The Impact of R&D Expenditure upon the Efficiency of M&A Deals with Hi-Tech Companies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The motives behind merger and acquisitions (M&A) are often linked with the opportunities to obtain knowledge and technologies in order to enhance the competitive advantages of companies. In particular, the acquisition of digital technologies through mergers and acquisitions with ICT companies is especially relevant. However, the efficiency of such deals is often low and calls into question the implementation of digitalization strategies of companies. In this study we employ an approach for assessing the efficiency of M&A deals with ICT companies by using the DEA method. Applying regression analysis, it was found that the high level of research and development expenses of acquirers can negatively impact the efficiency of the M&A deals with ICT companies.

About the authors

E. Ochirova

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: eochirova@hse.ru

Y. Dranev

HSE University

Email: ydranev@hse.ru

References

  1. Ahuja G., Katila R. (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
  2. Alam A., Uddin M., Yazdifar H. (2019) Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.007
  3. Andrade G., Stafford E. (2004) Investigating the economic role of mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10 (1), 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00023-8
  4. Audretsch D.B., Belitski M. (2020) The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity. European Economic Review, 123, 103391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103391
  5. Belderbos R., Cassiman B., Faems D., Leten B., Van Looy B. (2014) Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 841-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
  6. Benou G., Madura J. (2005) High-tech acquisitions, firm specific characteristics and the role of investment bank advisors. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(1), 101-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2005.06.006
  7. Bloningen B.A., Taylor C.T. (2000) R&D intensity and acquisitions in high technology industries: Evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 68(1), 47-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/117483.
  8. Bogetoft P., Wang D. (2005) Estimating the Potential Gains from Mergers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 145-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-1326-7
  9. Bravo-Ortega C., Marin A.G. (2011) R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue? World Development, 39(7), 1090-1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.006
  10. Brown J.R., Fazzari S.M., Petersen B.C. (2009) Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x
  11. Capron L., Hulland J. (1999) Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224299906300203.
  12. Cassiman B., Colombo M.G., Garrone P., Veugelers R. (2005) The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness. Research Policy, 34(2), 195-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.002
  13. Chakrabarti A., Hauschildt J. Suverkrup C. (1994) Does it pay to acquire technological firms? R&D Management, 24, 047-056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00846.x
  14. Chan L., Lakonishok J., Sougiannis T. (2001) The Stock Market Valuation of Research & Development Expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00411
  15. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  16. Cloodt M., Hagedoorn J., Kranenburg H.V. (2006) Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.007
  17. Cohen W., Levinthal D. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  18. DeYoung R., Evanoff D.D., Molyneux P. (2009) Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: A review of the post-2000 literature. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(2-3), 87-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-009-0066-7
  19. Desyllas P., Hughes A. (2008) Sourcing technological knowledge through corporate acquisition: Evidence from an international sample of high technology firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18(2), 157-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2007.12.003
  20. Duysters G., Hagedoorn J. (2001) Do Company Strategies and Stuctures Converge in Global Markets? Evidence from the Computer Industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 347-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490956
  21. Eisfeldt A.L., Papanikolaou D. (2014) The value and ownership of intangible capital. American Economic Review, 104 (5), 189-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.189
  22. Emrouznejad A., Yang G.L. (2018) A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008
  23. Griffith R., Harrison R., Van Reenen J. (2006) How Special Is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of U.S. R&D on U.K. Firms Spillovers as a Test of Technology Sourcing. American Economic Review, 96, 1859-1875.
  24. Griliches Z. (1958) Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations. Journal of Political Economy, 66 (5), 419-431. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826669.
  25. Griliches Z. (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
  26. Hagedoorn J. Duysters G. (2002) External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 167-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00287
  27. Hagedoorn J., Cloodt M. (2003) Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365-1379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3
  28. Haleblian J., Devers C.E., McNamara G., Carpenter M.A., Davison R.B. (2009) Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469-502. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206308330554.
  29. Hall B.H. (1996) The private and social returns to research and development (NBER Working Paper No. R2092), Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  30. Healy P.M., Palepu K.G., Ruback R.S. (1992) Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90002-F
  31. Hitt M., Hoskisson R., Ireland R., Harrison J. (1991) Effects of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256412
  32. Hitt M., Hoskisson R., Johnson R., Moesel D. (1996) The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1084-1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256993
  33. Holger E., Vitt J. (2000) The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behavior of Key Inventors. R&D Management, 30, 105-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00162
  34. Hung S.C., Lee Y., Lin B.W. (2006) R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.002
  35. Iwasa T., Odagiri H. (2004) Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: An empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US. Research Policy, 33(5): 807-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.002
  36. Jemison D., Haspeslagh P. (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal, New York: Free Press.
  37. Jovanovic B., Rousseau P.L. (2008) Mergers as reallocation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 765-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.4.765
  38. King D.R., Slotegraaf R.J., Kesner I. (2008) Performance implications of firm resource interactions in the acquisition of R&D-intensive firms. Organization Science, 19(2), 327-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0313
  39. Koellinger P. (2008) The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance - Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy, 37(8), 1317-1328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.024
  40. Kohers N., Kohers T. (2000) The value creation potential of high-tech mergers. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 40-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2359
  41. Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477. :5%3C461::AID-SMJ953%3E3.0.CO;2-L. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19
  42. Liu H., Chen T., Pai L. (2007) The Influence of Merger and Acquisition Activities on Corporate Performance in the Taiwanese Telecommunications Industry. The Service Industries Journal, 27(8), 1041-1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060701673729
  43. Lozano S., Villa G. (2010) DEA-based pre-merger planning tool. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(10), 1485-1497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.106
  44. Mansfield E. (1988) Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A Comparative Study. The American Economic Review, 78(2): 223-228. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818127.
  45. Ortega-Argiles R., Piva M., Potters L., Vivarelli M. (2010) Is corporate R&D investment in hightech sectors more effective? Contemporary Economic Policy, 28, 353-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2009.00186.x
  46. Peters R.H., Taylor L.A. (2017) Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2): 251-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.011
  47. Peyrache A. (2013) Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(2): 422-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.034
  48. Phillips G.M., Zhdanov A. (2013) R&D and the Incentives from Merger and Acquisition Activity. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(1): 34-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs109
  49. Phillips R.L., Ormsby R. (2016) Industry classification schemes: An analysis and review. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 21(1), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2015.1110229
  50. Prabhu J.C., Chandy R.K., Ellis M.E. (2005) The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 114-130. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.1.114.55514#
  51. Ranft A., Lord M. (2002) Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation. Organization Science, 13(4), 420-441. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3085975.
  52. Ranft A.L., Lord M.D. (2000) Acquiring new knowledge: The role of retaining human capital in acquisitions of high-tech firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2): 295-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00034-1
  53. Ravenscraft D., Scherer F. (1987) Life After Takeover. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2): 147-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098409
  54. Ravenscraft D., Scherer F.M. (1982) The lag structure of returns to research and development. Applied Economics, 14 (6), 603-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848200000036
  55. Sirmon D.G., Hitt M.A., Ireland R.D., Gilbert B.A. (2011) Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage: Breadth, Depth, and Life Cycle Effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390-1412. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206310385695.
  56. Stoneman P., Kwon M.J. (1996) Technology adoption and firm profitability. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 952-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235366
  57. Wagner M. (2011) To explore or to exploit? An empirical investigation of acquisitions by large incumbents. Research Policy, 40(9): 1217-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.006
  58. Wanke P., Maredza A., Gupta R. (2017) Merger and acquisitions in South African banking: A network DEA model. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 362-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.055
  59. Worthington A.C. (2001) Efficiency in pre?merger and post?merger non?bank financial institutions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22, 439-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1033
  60. Xie E., Reddy K.S., Liang J. (2017) Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».