. 880-918. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411
  24. Lean K., Zailani S., Ramayah T., Fernando Y. (2009) Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia // International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 29. № 6. P. 458-475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012
  25. Lee J., Kim H. J., Ahn M.J. (2011) The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology // Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 222-230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.007
  26. Lee M.K.O., Turban E. (2001) A trust model for consumer internet shopping // International Journal of Electronic Commerce. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 75-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227
  27. Lin J., Wang B., Wang N., Lu Y. (2014) Understanding the evolution of consumer trust in mobile commerce: A longitudinal study // Information Technology and Management. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 37-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-013-0172-y
  28. Lippert S.K. (2007) Investigating Postadoption Utilization: An Examination Into the Role of Interorganizational and Technology Trust // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. 54. № 3. P. 468-483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.900792
  29. Lippert S.K., Swiercz P.M. (2005) Human resource information systems (HRIS) and technology trust // Journal of Information Science. Vol. 31. № 5. P. 340-353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505055399
  30. McKnight D.H., Cummings L.L., Chervany N.L. (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 473-490. Режим доступа:https://www.jstor.org/stable/259290, дата обращения 09.06.2019.
  31. Meng D., Min Q., Li Y. (2008) Study on trust in mobile commerce adaptation - A conceptual model // Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security, 3-5 August, Guangzhou City, China. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. P. 246-249. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 12.11.2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECS.2008.54
  32. Nazarko J., Ejdys J., Halicka K., Magruk A., Nazarko L., Skorek A. (2017) Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology // Procedia Engineering. Vol. 182. P. 482-490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.140
  33. Nazarko L. (2016) Responsible Research and Innovation - A New Paradigm of Technology Management. Paper presented at the 9th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2016, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. May 12-13, 2016. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2016.71
  34. Nazarko L. (2017) Future-Oriented Technology Assessment // Procedia Engineering. Vol. 182. P. 504-509. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.144
  35. Pavlou P., Fygenson M. (2006) Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour // MIS Quarterly. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 115-143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148720
  36. Rousseau D.M., Sitkin S.B., Burt R.S., Camerer C. (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 393-403. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
  37. Tams S., Thatcher J. B., Craig K. (2018) How and why trust matters in post-adoptive usage: The mediating roles of internal and external self-efficacy // Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 27. P. 170-190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.004
  38. Venkatesh V., Thong J.Y., Xu X. (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology // MIS Quarterly. Vol. 36. № 1. P. 157-178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  39. Voutinioti A. (2013) Determinants of User Adoption of e-Government Services in Greece and the role of Citizen Service Centres // Procedia Technology. Vol. 8. P. 238-244. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 08.08.2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.033
  40. Weerakkody V., El-Haddadeh R., Al-Sobhi F., Shareef M.A., Dwivedi Y.K. (2013) Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation // International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 33. № 5. P. 716-725.
  41. Williams M.D., Rana N.P., Dwivedi Y.K. (2015) The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 443-488. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
  42. Wu K., Zhao Y., Zhu Q., Tan X., Zheng H. (2011) A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type // International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 31. № 6. P. 572-581. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
  43. Zhou T. (2011) An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile banking // Internet Research. Vol. 21. № 5. P. 527-540. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111176353

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).