Application of bispectral index and analgesia nociception index monitoring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The study provides a theoretical generalization and substantive solution to the scientific and practical problem of increasing the efficiency of anesthesia for surgical interventions, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, under individualized anesthetic support. This study also presents the peculiar courses of various anesthetic methods during the perioperative period in 120 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia types included total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Monitoring the bispectral index and analgesia and nociception index has been widely performed to assess the adequacy of various anesthetic options. These indices were also monitored to assess hemodynamic and autonomic regulation parameters in real time and to predict changes in these parameters intraoperatively. The results suggested the broad possibilities of monitoring, controlling, and minimizing the effect anesthesia on the cardiovascular system in conditions associated with a transient increase in the intra-abdominal pressure.

作者简介

A. Mashyn

«Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine»

Email: kobeliatsky@ukr.net
乌克兰, 49044, Dnipro

Yuriy Kobelyatskiy

«Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine»

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: kobeliatsky@ukr.net

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, State Institution “Dnepropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine”

乌克兰, 49044, Dnipro

参考

  1. Brown E, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal general anesthesia: theory and practice. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(5):1246–1258. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003668.
  2. Bajwa SJ, Kulshrestha A. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: General vs. Regional Anaesthesia. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(1):4–9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169952.
  3. Srivastava A, Niranjan A. Secrets of safe laparoscopic surgery: Anaesthetic and surgical considerations. J Minim Access Surg. 2010;6(4):91–94.
  4. Hori T, Oike F, Furuyama H, Machimoto T, Kadokawa Y, Hata T, et al. Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it rocket science? World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(47):10287–10303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287.
  5. Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Kltein AA, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):85–93. doi: 10.1111/anae.13316.
  6. Chumachenko ED. Analgesia Nociception Index: from Objective Evaluation of Nociception to Analgesia Improvement. Clinical Anesthesiology & Intensive Care. 2014;2(4):90–102.
  7. Le Guen M, Jeanne M, Sievert K, Al Moubarik M, Chazot T, Laloë PA, et al. The Analgesia Nociception Index: a pilot study to evaluation of a new pain parameter during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21(2):146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.01.001.
  8. Boselli E, Bouvet L, Bégou G, Torkmani S, Allaouchiche B. Prediction of haemodynamic reactivity during total intravenous anaesthesia for suspension laryngoscopy using Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI): a prospective observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(3):288–297.
  9. Jeanne M, Clement C, De Jonckheere J, Logier R, Tavernier B. Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. J Clin. Monit Comput. 2012;26(4):289–294. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9354-0.
  10. Peng K, Liu H-Y, Wu S-R, Liu H, Zhao-Cai Zhang Z-C, Fu-Hai Ji F-H. Does Propofol Anesthesia Lead to Less Postoperative Pain Compared With Inhalational Anesthesia? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2016;123(4):846–858. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001504.
  11. Prathep S, Mahattanaporn S, Wasinwong W. Target Controlled Infusion versus Sevoflurane/Desflurane Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison Postoperative Nausea/Vomiting and Extubation Time. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(12):1187–1192.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Comparison of the dynamics of mean values MAP (M, 95% CI) in the study groups

下载 (242KB)
3. Fig. 2. Comparison of the dynamics of the average BIS indicators (M, 95% CI) in the study groups

下载 (219KB)
4. Fig. 3. Comparison of the dynamics of average ANI indicators (M, 95% CI) in the study groups

下载 (272KB)
5. Fig. 4. Comparison of the mean values of time characteristics (Me (25–75%)) in the study groups

下载 (151KB)

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2020


 


##common.cookie##