Earthquake resistance analysis of structural systems of multi-storey civil buildings
- Autores: Abaev Z.K.1, Kodzaev M.Y.1, Bigulaev A.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Edição: Volume 16, Nº 1 (2020)
- Páginas: 76-82
- Seção: Seismic resistence
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1815-5235/article/view/325601
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2020-16-1-76-82
- ID: 325601
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
Relevance. Increasing the density of urban population requires the use of optimal structural systems of multi-storey civil buildings, however, despite a large number of studies on the rationality of their application, the question of choosing an assessment of seismic resistance of structural systems of multi-storey civil buildings is still open. The aim of the study. This study aims to determine advantages and disadvantages of structural systems of multi-storey buildings in seismic areas. Methods. The results of comparison analysis of five structural systems (columns grid - 6×6 m, storey height - 3 m, number of storeys - 20) are presented in this article. The structural systems are: frame & tube, frame & core, core & walls, framed core & walls, framed core & tube. The calculation were done according to Building Code 14.13330.2018 for an earthquake of 8 points intensity of MSK-64 intensity scale. The SCAD Office software package was used for modeling and analyzing. The sum of the effective modal masses taken in the calculation was at least 90% of the total mass of the system excited in the direction of the seismic action for horizontal impacts and at least 75% - for vertical impacts. Results. The comparison was carried out according to the following criteria: maximum displacements, maximum compressive and tensile stresses, maximum periods of natural oscillations, maximum accelerations.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Zaurbek Abaev
North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: abaich@yandex.ru
Código SPIN: 2843-1586
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Civil Engineering Department
44 Nikolaeva St., Vladikavkaz, 362021, Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, Russian FederationMarat Kodzaev
North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Email: abaich@yandex.ru
Código SPIN: 7389-8508
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
44 Nikolaeva St., Vladikavkaz, 362021, Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, Russian FederationAleksandr Bigulaev
North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Email: abaich@yandex.ru
Código SPIN: 8764-6513
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
44 Nikolaeva St., Vladikavkaz, 362021, Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Senin N.I. Ratsional'noe primenenie konstruktivnykh sistem mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy [Rational Usage of Structural Systems of Multi-Storey Buildings]. Vestnik MGSU. 2013;(11):76–83.
- Dzhinchvelashvili G.A., Bulushev, S.V. Feasibility evaluation for a predefined seismic resistance of structures. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2018;14(1):70–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/ 1815-5235-2018-14-1-70-79. (In Russ.)
- Aly A.M., Abburu S. On the Design of High-Rise Buildings for Multihazard: Fundamental Differences between Wind and Earthquake Demand. Shock and Vibration. 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/148681.
- Liang S., Zou L., Wang D., Huang G. Analysis of three-dimensional equivalent static wind loads of symmetric high-rise buildings based on wind tunnel tests. Wind and Structures. 2014;19(5):565–583. doi: 10.12989/was. 2014.19.5.565.
- Iacovino C., Ditommaso R., Ponzo F., Limongelli M. The Interpolation Evolution Method for damage localization in structures under seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2018;47(10):2117–2136. doi: 10.1002/eqe.3062.
- Laghi V., Palermo M., Trombetti T., Schildkamp M. Seismic-Proof Buildings in Developing Countries. Front. Built Environ. 2017;(3). doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00049.
- Bai Y., Shi Y., Deng K. Collapse analysis of highrise steel moment frames incorporating deterioration effects of column axial force – bending moment interaction. Engineering Structures. 2016;(127):402–415. doi: 10.1016/ j.engstruct.2016.09.005.
- Lu X., Wang D., Wang S. Investigation of the seismic response of high-rise buildings supported on tensionresistant elastomeric isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2016;45(13):2207–2228. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2755.
- Chapain S., Aly A.M. Vibration attenuation in high-rise buildings to achieve system-level performance under multiple hazards. Engineering Structures. 2019;(197):1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109352.
- Mohaiminul H., Sourav R., Amit Ch., Elias Md., Iftekharul A. Seismic performance analysis of RCC with plan multistoried buildings irregularity. American Journal of Civil Engineering. 2016;4(3):68–73. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20160403.11.
- Moon K. Optimal structural configurations for tall buildings. Proceedings of the 13th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, EASEC. 2013:354–355.
- Aydinoǧlu M.N. Challenges and Problems in Performance-Based Design of Tall Buildings. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. 2014;(32):279–300.
- Jiang H.J., Lu X.L., Liu X.J., He L.S. PerformanceBased Seismic Design Principles and Structural Analysis of Shanghai Tower. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2014;17(4):513–527. doi: 10.1260/1369-4332.17.4.513.
- Schueller W. High-Rise Building Structures. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Willey & Sons, Inc; 1977.
- Willford M., Whittaker A., Klemencic R. Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings. Council for Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. 2008:1–28. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2798.8085.
Arquivos suplementares
