Attitudes toward social interaction with masculine and feminine types: An empirical study

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Introduction. Significant changes are taking place in the system of gender relations in modern conditions, but the processes of interaction in it remain poorly understood. Purpose: to identify differences in attitudes towards social interaction with people of masculine and feminine types. Theoretical analysis. The analysis showed that interaction in the space of gender relations is studied through the prism of gender norms and stereotypes, as well as by the method of comparative analysis of the psychological characteristics of communication, considering the gender factor. Empirical analysis. Methods: author’s questionnaire of social interaction (N = 388 people); stepwise discriminant and correlation analysis for paired samples (SPSS 27.0). Most of all, the attitude to interaction with people of the masculine and feminine types differs in the following parameters: considering the experience of relationships and partnership nature in interaction with feminine people; friendly support, mutual assistance in interaction with masculine people. Pairwise comparison of each respondent’s assessments of interaction with masculine/feminine type people showed differences in only 4 parameters: perception of rivalry between one’s own and partner, differences in values, use of intangible resources. Conclusion. For the first time, it was established what parameters differ in the attitude towards interaction with people of different gender types.

Sobre autores

Olga Titova

Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

20 Rokossovsky St., Krasnoyarsk 660131, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Клецина И. С., Иоффе Е. В. Гендерные нормы как социально-психологический феномен. М. : Проспект, 2017. 143 с.
  2. Ломако О. М. Генеалогия гендера: социальнофилософские аспекты // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2020. Т. 20, вып. 2. С. 134–137. https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-2-134-137
  3. Lee M., Kray L. J. A gender gap in managerial span of control: Implications for the gender pay gap // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2021. №167. С. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.06.001
  4. Atwood S., Axt J. R. Assessing implicit attitudes about androgyny // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2021. № 96. Р. 104162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104162
  5. Wittlin N. M., Dovidio J. F., LaFrance M., Burke S. E. About face: Memory for transgender versus cisgender targets’ facial appearance // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018. №78. Р. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.009
  6. Ma D. S., Correll J., Wittenbrink B. The effects of category and physical features on stereotyping and evaluation // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018. №79. Р. 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.008
  7. Lamer S. A., Weisbuch M. Men over women: The social transmission of gender stereotypes through spatial elevation // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2019. № 84. Р. 103828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103828
  8. Позняков В. П. Психологические отношения индивидуальных и групповых субъектов совместной экономической деятельности. М. : Издательство «Институт психологии РАН», 2018. 530 с.
  9. Балева М. В. Другой, похожий на меня: особенности внутригрупповой перцепции юношей и девушек с разной выраженностью негативных черт личности // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2019. № 74. С. 64–87. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/74/4
  10. Лопухова О. Г. Опросник «Маскулинность, феминность и гендерный тип личности» (российский аналог «Bem sex role inventory») // Вопросы психологии. 2013. № 1. С. 1–8.

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies