Markers of Aging in Cells of Patients with Cockayne Syndrome. General and Individual Differences
- Authors: Slizhov P.A.1,2, Dolinina T.I.2,3, Pleskach N.M.2, Vasilishina A.A.2, Zherebtsov S.V.2, Bulatnikova M.A.4, Mikhelson V.M.2, Spivak I.M.2,5,3
-
Affiliations:
- Herzen State Pedagogical University
- Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
- Pokrovsky Stem Cell Bank
- St. Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 12, No 4 (2018)
- Pages: 296-306
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1990-519X/article/view/212708
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X18040090
- ID: 212708
Cite item
Abstract
Cockayne syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disease described in the 1930s by E.A. Cockayne. Patients suffer from cachectic dwarfism (when the weight is lowered compared to the norm even more than growth), photosensitivity, deafness, and various visual impairments (optic atrophy, cataracts, degeneration of the corneal epithelium, retinal injuries). The average life expectancy of patients with Cockayne syndrome is 12 years. In the cells of patients, the process of nucleotide excision repair (NER), its branch coupled with transcription (transcription coupled repair: TCR) (TC-NER), is disrupted. When studying the panel of aging markers (SA-β-gal, γ-H2AX, 53BP1, HP1-γ, SIRT1, SIRT6, 3meH3K9, 3meH3K27), as well as structural damage to nuclear lamina and telomere shortening, it was shown that the cells of patients with Cockayne syndrome have pronounced signs of accelerated aging in all studied markers. This allows us to consider Cockayne syndrome to be a true progeria and use cell lines obtained from patients as model objects for studying the processes of aging and testing geroprotectors.
Keywords
About the authors
P. A. Slizhov
Herzen State Pedagogical University; Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 191186; St. Petersburg, 194064
T. I. Dolinina
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064; St. Petersburg, 195251
N. M. Pleskach
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064
A. A. Vasilishina
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064
S. V. Zherebtsov
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064
M. A. Bulatnikova
Pokrovsky Stem Cell Bank
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199106
V. M. Mikhelson
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064
I. M. Spivak
Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; St. Petersburg State University; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Email: maidel@bk.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 194064; St. Petersburg, 199034; St. Petersburg, 195251
Supplementary files
