Features of modern approaches to the concept of “civilizational identity”: Russian and foreign research
- 作者: Shcherbakov I.M.1
-
隶属关系:
- Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова
- 期: 卷 25, 编号 2 (2025)
- 页面: 220-225
- 栏目: New Voices: Young Political Scientists’ Research
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1818-9601/article/view/354140
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2025-25-2-220-225
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XLWTHT
- ID: 354140
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
In this article, the author examines the variety of theoretical approaches to the concept of “civilizational identity” in Russian and foreign studies. Special attention is paid to the interpretation of the concept of “civilizational identity” by researchers from the countries of the Asia-Pacifi c region and the Middle East. This is important in the context of the deterioration of relations between Russia and Western countries and, as a result, the implementation of the “turn of Russia to the East” in the academic humanitarian environment, where one of the key places is occupied by the search for new grounds for analyzing the concept of “civilizational identity” based on cultural traditions and customs in the likeness of researchers ethnically representing the countries of the Global South. The result of this study is to develop, on the basis of the considered approaches, a generalized modern defi nition of the concept of “civilizational identity”, which is based on a set of principles and guidelines used by civilization to preserve its socio-cultural and political identity in world history. In addition, the author argues that within the current political conditions, this defi nition is fi xed in certain aspects in the documents of strategic planning of foreign policy of individual countries (Russia, Turkey). Such documents should include the Concept of Russia’s Foreign Policy adopted in 2023, the Concept of Russia’s Humanitarian Policy Abroad in 2022, as well as a Brief overview of the foreign policy of the Republic of Turkey and the political program of the Justice and Development Party, i.e. one of the leading political forces in Turkish politics.
作者简介
Ilya Shcherbakov
Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: scherbakovim@my.msu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9827-8603
ГСП-1, г. Москва, Ленинские горы, д.1, стр. 13 блок B, МГУ, 4-й учебный корпус, 5 этаж
参考
- Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций. М. : АСТ, 2003. 603 с.
- Братерский А. Россия и НАТО: как удержаться от войны // Газета.ру, 22.06.2019. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2019/06/22_a_12434671.shtml (дата обращения: 22.06.2024).
- Аватков В. А. Неоосманизм. Базовая идеологема и геостратегия Турции // Свободная мысль. 2014. № 3. С. 71–78. EDN: TNENSR
- Кондаков И. В. Цивилизационная идентичность России: сущность, структура и механизмы // Вопросы социальной теории. 2010. Т. 4. С. 282–304. EDN: NQXEOJ
- Мишучков А. А. Цивилизационная идентичность в системе общественной безопасности России // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2014. № 11 (172). С. 244–250. EDN: TNZGND
- Новая философская энциклопедия : в 4 т. / под ред. В. С. Степина. Т. 2. Е–М. М. : Мысль, 2001. 636 с.
- O’Hagan J. Discourses of Civilizational Identity // Civilizational identity: The production and reproduction of "civilizations" in international relations / ed. by M. Hall, P. T. Jackson. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230608924_2
- Mozaffari M. Globalization and Civilizations. 1st ed. London : Routledge. 288 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203217979
- Гринин Л. Е. Формации и цивилизации // Философия и общество. 2000, № 4 (21). С. 5–47. EDN: WCMTJP
- Melleuish G. The Clash of Civilization: A Model of Historical Development? // Thesis Eleven. 2000. Vol. 62, iss. 1. P. 109–120. http://doi.org/10.1177/0725513600062000007
补充文件


