Decomposition of Bark as a Part of Logging Slash after Clear-Cutting in Mixed Middle Boreal Forests
- Authors: Kapitsa E.A.1,2, Shorokhova E.V.1,2,3, Romashkin I.V.2, Galibina N.A.2, Nikerova K.M.2, Kazartsev I.A.1,2,4
-
Affiliations:
- Saint-Petersburg Forestry University
- Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
- All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection, Pushkin
- Issue: Vol 12, No 7 (2019)
- Pages: 760-768
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1995-4255/article/view/203768
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519070060
- ID: 203768
Cite item
Abstract
The contribution of bark, as a phytomass fraction, to nutrient cycling is studied insufficiently. This study followed six-year dynamics of physical and chemical characteristics of bark residues after clear cutting. The amount of bark present in logging slash was found to be 20.8 m3 ha–1, or one fifth of the volume of coarse woody debris, which varied from 105 to 127 m3 ha–1. The initial area-specific mass of bark was 0.601 g cm–2 for aspen, 0.346 g cm–2 for pine, 0.446 g cm–2 for birch, and 0.233 g cm–2 for spruce. The initial density of bark varied in the range of 0.51–0.71 g cm–3 for aspen, 0.56–0.80 g cm–3 for birch, 0.39–0.64 g cm–3 for pine, and 0.60–0.73 g cm–3 for spruce. The initial concentrations of nitrogen and carbon were 0.23–0.53% and 42–48%, respectively. The changes over time in specific mass, phloem percentage, and bark thickness depended on a particular tree species. The rate of mass loss was the maximal in spruce bark, whereas birch bark showed the maximal rate of phloem loss. The specific mass of bark decreased by 32–38%, the density by 10–17%, and the phloem percentage by 78–99% after six years since cutting. The concentrations of nitrogen and carbon in bark did not change during decomposition. Therefore, the bark layer on a soil surface partially compensates for the nitrogen losses caused by removal of logged wood.
About the authors
E. A. Kapitsa
Saint-Petersburg Forestry University; Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, 194021; Petrozavodsk, 185910
E. V. Shorokhova
Saint-Petersburg Forestry University; Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, 194021; Petrozavodsk, 185910; Helsinki, FI-00790
I. V. Romashkin
Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk, 185910
N. A. Galibina
Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk, 185910
K. M. Nikerova
Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk, 185910
I. A. Kazartsev
Saint-Petersburg Forestry University; Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences; All-Russia Institute of Plant Protection, Pushkin
Email: kapitsa@list.ru
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, 194021; Petrozavodsk, 185910; Saint Petersburg, 196608
Supplementary files
